Leng X, Wang W, Wang F, Cang H, Gao Y, Liu H, Sun Y
Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Jiangyin, 214400, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Pathology, Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Jiangyin, 214400, Jiangsu, China.
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jul 30;29(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03194-4.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel, simple internal traction method using a hemoclip, suture, and rubber band during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colonic lesions.
A total of 96 patients undergoing ESD at Jiangyin Hospital Affiliated with Nantong University between January 2021 and December 2024 were randomized into two groups: Group A (n = 48) underwent conventional ESD, while Group B (n = 48) underwent ESD with hemoclip-suture-rubber band traction. The study included patients with early stage colon cancer, precancerous lesions (e.g., adenomas with high-grade dysplasia), and neuroendocrine tumors. Outcome measures included total procedure time, mucosal dissection time, number of submucosal injections, en bloc resection rate, adverse events, and the size of lesion area.
The hemoclip-suture-rubber band traction group (Group B) demonstrated significantly shorter total procedure time (72.63 ± 34.14 min versus 85.13 ± 38.18 min, P < 0.05) and mucosal dissection time (53.56 ± 29.03 min versus 71.63 ± 39.18 min, P < 0.001) compared with the conventional ESD group (Group A). Group B also required significantly fewer submucosal injections (1.63 ± 1.23 versus 4.75 ± 1.62, P < 0.001). Lesions in Group B were significantly larger (7.650 [2.857, 10.386] cm versus 4.895 [2.062, 6.774] cm, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in en bloc resection rate or adverse events between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, in Group B, two patients experienced intraoperative muscularis propria injury (2/48, 4.2%) and presented with postoperative abdominal pain.
The hemoclip-suture-rubber band traction technique facilitates colonic ESD by reducing procedure time and the need for submucosal injections, especially in larger lesions.While overall safety is comparable to conventional ESD, the potential for muscularis propria injury warrants further study in larger, multicenter trials.This simple and effective method holds promise for improving the efficiency and potentially the safety of colonic ESD.
本研究的目的是评估一种新型、简单的内部牵引方法,即在结肠病变内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)中使用止血夹、缝线和橡皮筋的有效性和安全性。
2021年1月至2024年12月期间在南通大学附属江阴医院接受ESD的96例患者被随机分为两组:A组(n = 48)接受传统ESD,而B组(n = 48)接受止血夹-缝线-橡皮筋牵引ESD。该研究纳入了早期结肠癌、癌前病变(如高级别异型增生腺瘤)和神经内分泌肿瘤患者。观察指标包括总手术时间、黏膜剥离时间、黏膜下注射次数、整块切除率、不良事件以及病变面积大小。
与传统ESD组(A组)相比,止血夹-缝线-橡皮筋牵引组(B组)的总手术时间(72.63 ± 34.14分钟 vs 85.13 ± 38.18分钟,P < 0.05)和黏膜剥离时间(53.56 ± 29.03分钟 vs 71.63 ± 39.18分钟,P < 0.001)显著缩短。B组的黏膜下注射次数也显著减少(1.63 ± 1.23 vs 4.75 ± 1.62,P < 0.001)。B组的病变显著更大(7.650 [2.857, 10.386] cm vs 4.895 [2.062, 6.774] cm,P < 0.05)。两组之间的整块切除率或不良事件无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。然而,在B组中,有两名患者术中出现固有肌层损伤(2/48,4.2%)并出现术后腹痛。
止血夹-缝线-橡皮筋牵引技术通过减少手术时间和黏膜下注射需求,促进了结肠ESD,尤其是在较大病变中。虽然总体安全性与传统ESD相当,但固有肌层损伤的可能性值得在更大规模的多中心试验中进一步研究。这种简单有效的方法有望提高结肠ESD的效率并可能提高其安全性。