• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型纹理特征描述子的空间分布分析用于精确的乳腺密度分类。

Spatial Distribution Analysis of Novel Texture Feature Descriptors for Accurate Breast Density Classification.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.

Canterbury Breastcare, St. George's Medical Centre, Christchurch 8014, New Zealand.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;22(7):2672. doi: 10.3390/s22072672.

DOI:10.3390/s22072672
PMID:35408286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9002800/
Abstract

Breast density has been recognised as an important biomarker that indicates the risk of developing breast cancer. Accurate classification of breast density plays a crucial role in developing a computer-aided detection (CADe) system for mammogram interpretation. This paper proposes a novel texture descriptor, namely, rotation invariant uniform local quinary patterns (RIU4-LQP), to describe texture patterns in mammograms and to improve the robustness of image features. In conventional processing schemes, image features are obtained by computing histograms from texture patterns. However, such processes ignore very important spatial information related to the texture features. This study designs a new feature vector, namely, K-spectrum, by using Baddeley's K-inhom function to characterise the spatial distribution information of feature point sets. Texture features extracted by RIU4-LQP and K-spectrum are utilised to classify mammograms into BI-RADS density categories. Three feature selection methods are employed to optimise the feature set. In our experiment, two mammogram datasets, INbreast and MIAS, are used to test the proposed methods, and comparative analyses and statistical tests between different schemes are conducted. Experimental results show that our proposed method outperforms other approaches described in the literature, with the best classification accuracy of 92.76% (INbreast) and 86.96% (MIAS).

