Effects of the antimutagen cinnamaldehyde on reversion and survival of selected Salmonella tester strains.

The antimutagenic activity of trans-cinnamaldehyde (C6H5CH = CHCHO) on chemically induced mutagenesis has been shown in E. coli. Using the Ames Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA1535 (hisG46 uvrB rfa) and TA100 (TA1535/pKM101), the effects of cinnamaldehyde on spontaneous reversions and reversions induced by 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide(4NQO) and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) have been examined. To observe the effect of cinnamaldehyde in the absence of functional muc genes, a third strain, TA1535/pGW201 (pKM101 muc140: :Tn5) was included in the testing. Modifications of the standard Ames test procedures and direct-plating techniques were employed to study the "antimutagenic" response exerted by cinnamaldehyde. In all strains tested, concentrations of cinnamaldehyde up to 25 micrograms/ml slightly decreased the number of spontaneous reversions and induced reversions were more markedly reduced. The decreases in the numbers of 4NQO-induced revertants were greater than those decreases which occurred for EMS-induced reversions. There was no effect on viability in 1% (v/v) nutrient broth supplemented minimal medium containing 5-25 micrograms/ml of cinnamaldehyde. Cinnamaldehyde did not display any mucAB dependent or independent specificity against the mutagens used. On minimal medium supplemented with histidine and biotin, concentrations of cinnamaldehyde above 10 micrograms/ml were lethal for the strains tested. When the test medium was supplemented with 1-5% (v/v) liquid nutrient broth, viability was not affected at concentrations up to 25 micrograms/ml. For both TA100 and TA1535 the presence of 20 micrograms/ml of cinnamaldehyde in 1% (v/v) liquid nutrient broth-supplemented minimal glucose broth extended the lag phase for 2-4 h with no effect on survival. Depending on the test procedure employed, decreases in numbers of revertants may reflect lethality rather than antimutagenesis. When used to test for antimutagenesis rather than mutagenesis, modifications of the standard Ames test procedure may mimic an antimutagenic response due to a decrease in the total number of revertants seen even though enough cells survive to produce a background lawn.