Graduate School, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan; Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-Ku, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan; Department of Physical Therapy, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata City, Niigata 950-3198, Japan.
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jun;100:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) are two methods of noninvasively modulating cortical excitability below the placed electrode. Anodal tDCS over the cerebellum has been shown to modulate cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI), which is an indication of cerebellar excitability, but does not alter contralateral M1 excitability. However, the effect of tRNS over the cerebellum has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was thus to compare the effects of tDCS and tRNS over the cerebellum on CBI and the contralateral motor evoked potentials (MEPs), as well as on the relationship between CBI and contralateral MEPs. A total of 15 healthy subjects completed four-condition transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) interventions (anodal tDCS_1 mA, anodal tDCS_2 mA, tRNS, and Sham) on separate days. CBI and MEPs were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) before and after the 20 min tES intervention. For all conditions, there were no significant differences before and after tES in CBI or contralateral MEPs. In contrast, following tRNS, changes in CBI and MEPs were significantly correlated. No significant correlations were found in the other three conditions, indicating that cerebellar tDCS and tRNS have distinct effects on the relationship between CBI and contralateral MEPs. Taken together, these findings suggest that cerebellar tRNS may modulate the cerebellar to contralateral M1 pathway.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)是两种非侵入性调节置于电极下方皮质兴奋性的方法。小脑阳极 tDCS 已被证明可调节小脑脑抑制(CBI),这是小脑兴奋性的一个指标,但不会改变对侧 M1 兴奋性。然而,小脑 tRNS 的作用尚未得到研究。因此,本研究旨在比较小脑 tDCS 和 tRNS 对 CBI 和对侧运动诱发电位(MEPs)的影响,以及 CBI 和对侧 MEPs 之间的关系。共有 15 名健康受试者在不同天完成了四项经颅电刺激(tES)干预(阳极 tDCS_1 mA、阳极 tDCS_2 mA、tRNS 和假刺激)。在 tES 干预前后使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)测量 CBI 和 MEPs。对于所有条件,tES 前后 CBI 或对侧 MEPs 均无显著差异。相比之下,在 tRNS 后,CBI 和 MEPs 的变化呈显著相关。在其他三种情况下未发现显著相关性,表明小脑 tDCS 和 tRNS 对 CBI 和对侧 MEPs 之间的关系具有不同的影响。总之,这些发现表明小脑 tRNS 可能调节小脑到对侧 M1 通路。