Kimme-Smith C, Gomes A S, Cochran S T, Barbaric Z L, Lois J F
Med Phys. 1986 Nov-Dec;13(6):850-6. doi: 10.1118/1.595809.
The improved appearance of digital radiographs filtered to improve local contrast and sharpen edges has not increased acceptance of these images by radiologists. Furthermore, many radiologists assert that correct diagnosis is not improved with these filtered images. This study was designed to test this assertion for digital subtraction angiograms (DSA) of renal images. Four experiments are described. First, phantom studies identified filters and their parameters thought likely to be acceptable and useful in diagnosing renal images formed by DSA. Second, these filters and parameters were then tested on medical images to assess their acceptance by radiologists. Third, display modes of windowing, positive/negative presentation, and magnification were varied for filtered and unfiltered images to assess preferences of radiologists. Fourth, filtered and unfiltered magnified images were used to test improved diagnosis. In the final experiment, 148 images from 33 renal studies (15 normal, 18 abnormal) were magnified, gray level windowed, and filtered. Diagnosis was not improved by the two edge sharpening filters tested.
