Suppr超能文献

[疑似做作性障碍:整形外科中自我造成的伤口的识别]

[Suspected factitious disorder: identifying self-inflicted wounds in plastic surgery].

作者信息

Steubing Yonca, Goertz Ole, Lehnhardt Marcus

机构信息

Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Abteilung für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie, Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum, Sarkomzentrum: Prof. Dr. Marcus Lehnhardt.

Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus Berlin, Klinik für Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Tumorchirurgie, Handchirurgie: Prof. Dr. Ole Goertz.

出版信息

Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2022 Apr;54(2):119-125. doi: 10.1055/a-1791-1408. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with factitious disorders artificially generate, aggravate or feign injuries or illnesses, which can result in severe physical impairment and misuse of the healthcare system. The symptomatology is characterized by a protracted course of disease with frequent changes of practitioners and multiple invasive procedures due to anomalous, mostly chronic findings. Elaborate clinical presentations, lack of knowledge of disease characteristics and the fast-paced everyday clinical practice can lead to maintaining the disease through non-recognition or mistreatment.

METHODS

Based on selective literature research and clinical case reports from a university clinic for plastic surgery, this article provides a review about common features of factitious disorders as well as treatment strategies.

RESULTS

If a factitious disorder is suspected, invasive treatments should be restricted and psychosomatic or psychiatric expertise obtained. Within an empathic physician-patient relation and with psychotherapeutic support, patients can be gradually introduced to the diagnosis and therapy options and treatment terminations could be avoided.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of indicators for factitious disorders, which may become evident in medical history, findings and illness-affirming behaviour, is key to identify affected patients and initiate appropriate treatment. For this purpose, factitious disorders should be included in differential diagnostic considerations even in primarily somatic medical specialties. Since the diagnosis is often based on evidence and complicated by withheld information or medical confidentiality, the establishment of a central reporting register could facilitate the diagnostic process and improve therapy in the future.

摘要

背景

做作性障碍患者人为制造、加重或伪装损伤或疾病,这可能导致严重的身体损害并滥用医疗保健系统。其症状表现为病程迁延,因异常(大多为慢性)检查结果而频繁更换医生并接受多次侵入性操作。复杂的临床表现、对疾病特征的不了解以及日常快节奏的临床实践,可能导致因未识别或误治而使疾病持续存在。

方法

基于一所大学整形外科诊所的选择性文献研究和临床病例报告,本文对做作性障碍的常见特征及治疗策略进行综述。

结果

如果怀疑存在做作性障碍,应限制侵入性治疗,并寻求身心医学或精神科专业意见。在建立共情的医患关系并给予心理治疗支持的情况下,可以逐步让患者了解诊断和治疗选择,避免治疗中断。

结论

了解做作性障碍的指标(可能在病史、检查结果和确认疾病行为中显现)是识别受影响患者并启动适当治疗的关键。为此,即使在主要的躯体医学专科中,做作性障碍也应纳入鉴别诊断的考虑范围。由于诊断通常基于证据,且因信息隐瞒或医疗保密而变得复杂,建立中央报告登记册可能有助于诊断过程,并在未来改善治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验