School of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan RD, Shanghai 200240, China.
Institute of Cultural Innovation and Youth Development, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan RD, Shanghai 200240, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 25;19(7):3942. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073942.
International metropolises are key sites of outbreaks of COVID-19 cases. Global public evaluation of the pandemic in international cities is affected by many factors. This study examines how media exposure affects this evaluation and how media trust and media bias perception moderate the relationship between them. Based on an online survey of the evaluation of 13 international cities' pandemic performances by 1171 citizens from 11 countries, this study conducted a multi-level stepwise regression analysis and discovered that: (1) different forms of media affect global citizens' perceptions of international metropolis COVID-19 pandemic performance differently; and the role of traditional paper media, including newspapers and magazines, is of little significance in comparison to electronic media. (2) Among electronic media, TV and broadcasting have the greatest impact, followed by social media and the Internet. (3) Media trust and media bias perception affect people's evaluations of international urban pandemics, but our survey reveals that they only function with regard to social media.
国际大都市是 COVID-19 病例爆发的关键地点。国际城市对大流行的全球公众评价受到许多因素的影响。本研究探讨了媒体接触如何影响这种评价,以及媒体信任和媒体偏见感知如何调节它们之间的关系。基于对来自 11 个国家的 1171 名公民对 13 个国际城市大流行表现的评价的在线调查,本研究进行了多层次逐步回归分析,发现:(1)不同形式的媒体对全球公民对国际大都市 COVID-19 大流行表现的看法有不同的影响;与电子媒体相比,传统纸质媒体(包括报纸和杂志)的作用不大。(2)在电子媒体中,电视和广播的影响最大,其次是社交媒体和互联网。(3)媒体信任和媒体偏见感知影响人们对国际城市大流行的评价,但我们的调查显示,它们仅在社交媒体方面起作用。