Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4248. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074248.
Although marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) are involved in monitoring medication safety, it was unclear how they experience their role and current monitoring activities in pregnancy. Therefore, a qualitative study using online focus groups with MAHs and the Belgian umbrella organisation of MAHs was conducted in June-July 2021. In total, 38 representatives of nine organisations participated. Overall, participants reported multiple difficulties with data collection, including underreporting, collection of incomplete information, and loss to follow-up. The limited number of high-quality data collected, the unknown denominator and the lack of comparator data complicate MAHs' data processing activities, preventing them to timely provide evidence in the pregnancy label. Three 'conflicts' inherent to the specific position of MAHs were identified explaining the difficulties they experience, i.e., (1) mistrust from patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs); (2) MAHs' legal obligations and regulatory framework; (3) MAHs' position outside the healthcare context. To overcome these barriers, MAHs suggested that data registration should occur in close collaboration with patients and HCPs, organised within the healthcare context and performed by using a user-friendly system. In conclusion, the reported difficulties and underlying conflicts of MAHs highlight the need for more effective, collaborative data collection strategies to generate new evidence on this topic.
尽管上市许可持有人(MAH)参与监测药物安全性,但尚不清楚他们如何体验其在妊娠期间的角色和当前监测活动。因此,2021 年 6 月至 7 月采用 MAH 和比利时 MAH 伞式组织的在线焦点小组进行了一项定性研究。共有 9 个组织的 38 名代表参加了该研究。总体而言,参与者报告了数据收集方面的多项困难,包括漏报、信息收集不完整和随访丢失。收集到的高质量数据数量有限、未知分母以及缺乏对照数据,使 MAH 的数据处理活动变得复杂,使他们无法及时在妊娠标签中提供证据。确定了三个“固有”于 MAH 特定立场的“冲突”,解释了他们所经历的困难,即(1)患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的不信任;(2)MAH 的法律义务和监管框架;(3)MAH 处于医疗保健环境之外的立场。为了克服这些障碍,MAH 建议数据登记应与患者和 HCP 密切合作进行,在医疗保健环境中组织,并使用用户友好的系统进行。总之,报告的困难和 MAH 背后的冲突凸显了需要更有效的、协作的数据收集策略,以产生关于该主题的新证据。