Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266802. eCollection 2022.
eHealth has grown exponentially alongside technology and has become widely accessed by some populations, but little is documented about how undergraduate students use eHealth or perceive their eHealth literacy. As access to online information and non-traditional options for interacting with providers has increased, patient views of the provider-patient relationship may also be changing. This study evaluates how frequently undergraduates use eHealth, how they perceive their ability to use eHealth appropriately, and how they view their patient-provider relationships. A mixed methods approach was used to address the research questions, with quantitative data from a survey and qualitative data from follow-up interviews of twelve of the survey respondents. The survey was distributed to over 650 undergraduate students in introductory biology laboratory courses for students of all fields of interest at one university. Based on 527 survey responses and 12 interviews, students reported commonly using eHealth but being skeptical of telehealth appointments. Although students generally felt capable of finding and interpreting eHealth sources, they were not strongly confident in their ability to do so. Use of eHealth was not seen as altering the patient-provider relationship, but students expressed a desire for their physician to act more as a counselor or advisor than a guardian. Students from minority populations were more likely to use eHealth in comparison to their peers. In addition, student comfort with their provider differed by race and ethnicity, as well as whether they shared the same gender identity as their provider. This research highlights how undergraduate students, who are often making medical decisions for themselves for the first time as adults, access health information and view the patient-provider relationship differently than the traditional guardian or paternalistic model. In addition, having diverse, culturally competent medical providers are critical for students to develop the relationship with their provider that they desire.
电子健康随着技术的发展呈指数级增长,并已被一些人群广泛使用,但关于本科生如何使用电子健康或感知自己的电子健康素养的文献却很少。随着在线信息的获取和与提供者进行非传统互动方式的增加,患者对医患关系的看法也可能发生变化。本研究评估了本科生使用电子健康的频率、他们对自己适当使用电子健康的能力的看法,以及他们对医患关系的看法。本研究采用混合方法来解决研究问题,定量数据来自问卷调查,定性数据来自对 12 名调查受访者的后续访谈。该调查分发给一所大学不同专业领域对入门生物学实验课程感兴趣的 650 多名本科生。基于 527 份调查回复和 12 次访谈,学生报告说他们经常使用电子健康,但对远程医疗预约持怀疑态度。尽管学生普遍认为自己有能力找到和解释电子健康资源,但他们对自己的能力并不十分有信心。电子健康的使用并没有改变医患关系,但学生们希望医生更多地充当顾问或建议者,而不是监护人。与同龄人相比,少数族裔学生更有可能使用电子健康。此外,学生对提供者的舒适度因种族和民族以及他们与提供者是否具有相同的性别认同而有所不同。本研究强调了本科生作为成年人首次为自己做出医疗决策时,如何以不同于传统监护人或家长式模式的方式获取健康信息并看待医患关系。此外,拥有多样化、文化上胜任的医疗提供者对于学生与提供者建立他们所期望的关系至关重要。