College of Economics & Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 3;19(7):4294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074294.
The capability approach conceptualizes poverty as capability deprivation. Given that functionings and opportunities as key factors are diverse, the combination of a varied lack of functionings and opportunities will lead to different deprivation patterns. Therefore, we sought to investigate the association between the category of capacity deprivation and the subjective acquisition of rural households.
Data were collected from the micro survey of 892 households in six provinces. The overall sense of acquisition was measured by self-assessment of life satisfaction and the relative sense of gain was measured by self-assessment of social status and communication confidence. Capability deprivation was assessed through evaluation functionings and opportunities for a better life, such as education, social security, medical and health services, living conditions and spiritual and cultural activities. The factor mixture models were used to investigate the group categories of capability deprivation and ordered probit regression was used to estimate the associations between the categories of capability deprivation and sense of gain.
There were mild, moderate and severe differences among the deprivation items reflecting functionings and opportunities. In addition, capability deprivation was grouped into four classes: double deprivation of functionings and opportunities, severe deprivation of opportunities, functionings deprivation and non-poverty. There was a significant negative relationship between deprivation classes and the subjective sense of gain.
The deprivation from some social participation functions and services led to a reduced sense of acquisition. However, serious deprivations from educational opportunities and social participation opportunities were the main reason for the lower sense of gain. Eliminating the unequal educational opportunities and social participation opportunities for people is imperative to improving the subjective sense of gain.
能力方法将贫困概念化为能力剥夺。由于作为关键因素的功能和机会是多样化的,各种功能和机会的缺乏组合将导致不同的剥夺模式。因此,我们试图研究能力剥夺类别与农村家庭主观获得之间的关联。
数据来自六个省份 892 户的微观调查。总体获得感通过生活满意度自评来衡量,相对收益感通过社会地位和沟通信心自评来衡量。能力剥夺通过评估教育、社会保障、医疗和卫生服务、生活条件以及精神和文化活动等更好生活的功能和机会来评估。使用因子混合模型研究能力剥夺的分组类别,并使用有序概率回归估计能力剥夺类别与收益感之间的关联。
反映功能和机会的剥夺项目存在轻度、中度和重度差异。此外,能力剥夺分为四类:功能和机会的双重剥夺、机会严重剥夺、功能剥夺和非贫困。剥夺类别的下降与主观收益感之间存在显著的负相关关系。
一些社会参与功能和服务的剥夺导致获得感降低。然而,教育机会和社会参与机会的严重剥夺是收益感较低的主要原因。消除人们在教育机会和社会参与机会方面的不平等,对于提高主观收益感至关重要。