摘要

乳腺密度被认为是一个重要的生物标志物,可提示乳腺癌的发病风险。准确的乳腺密度分类在开发用于 mammogram 解读的计算机辅助检测(CADe)系统中起着至关重要的作用。本文提出了一种新的纹理描述符,即旋转不变均匀五元模式(RIU4-LQP),用于描述 mammogram 中的纹理模式,并提高图像特征的稳健性。在传统的处理方案中,通过从纹理模式计算直方图来获得图像特征。然而,这样的过程忽略了与纹理特征相关的非常重要的空间信息。本研究通过使用 Baddeley 的 K-非均匀函数来描述特征点集的空间分布信息,设计了一种新的特征向量,即 K-谱。通过 RIU4-LQP 和 K-谱提取的纹理特征用于将 mammogram 分类为 BI-RADS 密度类别。采用三种特征选择方法来优化特征集。在我们的实验中,使用了两个 mammogram 数据集,INbreast 和 MIAS,来测试所提出的方法,并对不同方案之间的对比分析和统计测试进行了比较。实验结果表明,与文献中描述的其他方法相比,我们提出的方法具有更好的性能,在 INbreast 数据集上的分类准确率达到了 92.76%,在 MIAS 数据集上的分类准确率达到了 86.96%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/9940b405c44e/sensors-22-02672-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/5f6328ff32a0/sensors-22-02672-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/afd45d2c83a5/sensors-22-02672-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/815a74467901/sensors-22-02672-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/c263133a7765/sensors-22-02672-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/32d91282e89f/sensors-22-02672-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/e85e261e6066/sensors-22-02672-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/e3465b4f20e0/sensors-22-02672-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/ddab14d0b597/sensors-22-02672-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/35320f19f121/sensors-22-02672-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/b32d76dc0992/sensors-22-02672-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/a52e66d7fc32/sensors-22-02672-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/02ef8bd4ba90/sensors-22-02672-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/aa62fdd71c36/sensors-22-02672-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/64ccab3e8b66/sensors-22-02672-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/2338a68f6962/sensors-22-02672-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/77b9caca623a/sensors-22-02672-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/9940b405c44e/sensors-22-02672-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/5f6328ff32a0/sensors-22-02672-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/afd45d2c83a5/sensors-22-02672-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/815a74467901/sensors-22-02672-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/c263133a7765/sensors-22-02672-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/32d91282e89f/sensors-22-02672-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/e85e261e6066/sensors-22-02672-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/e3465b4f20e0/sensors-22-02672-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/ddab14d0b597/sensors-22-02672-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/35320f19f121/sensors-22-02672-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/b32d76dc0992/sensors-22-02672-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/a52e66d7fc32/sensors-22-02672-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/02ef8bd4ba90/sensors-22-02672-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/aa62fdd71c36/sensors-22-02672-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/64ccab3e8b66/sensors-22-02672-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/2338a68f6962/sensors-22-02672-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/77b9caca623a/sensors-22-02672-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe00/9002800/9940b405c44e/sensors-22-02672-g017.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatial Distribution Analysis of Novel Texture Feature Descriptors for Accurate Breast Density Classification.新型纹理特征描述子的空间分布分析用于精确的乳腺密度分类。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;22(7):2672. doi: 10.3390/s22072672.
2
Novel Texture Feature Descriptors Based on Multi-Fractal Analysis and LBP for Classifying Breast Density in Mammograms.基于多重分形分析和局部二值模式的新型纹理特征描述符用于乳腺钼靶片中乳腺密度的分类
J Imaging. 2021 Oct 6;7(10):205. doi: 10.3390/jimaging7100205.
3
Breast density classification in mammograms: An investigation of encoding techniques in binary-based local patterns.乳腺钼靶片中的乳腺密度分类:基于二进制局部模式的编码技术研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jul;122:103842. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103842. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
A New Computer-Aided Diagnosis System with Modified Genetic Feature Selection for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Masses in Mammograms.一种基于改进遗传特征选择的计算机辅助诊断系统,用于乳腺钼靶片中乳腺肿块的 BI-RADS 分类。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 May 11;2020:7695207. doi: 10.1155/2020/7695207. eCollection 2020.
5
Breast density classification to reduce false positives in CADe systems.乳腺密度分类可减少 CADe 系统中的假阳性。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014 Feb;113(2):569-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
6
Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.数字乳腺摄影中的实质纹理分析:用于乳腺癌风险评估的全自动流程
Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):4149-60. doi: 10.1118/1.4921996.
7
Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.乳腺X线密度和结构特征在乳腺X线筛查中可单独或共同影响乳腺癌风险评估:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16:414. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2450-7.
8
Multiresolution local binary pattern texture analysis combined with variable selection for application to false-positive reduction in computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.多分辨率局部二值模式纹理分析与变量选择相结合,应用于降低乳腺 X 线摄影计算机辅助检测中乳腺肿块的假阳性率。
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 7;57(21):7029-52. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7029. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
9
Breast density characterization using texton distributions.使用纹理分布进行乳腺密度特征分析。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:5004-7. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091240.
10
Experimental investigation on breast tissue classification based on statistical feature extraction of mammograms.基于乳房X光照片统计特征提取的乳腺组织分类实验研究
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007 Jan;31(1):46-8. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2006.09.015. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Study on Local Binary Patterns for Mammographic Density and Risk Scoring.乳腺密度和风险评分的局部二值模式比较研究
J Imaging. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):24. doi: 10.3390/jimaging5020024.
2
Breast density classification in mammograms: An investigation of encoding techniques in binary-based local patterns.乳腺钼靶片中的乳腺密度分类:基于二进制局部模式的编码技术研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jul;122:103842. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103842. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Multi-View Mammographic Density Classification by Dilated and Attention-Guided Residual Learning.
基于扩张和注意力引导残差学习的多视图乳腺密度分类。
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2021 May-Jun;18(3):1003-1013. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2020.2970713. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
4
Breast pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms using a modified holistically-nested edge detection network.基于改进的全嵌套边缘检测网络的乳腺钼靶图像中胸大肌分割
Med Image Anal. 2019 Oct;57:1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
5
Deep learning in mammography and breast histology, an overview and future trends.深度学习在乳腺 X 线摄影和乳腺组织学中的应用:概述与未来趋势。
Med Image Anal. 2018 Jul;47:45-67. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
6
Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.使用全卷积网络进行自动乳腺钼靶密度估计。
Med Phys. 2018 Mar;45(3):1178-1190. doi: 10.1002/mp.12763. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
Computer-aided assessment of breast density: comparison of supervised deep learning and feature-based statistical learning.计算机辅助乳腺密度评估:监督式深度学习与基于特征的统计学习方法的比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jan 9;63(2):025005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9f87.
8
A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories.一种用于对乳腺钼靶图像的乳房密度类别进行分类的深度学习方法。
Med Phys. 2018 Jan;45(1):314-321. doi: 10.1002/mp.12683. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.临床与自动乳腺密度测量的比较:对风险预测和补充筛查的意义。
Radiology. 2016 Jun;279(3):710-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151261. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
10
Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.乳腺钼靶片中乳房边界和胸肌分割的最新进展综述。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016 Jul;54(7):1003-24. doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1411-7. Epub 2015 Nov 6.