Department of Radiotherapy, Fudan University Huadong Hospital.
Global Applied Science Laboratory, GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2022;46(4):545-550. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001314. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
The aims of the study were to explore the feasibility of generating a monoexponential model (MEM), stretched-exponential model (SEM) based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) by applying the same set of reduced b values and to compare their effectiveness in distinguishing prostate cancer from stromal hyperplasia (SH) in the transition zone (TZ) area.
An analysis of 75 patients who underwent preoperative DWI ( b values of 0, 700, 1400, 2000 s/mm 2 ) was performed. All lesions were localized on magnetic resonance images according to whole-mount histopathological correlations. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (α), distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC), mean diffusivity (MD), and mean kurtosis (MK) values were calculated and compared between the TZ cancer and SH groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were carried out for all parameters.
Compared with the SH group, the ADC, DDC, α, and MD values of the TZ cancer group were significantly reduced, while the MK value was significantly increased (all P < 0.05). The AUCs of the ADC, DDC, α, MD, and MK were 0.828, 0.801, 0.813, 0.822, and 0.882, respectively. The AUC of MK was significantly higher than that of the other parameters (all P < 0.05).
When using the reduced b -value set, all parameters from MEM, SEM, based DWI, and DKI can effectively distinguish TZ cancer from SH. Among them, DKI demonstrated potential clinical superiority over the others in TZ cancer diagnosis.
本研究旨在探索应用相同的低 b 值数据集生成单指数模型(MEM)、拉伸指数模型(SEM)基础的扩散加权成像(DWI)和扩散峰度成像(DKI)的可行性,并比较它们在区分前列腺过渡区(TZ)癌与基质增生(SH)中的效能。
对 75 例接受术前 DWI(b 值为 0、700、1400、2000 s/mm2)检查的患者进行分析。根据全器官组织病理学相关性,在磁共振图像上对所有病灶进行定位。计算并比较 TZ 癌组与 SH 组之间的表观扩散系数(ADC)、水分子扩散异质性指数(α)、分布扩散系数(DDC)、平均扩散系数(MD)和平均峰度(MK)值。对所有参数进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)计算。
与 SH 组相比,TZ 癌组的 ADC、DDC、α和 MD 值显著降低,MK 值显著升高(均 P<0.05)。ADC、DDC、α、MD 和 MK 的 AUC 分别为 0.828、0.801、0.813、0.822 和 0.882。MK 的 AUC 明显高于其他参数(均 P<0.05)。
应用低 b 值数据集时,MEM、SEM 基础 DWI 和 DKI 的所有参数均能有效区分 TZ 癌与 SH。其中,DKI 在 TZ 癌诊断中具有潜在的临床优势。