Alongi Pierpaolo, Laudicella Riccardo, Lanzafame Helena, Farolfi Andrea, Mapelli Paola, Picchio Maria, Burger Irene A, Iagaru Andrei, Minutoli Fabio, Evangelista Laura
Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Istituto G.Giglio, 90015 Cefalù, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;14(7):1770. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071770.
The aims of this systematic review were to (1) assess the utility of PSMA-PET and choline-PET in the assessment of response to systemic and local therapy, and to (2) determine the value of both tracers for the prediction of response to therapy and survival outcomes in prostate cancer. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed/Scopus/Google Scholar/Cochrane/EMBASE databases (between January 2010 and October 2021) accordingly. The quality of the included studies was evaluated following the "Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies" tool (QUAPAS-2). We selected 40 articles: 23 articles discussed the use of PET imaging with [Ga]PSMA-11 (16 articles/1123 patients) or [C]/[F]Choline (7 articles/356 patients) for the prediction of response to radiotherapy (RT) and survival outcomes. Seven articles (three with [Ga]PSMA-11, three with [C]Choline, one with [F]Choline) assessed the role of PET imaging in the evaluation of response to docetaxel (as neoadjuvant therapy in one study, as first-line therapy in five studies, and as a palliative regimen in one study). Seven papers with radiolabeled [F]Choline PET/CT ( = 121 patients) and three with [Ga]PSMA-11 PET ( = 87 patients) were selected before and after enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate. Finally, [F]Choline and [Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT as gatekeepers for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with Radium-223 were assessed in three papers. In conclusion, in patients undergoing RT, radiolabeled choline and [Ga]PSMA-11 have an important prognostic role. In the case of systemic therapies, the role of such new-generation imaging techniques is still controversial without sufficient data, thus requiring additional in this scenario.
(1)评估PSMA-PET和胆碱-PET在评估全身和局部治疗反应中的效用,以及(2)确定这两种示踪剂对预测前列腺癌治疗反应和生存结果的价值。我们相应地在PubMed/Scopus/Google Scholar/Cochrane/EMBASE数据库中进行了系统的文献检索(2010年1月至2021年10月)。按照“预后准确性研究质量评估”工具(QUAPAS-2)对纳入研究的质量进行评估。我们选择了40篇文章:23篇文章讨论了使用[Ga]PSMA-11(16篇文章/1123例患者)或[C]/[F]胆碱(7篇文章/356例患者)进行PET成像以预测放疗(RT)反应和生存结果。7篇文章(3篇使用[Ga]PSMA-11,3篇使用[C]胆碱,1篇使用[F]胆碱)评估了PET成像在评估多西他赛反应中的作用(在一项研究中作为新辅助治疗,在五项研究中作为一线治疗,在一项研究中作为姑息治疗方案)。选择了7篇关于放射性标记[F]胆碱PET/CT(n = 121例患者)和3篇关于[Ga]PSMA-11 PET(n = 87例患者)在恩杂鲁胺/醋酸阿比特龙治疗前后的文章。最后,3篇文章评估了[F]胆碱和[Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT作为镭-223治疗转移性前列腺癌的守门人的作用。总之,在接受放疗的患者中,放射性标记的胆碱和[Ga]PSMA-11具有重要的预后作用。在全身治疗的情况下,这种新一代成像技术的作用在没有足够数据的情况下仍存在争议,因此在这种情况下需要更多研究。