• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牵引法与传统内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃上皮性肿瘤的随机对照研究。

Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

Clinical Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Apr 1;101(13):e29172. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029172.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000029172
PMID:35421071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9276441/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for dissection. The traction-assisted approach overcomes some of the difficulties of gastric ESD, but its ability to reduce the procedure time remains unclear. The traction-assisted approach using dental floss and a clip did not reduce procedure time in the total population, but it reduced procedure time for lesions limited to the greater curvature of the upper or middle of the stomach. Although the traction direction of the clip-with-line method may be limited to the oral side via the cardia, EndoTrac ESD may provide flexible traction at any time during the procedure. This prospective randomized control study has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of EndoTrac and conventional gastric ESD.

METHODS/DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 150 patients at 2 hospitals in Japan undergoing EndoTrac or conventional ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia. Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EndoTrac or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience, tumor size, tumor location, and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the completion of resection. Other outcomes will include the rates of adverse events and pathological curability.

DISCUSSION

The ability of EndoTrac ESD to reduce the long procedure time and/or adverse events observed with conventional ESD can not only reduce physical stress on the patient, but can also reduce length of hospital stay and medical costs. Reduced technical difficulty will contribute to the widespread adoption of this ESD technique worldwide.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: 000044450; Registered on June 6, 2021.https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050485.

PROTOCOL VERSION NUMBER

1.1, March 1, 2022. Patient enrolment began on June 6, 2021 and is expected to be completed by July 19, 2025.

摘要

简介

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一种用于整块切除胃肠道表面肿瘤的先进治疗技术。尽管胃 ESD 具有微创性且能获得良好的治疗效果,但它在技术上具有难度,且需要较长的手术时间来进行剥离。牵引辅助方法克服了胃 ESD 的一些困难,但它是否能缩短手术时间仍不清楚。在整个人群中,使用牙线和夹子的牵引辅助方法并没有缩短手术时间,但对于局限于胃上或中 1/3 大弯侧的病变,它可以缩短手术时间。虽然夹子拉线法的牵引方向可能仅限于贲门的口腔侧,但 EndoTrac ESD 可能在手术过程中的任何时候提供灵活的牵引。本前瞻性随机对照研究旨在比较 EndoTrac 和常规胃 ESD 的疗效和安全性。

方法/设计:这项多中心、随机对照试验将在日本的 2 家医院纳入 150 名接受 EndoTrac 或常规 ESD 治疗胃上皮性肿瘤的患者。符合纳入和排除标准的单个胃上皮性肿瘤患者将被随机分为 EndoTrac 或常规 ESD 组。患者将通过计算机生成的随机序列、按操作者经验、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置和机构进行分层进行随机分组。主要终点是 ESD 手术时间,定义为从黏膜下注射开始到切除完成的时间。其他结局包括不良事件和病理完全缓解率。

讨论

EndoTrac ESD 能够缩短与常规 ESD 相关的较长手术时间和/或不良事件,不仅可以减轻患者的身体负担,还可以缩短住院时间和医疗费用。技术难度的降低将有助于该 ESD 技术在全球范围内的广泛应用。

试验注册

大学医院医学信息网临床试验注册(UMIN-CTR),ID:000044450;注册于 2021 年 6 月 6 日。https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050485。

