Baird W M, Turek M D, Minn F L, Brown R H
Pharmacotherapy. 1986 Sep-Oct;6(5):219-27. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1986.tb03480.x.
Eighty-eight patients with moderate or severe postoperative pain were entered into a double-blind, single-injection trial designed to assess the analgesic efficacy of intramuscular zomepirac 100 mg. Patients were randomly selected to receive zomepirac injection, meperidine 100 mg or meperidine 50 mg. By most criteria of analgesic efficacy, zomepirac was superior to meperidine 50 mg and as effective as meperidine 100 mg. In terms of peak analgesia (and of patients' global evaluations), both meperidine 100 mg and zomepirac were superior to meperidine 50 mg. Total analgesia provided by zomepirac was greater than that with meperidine 100 mg, which was greater than that with meperidine 50 mg. Significantly fewer patients needed remedication during the observation period, and mean time to remedication was significantly longer for the zomepirac group than for either meperidine group. No serious adverse effects were reported.
88例有中度或重度术后疼痛的患者进入一项双盲、单次注射试验,该试验旨在评估100毫克肌内注射氯胺酮的镇痛效果。患者被随机选择接受氯胺酮注射、100毫克哌替啶或50毫克哌替啶。根据大多数镇痛效果标准,氯胺酮优于50毫克哌替啶,且与100毫克哌替啶效果相同。在峰值镇痛(以及患者的总体评价)方面,100毫克哌替啶和氯胺酮均优于50毫克哌替啶。氯胺酮提供的总镇痛效果大于100毫克哌替啶,而100毫克哌替啶又大于50毫克哌替啶。在观察期内需要补救用药的患者明显较少,且氯胺酮组患者补救用药的平均时间比任一哌替啶组都明显更长。未报告严重不良反应。