Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
J Intern Med. 2022 Sep;292(3):501-511. doi: 10.1111/joim.13498. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Although epistaxis is one of the most common side effects of oral anticoagulation, it is unclear whether epistaxis rates vary between different oral anticoagulants (OAC).
To compare rates of clinically relevant epistaxis between OAC.
Epistaxis event rates were compared between new users of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin in a nationwide population-based cohort study over a 5-year study period, 2014-2019. Data was collected from the Icelandic Medicine Registry and the five major hospitals in Iceland. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to yield balanced baseline characteristics, and epistaxis rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression.
During the study period, 2098 patients received apixaban, 474 dabigatran, 3106 rivaroxaban, and 1403 warfarin. In total, 93 patients presented with clinically relevant epistaxis, including 11 (12%) major epistaxis events and one fatal epistaxis episode. Furthermore, seven patients (9%) with non-major epistaxis later presented with major bleeding during the follow-up period. Warfarin use was associated with higher rates of epistaxis compared to apixaban (2.2 events per 100-person years (events/100-py) vs. 0.6 events/100-py, hazard ratio [HR] 4.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08-8.59, p < 0.001), rivaroxaban (2.2 events/100-py vs. 1.0 events/100-py, HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-4.01, p = 0.005), and dabigatran (2.2 events/100-py vs. no events, HR n/a, p < 0.001).
Warfarin treatment was associated with higher rates of clinically relevant epistaxis compared to direct oral anticoagulants.
尽管鼻出血是口服抗凝药物最常见的副作用之一,但不同口服抗凝药物(OAC)之间的鼻出血发生率是否存在差异尚不清楚。
比较不同 OAC 之间的临床相关鼻出血发生率。
在一项为期 5 年的研究期间(2014-2019 年),在一项全国性基于人群的队列研究中,比较了新使用阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班和华法林的患者之间的鼻出血事件发生率。数据来自冰岛医药登记处和冰岛的五所主要医院。使用逆概率加权(IPW)使基线特征达到平衡,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存估计和 Cox 回归比较鼻出血发生率。
在研究期间,有 2098 例患者接受了阿哌沙班治疗,474 例患者接受了达比加群治疗,3106 例患者接受了利伐沙班治疗,1403 例患者接受了华法林治疗。共有 93 例患者出现了临床相关的鼻出血,包括 11 例(12%)大出血事件和 1 例致命的鼻出血发作。此外,7 例(9%)非大出血患者在随访期间出现了大出血。与阿哌沙班相比,华法林治疗与更高的鼻出血发生率相关(2.2 例/100 人年[事件/100-人年]与 0.6 例/100 人年,风险比[HR]为 4.22,95%置信区间[CI]为 2.08-8.59,p<0.001)、利伐沙班(2.2 例/100 人年与 1.0 例/100 人年,HR 为 2.26,95%CI 为 1.28-4.01,p=0.005)和达比加群(2.2 例/100 人年与无事件,HR 不适用,p<0.001)。
与直接口服抗凝剂相比,华法林治疗与更高的临床相关鼻出血发生率相关。