• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据调整后的加那利群岛(西班牙)疾病分组分层情况的医疗保健支出变化。

Variability in Healthcare Expenditure According to the Stratification of Adjusted Morbidity Groups in the Canary Islands (Spain).

机构信息

Health Promotion Service, Directorate General for Public Health, Canary Islands Health Service, 35003 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Nursing and Healthcare Research Unit (Investén-isciii), Institute of Health Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;19(7):4219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074219.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19074219
PMID:35409900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8998451/
Abstract

Morbidity is the main item in the distribution of expenditure on healthcare services. The Adjusted Morbidity Group (AMG) measures comorbidity and complexity and classifies the patient into mutually exclusive clinical categories. The aim of this study is to analyse the variability of healthcare expenditure on users with similar scores classified by the AMG. Observational analytical and retrospective study. Population: 1,691,075 subjects, from Canary Islands (Spain), aged over 15 years with data from health cards, clinical history, Basic Minimum Specialised Healthcare Data Set, AMG, hospital agreements information system and Electronic Prescriptions. A descriptive, bivariant (ANOVA coefficient η) and multivariant analysis was conducted. There is a correlation between the costs and the weight of AMG (rho = 0.678) and the prescribed active ingredients (rho = 0.689), which is smaller with age and does not exist with the other variables. As for the influence of the AMG morbidity group on the total costs of the patient, the coefficient η (0.09) obtains a median effect in terms of the variability of expenditure, hence there is intra- and inter-group variability in the cost. In a first model created with all the variables and the cost, an explanatory power of 36.43% (R = 0.3643) was obtained; a second model that uses solely active ingredients, AMG weight, being female and a pensioner obtained an explanatory power of 36.4%. There is room for improvement in terms of predicting the expenditure.

