文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.

作者信息

Laczó Bence, Antal Andrea, Rothkegel Holger, Paulus Walter

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(3):403-10. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130367.


DOI:10.3233/RNN-130367
PMID:24576783
Abstract

PURPOSE: Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) can increase the excitability of hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of tRNS and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the leg motor cortex. METHOD: Ten healthy subjects received anodal, cathodal tDCS, tRNS and sham stimulation for 10 min using 2 mA intensity during separate experimental sessions. Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced motor evoked potential (MEP) measurements were used to assess motor cortical excitability changes after the stimulation. RESULTS: Similar to the hand area, we found that both tRNS and anodal tDCS induced an increase of the amplitude of the MEPs. Anodal tDCS induced a constant gradual increase of corticospinal excitability until 60 min post-stimulation, whereas the effect of tRNS was immediate with a duration of 40 min following stimulation. The cathodal tDCS induced decrease in MEP amplitude did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that although the leg area has a deeper position in the cortex compared to the hand area, it can be reached by weak transcranial currents. Both anodal tDCS and tRNS had comparable effect on cortical excitability.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014

[2]
Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.

J ECT. 2015-3

[3]
Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

J Neurophysiol. 2009-8-19

[4]
Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.

Neuroscience. 2010-1-18

[5]
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex.

Exp Brain Res. 2007-9

[6]
Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.

Neuroimage. 2013-7-9

[7]
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.

Exp Brain Res. 2004-6

[8]
Comparative study of motor cortical excitability changes following anodal tDCS or high-frequency tRNS in relation to stimulation duration.

Physiol Rep. 2020-10

[9]
Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates motor responses evoked by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Neurosci Lett. 2012-6-23

[10]
Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.

Brain Res. 2013-7-24

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparing the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex on motor performance in men vs. women: a randomized controlled crossover study.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2025-8-8

[2]
Differing effectiveness of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: a randomized controlled trial.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024-10-14

[3]
The effects of prefrontal tDCS and hf-tRNS on the processing of positive and negative emotions evoked by video clips in first- and third-person.

Sci Rep. 2024-4-5

[4]
Hasty sensorimotor decisions rely on an overlap of broad and selective changes in motor activity.

PLoS Biol. 2022-4

[5]
Different paradigms of transcranial electrical stimulation improve motor function impairment and striatum tissue injuries in the collagenase-induced intracerebral hemorrhage rat model.

BMC Neurosci. 2022-1-29

[6]
Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Modulates Neural Processing of Sensory and Motor Circuits, from Potential Cellular Mechanisms to Behavior: A Scoping Review.

eNeuro. 2022

[7]
Ameliorative Effects of Different Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Paradigms on the Novel Object Recognition Task in a Rat Model of Alzheimer Disease.

Galen Med J. 2019-3-30

[8]
Limited Sensitivity of Hippocampal Synaptic Function or Network Oscillations to Unmodulated Kilohertz Electric Fields.

eNeuro. 2020

[9]
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Maximum Isometric Force Production during Isometric Barbell Squats.

Brain Sci. 2020-4-14

[10]
Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS): a wide range of frequencies is needed for increasing cortical excitability.

Sci Rep. 2019-10-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索