方案版本号

1.1,2022 年 3 月 1 日。患者招募于 2021 年 6 月 6 日开始,预计于 2025 年 7 月 19 日完成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8844/9276441/f117fcee4012/medi-101-e29172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8844/9276441/606e047c478f/medi-101-e29172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8844/9276441/7d2b96b69ecf/medi-101-e29172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8844/9276441/f117fcee4012/medi-101-e29172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8844/9276441/606e047c478f/medi-101-e29172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8844/9276441/7d2b96b69ecf/medi-101-e29172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8844/9276441/f117fcee4012/medi-101-e29172-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial.牵引法与传统内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃上皮性肿瘤的随机对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Apr 1;101(13):e29172. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029172.
2
Multicenter randomized control study of the efficacy of SO clip in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). (SO clip study in colorectal ESD): Randomized controlled trial.多中心随机对照研究 SO 夹在结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)中的疗效。(SO 夹在结直肠 ESD 中的研究):随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 12;102(19):e33756. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033756.
3
Comparison of the procedure time differences between hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (Hybrid-G trial).比较早期胃癌患者行内镜黏膜下剥离术与杂交内镜黏膜下剥离术的手术时间差异:一项多中心随机对照试验研究方案(Hybrid-G 试验)
Trials. 2022 Feb 21;23(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06099-x.
4
Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (with video).常规内镜黏膜下剥离术与牵引辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃肿瘤的对比:一项多中心、随机对照临床试验(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1231-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.031. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection with dental floss clip traction for gastric epithelial neoplasia: a pilot study (with video).牙线夹牵引内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃上皮性肿瘤的疗效:一项前瞻性研究(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):3100-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4580-4. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
6
Efficacy of the traction method for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial (with videos).胃内镜黏膜下剥离术牵引方法的疗效:一项随机对照试验(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Aug;100(2):307-311.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
Comparing a conventional and a spring-and-loop with clip traction method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasms: a randomized controlled trial (with videos).比较传统方法和圈套器-弹性结扎夹法内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃黏膜浅层肿瘤的随机对照研究(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 May;93(5):1097-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.049. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
8
Randomised controlled, patient-blinded, multicentre, superiority trial to evaluate the efficacy of the line-attached sheath-type traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with superficial gastric neoplasms.随机对照、患者盲法、多中心、优效性试验,旨在评估线附鞘型牵引装置在治疗胃黏膜浅层肿瘤患者内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 17;14(4):e078974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078974.
9
Efficacy of traction-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clip-and-thread technique: A prospective randomized study.夹线辅助牵引式经内镜结肠直肠黏膜下剥离术的疗效:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Endosc. 2018 Jul;30(4):467-476. doi: 10.1111/den.13036. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
10
[Application of dental floss traction-assisted endoscopic submucosa dissection to rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm].牙线牵引辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术在直肠神经内分泌肿瘤中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 25;22(4):377-382. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.04.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and prognosis analysis of pulley traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection with dental floss for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions.牙线辅助滑轮牵引内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌及癌前病变的疗效与预后分析
Front Surg. 2025 Jul 21;12:1477658. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1477658. eCollection 2025.
2
Hemoclip-suture-rubber band traction improves efficiency of colonic ESD: a randomized controlled trial.金属夹-缝合-橡皮筋牵引提高结肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的效率:一项随机对照试验
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jul 30;29(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03194-4.
3
Impact of gastric neoplasms location on clinical outcome of patients treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection.
胃肿瘤位置对接受内镜黏膜下剥离术患者临床结局的影响
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):107911. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107911.
4
Application of in vivo traction-assisted resection of large gastric mucosal lesions: a case series (with video).体内牵引辅助切除大的胃黏膜病变的应用:病例系列(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):5406-5412. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11931-x. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
5
Efficacy of a novel traction method: outside-lesion clip-thread method for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection of lesions of the greater curvature of the upper/middle stomach (with video).新型牵引方法的疗效:胃内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗上/中胃大弯病变的外病灶夹线法(附视频)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5464-5473. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11165-3. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
6
The Role of Specialized Instruments for Advanced Endoscopic Resections in Gastrointestinal Disease.专业器械在胃肠道疾病高级内镜切除术中的作用
Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 7;13(11):2177. doi: 10.3390/life13112177.
7
A novel method of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a threaded clip for a lesion of the greater curvature of the gastric body.一种使用带线夹子对胃体大弯处病变进行内镜下黏膜下剥离的新方法。
Endoscopy. 2023 Dec;55(S 01):E623-E624. doi: 10.1055/a-2051-7850. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
8
Efficacy and safety of esophageal submucosal tumors treated with internal traction method-assisted submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled study.内牵引法辅助黏膜下隧道内镜切除术治疗食管黏膜下肿瘤的疗效及安全性:一项单中心、单盲、随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2873-2884. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09813-7. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
9
Advancing endoscopic traction techniques in endoscopic submucosal dissection.推进内镜下黏膜下剥离术中的内镜牵引技术。
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;12:1059636. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1059636. eCollection 2022.