摘要

发病率是医疗服务支出分布的主要项目。调整发病率群组(AMG)衡量共病和复杂性,并将患者分为互斥的临床类别。本研究的目的是分析按 AMG 分类的具有相似得分的患者的医疗支出的可变性。观察性分析和回顾性研究。人群:来自加那利群岛(西班牙)的 1,691,075 名年龄在 15 岁以上的患者,其数据来自健康卡、临床病史、基本专科医疗数据集、AMG、医院协议信息系统和电子处方。进行了描述性、双变量(ANOVA 系数 η)和多变量分析。AMG 的权重与费用之间存在相关性(rho = 0.678)和规定的活性成分之间的相关性(rho = 0.689),这种相关性随着年龄的增长而减小,与其他变量无关。至于 AMG 发病率组对患者总费用的影响,η 系数(0.09)表示支出变化的中位数效应,因此在成本方面存在组内和组间的变异性。在使用所有变量和成本创建的第一个模型中,获得了 36.43%的解释能力(R = 0.3643);第二个模型仅使用活性成分、AMG 权重、女性和养老金领取者,获得了 36.4%的解释能力。在预测支出方面还有改进的空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e43b/8998451/5ef6b3ba8a74/ijerph-19-04219-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e43b/8998451/5ef6b3ba8a74/ijerph-19-04219-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e43b/8998451/5ef6b3ba8a74/ijerph-19-04219-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Variability in Healthcare Expenditure According to the Stratification of Adjusted Morbidity Groups in the Canary Islands (Spain).根据调整后的加那利群岛(西班牙)疾病分组分层情况的医疗保健支出变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;19(7):4219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074219.
2
[Validity of predictive power of the Adjusted Morbidity Groups (AMG) with respect to others population stratification tools.].调整后发病组(AMG)相对于其他人群分层工具的预测能力的有效性。
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Jul 3;94:e202007079.
3
Comorbidities and use of health services in people with diabetes mellitus according to risk levels by adjusted morbidity groups.根据调整后的发病风险组,糖尿病患者的合并症及卫生服务利用情况。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01634-0.
4
[Comparison of predictive models for the selection of high-complexity patients].[用于选择高复杂性患者的预测模型比较]
Gac Sanit. 2019 Jan-Feb;33(1):60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
5
[Impact of Morbidity on Health Care Costs of a Department of Health through Clinical Risk Groups. Valencian Community, Spain].[通过临床风险组分析发病率对西班牙巴伦西亚自治区一个卫生部门医疗保健成本的影响]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2016 Jun 8;90:e1-e15.
6
Chronic diseases in the geriatric population: morbidity and use of primary care services according to risk level.老年人群中的慢性病:根据风险水平的发病率和初级保健服务的使用情况。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02217-7.
7
Variability in prescription drug expenditures explained by adjusted clinical groups (ACG) case-mix: a cross-sectional study of patient electronic records in primary care.调整临床分组(ACG)病例组合对处方药支出变异性的解释:一项针对基层医疗中患者电子病历的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 4;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-53.
8
Predicting healthcare expenditure by multimorbidity groups.预测多病种群组的医疗支出。
Health Policy. 2019 Apr;123(4):427-434. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
9
Does the pharmacy expenditure of patients always correspond with their morbidity burden? Exploring new approaches in the interpretation of pharmacy expenditure.患者的药房支出是否总是与其疾病负担相对应?探索药房支出解释的新方法。
BMC Public Health. 2010 May 11;10:244. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-244.
10
[Distribution of primary care expenditure according to sex and age group: a retrospective analysis].[按性别和年龄组划分的初级保健支出分布:一项回顾性分析]
Aten Primaria. 2012 Mar;44(3):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The nursing process and total health cost variability: an analysis using machine learning.护理过程与总体医疗成本变异性:一项使用机器学习的分析
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03304-5.
2
Differences in healthcare service utilization in patients with polypharmacy according to their risk level by adjusted morbidity groups: a population-based cross-sectional study.根据调整后的发病群体按风险水平划分的多重用药患者医疗服务利用差异:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Nov 28;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00665-7.
3
Care Needs of Highly Complex Chronic Patients in the Canary Islands: An Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of quantitative measures of multimorbidity: a population-based retrospective analysis.多病症定量指标的表现:基于人群的回顾性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 18;21(1):1881. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11922-2.
2
Tailoring integrated care services for high-risk patients with multiple chronic conditions: a risk stratification approach using cluster analysis.针对患有多种慢性病的高危患者定制综合护理服务:一种使用聚类分析的风险分层方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 27;20(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05668-7.
3
[Validity of predictive power of the Adjusted Morbidity Groups (AMG) with respect to others population stratification tools.].
加那利群岛高度复杂慢性病患者的护理需求:一项观察性研究。
Nurs Rep. 2022 Dec 20;13(1):1-16. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13010001.
调整后发病组(AMG)相对于其他人群分层工具的预测能力的有效性。
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Jul 3;94:e202007079.
4
What lies beneath: a retrospective, population-based cohort study investigating clinical and resource-use characteristics of institutionalized older people in Catalonia.表象之下:基于人群的回顾性队列研究,调查加泰罗尼亚机构化老年人的临床和资源使用特征。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 2;20(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01587-8.
5
[Chronic diseases in the paediatric population: Comorbidities and use of primary care services].[儿科人群中的慢性病:合并症与初级保健服务的利用]
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2020 Sep;93(3):183-193. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2019.12.019. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
6
Predicting the Cost of Health Care Services: A Comparison of Case-mix Systems and Comorbidity Indices That Use Administrative Data.预测医疗保健服务成本:使用行政数据的病例组合系统和共病指数的比较。
Med Care. 2020 Feb;58(2):114-119. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001247.
7
Predicting healthcare expenditure by multimorbidity groups.预测多病种群组的医疗支出。
Health Policy. 2019 Apr;123(4):427-434. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
8
[Clinical validation of 2 morbidity groups in the primary care setting].[基层医疗环境中两个发病群体的临床验证]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Feb;52(2):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.09.016. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Influence of demographic and clinical characteristics of elderly patients with a hip fracture on mortality: A retrospective, total cohort study in North-East Spain.老年髋部骨折患者的人口统计学和临床特征对死亡率的影响:西班牙东北部的一项回顾性、全队列研究。
Bone. 2018 Dec;117:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
[Validity of adjusted morbidity groups with respect to clinical risk groups in the field of primary care].[基层医疗领域中调整后的发病群组相对于临床风险群组的有效性]
Aten Primaria. 2019 Mar;51(3):153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.09.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.