Lubke Gitta, Neale Michael
University of Notre Dame.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2008 Oct;43(4):592-620. doi: 10.1080/00273170802490673.
Factor mixture models (FMM's) are latent variable models with categorical and continuous latent variables which can be used as a model-based approach to clustering. A previous paper covered the results of a simulation study showing that in the absence of model violations, it is usually possible to choose the correct model when fitting a series of models with different numbers of classes and factors within class. The response format in the first study was limited to normally distributed outcomes. The current paper has two main goals, firstly, to replicate parts of the first study with 5-point Likert scale and binary outcomes, and secondly, to address the issue of testing class invariance of thresholds and loadings. Testing for class invariance of parameters is important in the context of measurement invariance and when using mixture models to approximate non-normal distributions. Results show that it is possible to discriminate between latent class models and factor models even if responses are categorical. Comparing models with and without class-specific parameters can lead to incorrectly accepting parameter invariance if the compared models differ substantially with respect to the number of estimated parameters. The simulation study is complemented with an illustration of a factor mixture analysis of ten binary depression items obtained from a female subsample of the Virginia Twin Registry.
因子混合模型(FMM)是具有分类和连续潜在变量的潜在变量模型,可作为基于模型的聚类方法。之前的一篇论文涵盖了一项模拟研究的结果,该研究表明,在不存在模型违背的情况下,在拟合一系列具有不同类别数量和类别内因子数量的模型时,通常能够选择正确的模型。第一项研究中的响应格式仅限于正态分布的结果。当前论文有两个主要目标,首先,用5点李克特量表和二元结果重复第一项研究的部分内容,其次,解决检验阈值和负荷的类别不变性问题。在测量不变性的背景下以及使用混合模型近似非正态分布时,检验参数的类别不变性很重要。结果表明,即使响应是分类的,也能够区分潜在类别模型和因子模型。如果所比较的模型在估计参数数量方面存在很大差异,那么比较具有和不具有类别特定参数的模型可能会导致错误地接受参数不变性。模拟研究辅以对从弗吉尼亚双胞胎登记处的女性子样本中获得的十个二元抑郁项目进行因子混合分析的示例。