• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅随机噪声刺激与经颅直流电刺激对运动皮质兴奋性影响的比较。

Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.

作者信息

Ho Kerrie-Anne, Taylor Janet L, Loo Colleen K

机构信息

From the *School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Black Dog Institute, †Neuroscience Research Australia and School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, and ‡Department of Psychiatry, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J ECT. 2015 Mar;31(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000155.

DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000000155
PMID:25010032
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) with and without a direct current (DC) offset on motor cortical excitability and compare results to transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS).

METHODS

Fifteen healthy participants were tested in a within-subjects design. Motor-evoked potentials were measured before and up to 90 minutes after stimulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Five stimulation conditions were examined: sham, 1-mA tDCS, 2-mA tDCS, 2-mA tRNS (with no DC offset), and 2-mA tRNS + 1-mA DC offset.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the stimulation conditions. An analysis of individual stimulation conditions found that there was a significant increase in motor-evoked potential amplitudes after 1-mA tDCS, 2-mA tDCS, and 2-mA tRNS + DC offset when compared with baseline. Sham and 2-mA tRNS did not result in changes in cortical excitability.

CONCLUSIONS

Although differences between the stimulation conditions did not reach a statistical significance, the findings suggest that stimulation involving a DC (tDCS and tRNS + DC offset) but not solely tRNS is more likely to lead to increases in cortical excitability.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是检验有无直流偏移的经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)对运动皮质兴奋性的影响,并将结果与经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)进行比较。

方法

15名健康参与者采用受试者内设计进行测试。使用经颅磁刺激在刺激前及刺激后长达90分钟测量运动诱发电位。检查了五种刺激条件:假刺激、1毫安tDCS、2毫安tDCS、2毫安tRNS(无直流偏移)和2毫安tRNS + 1毫安直流偏移。

结果

刺激条件之间无显著差异。对个体刺激条件的分析发现,与基线相比,1毫安tDCS、2毫安tDCS和2毫安tRNS + 直流偏移后运动诱发电位幅度显著增加。假刺激和2毫安tRNS未导致皮质兴奋性改变。

结论

虽然刺激条件之间的差异未达到统计学显著性,但研究结果表明,涉及直流电的刺激(tDCS和tRNS + 直流偏移)而非单纯的tRNS更有可能导致皮质兴奋性增加。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.经颅随机噪声刺激与经颅直流电刺激对运动皮质兴奋性影响的比较。
J ECT. 2015 Mar;31(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000155.
2
Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.通过经颅高频随机噪声刺激提高人类腿部运动皮层兴奋性。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(3):403-10. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130367.
3
Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.2mA 经颅直流电刺激后的个体内反应一致性和可靠性。
Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov-Dec;9(6):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
4
Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study.前额叶、运动和躯体感觉皮层阴极经颅直流电刺激对皮层兴奋性和疼痛感知的不同影响——一项双盲随机假刺激对照研究。
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Oct;42(7):2426-37. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13043. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
5
Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over the cerebellum differentially affect the cerebellum and primary motor cortex pathway.经颅直流电刺激和经颅随机噪声刺激小脑对小脑和初级运动皮层通路的影响不同。
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jun;100:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
Comparative study of motor cortical excitability changes following anodal tDCS or high-frequency tRNS in relation to stimulation duration.刺激时长与经颅直流电刺激或高频经颅磁刺激后运动皮质兴奋性变化的比较研究。
Physiol Rep. 2020 Oct;8(19):e14595. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14595.
7
Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.经颅随机噪声刺激比经颅直流电刺激更能有效增强健康个体的工作记忆:行为和电生理证据。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):1370-1380. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Exploring parameters of gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and full-spectrum transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on human pharyngeal cortical excitability.探讨伽马经颅交流电刺激(tACS)和全频谱经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)对人类咽皮质兴奋性的参数影响。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Sep;33(9):e14173. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14173. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
9
Analgesia induced by anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS over the motor cortex: Immediate and sustained effects on pain perception.经颅直流电刺激和高频经颅磁刺激运动皮层诱导的镇痛:对疼痛感知的即时和持续影响。
Brain Stimul. 2021 Sep-Oct;14(5):1174-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
10
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)电极大小和电流强度对运动皮质兴奋性的影响:单次和重复刺激的证据
Brain Stimul. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex on motor performance in men vs. women: a randomized controlled crossover study.比较经颅随机噪声刺激和经颅直流电刺激对男性与女性运动皮层运动表现的影响:一项随机对照交叉研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Aug 8;19:1577899. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1577899. eCollection 2025.
2
No evidence of improvements in inhibitory control with tRNS.没有证据表明经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)能改善抑制控制能力。
Neuroimage Rep. 2021 Oct 1;1(4):100056. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100056. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Differing effectiveness of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: a randomized controlled trial.
经颅随机噪声刺激和经颅直流电刺激增强健康个体工作记忆的效果差异:一项随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Oct 14;21(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01481-z.
4
The distinct and potentially conflicting effects of tDCS and tRNS on brain connectivity, cortical inhibition, and visuospatial memory.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)对脑连接性、皮质抑制及视觉空间记忆的不同且可能相互冲突的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 May 30;18:1415904. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1415904. eCollection 2024.
5
High-Frequency Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation for Auditory Hallucinations of Schizophrenia: A Case Series.高频经颅随机噪声刺激治疗精神分裂症幻听:病例系列
Biomedicines. 2022 Oct 25;10(11):2698. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112698.
6
Performance after training in a complex cognitive task is enhanced by high-definition transcranial random noise stimulation.经高清颅直流电刺激训练后,复杂认知任务的表现得到提升。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 17;12(1):4618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08545-x.
7
Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Modulates Neural Processing of Sensory and Motor Circuits, from Potential Cellular Mechanisms to Behavior: A Scoping Review.经颅随机噪声刺激调节感觉和运动回路的神经处理:从潜在的细胞机制到行为:范围综述。
eNeuro. 2022 Jan 7;9(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0248-21.2021. Print 2022 Jan-Feb.
8
The Effect of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation on Cognitive Training Outcome in Healthy Aging.经颅随机噪声刺激对健康老年人认知训练结果的影响。
Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 9;12:625359. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.625359. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparative study of motor cortical excitability changes following anodal tDCS or high-frequency tRNS in relation to stimulation duration.刺激时长与经颅直流电刺激或高频经颅磁刺激后运动皮质兴奋性变化的比较研究。
Physiol Rep. 2020 Oct;8(19):e14595. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14595.
10
Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation for the Acute Treatment of Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial.经颅随机噪声刺激用于抑郁症的急性治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Apr 21;23(3):146-156. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz072.