• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

变革时代的质量保证:临床检验领域的改革与研究建议

Quality assurance in changing times: proposals for reform and research in the clinical laboratory field.

作者信息

Kenney M L

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1987 Feb;33(2 Pt 1):328-36.

PMID:3542302
Abstract

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recently commissioned a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness and appropriateness of federal clinical regulations. The analysis found that many federal regulations are technically obsolescent and many may be operationally unnecessary as a result of changing laboratory technology and changed federal reimbursement policies. Among changes recommended by the HHS-funded analysis are: the regulatory classification system based upon physical location of laboratories is no longer appropriate and should be replaced with a classification system reflecting laboratory functions; a single, uniform set of federal regulations should be developed that covers all civilian laboratories receiving federal reimbursement or operating in interstate commerce; a revised federal regulatory system should emphasize measures of performance such as personnel and inspection requirements; and clinical laboratory regulations should be based upon objective data to the maximum extent possible.

摘要

美国卫生与公众服务部最近委托对联邦临床法规的有效性和适当性进行了全面分析。分析发现,由于实验室技术的变化和联邦报销政策的改变,许多联邦法规在技术上已经过时,而且许多法规在操作上可能不再必要。由卫生与公众服务部资助的分析所建议的变革包括:基于实验室物理位置的监管分类系统不再合适,应被反映实验室功能的分类系统所取代;应制定一套统一的联邦法规,涵盖所有接受联邦报销或从事州际商业活动的民用实验室;修订后的联邦监管系统应强调人员和检查要求等绩效措施;临床实验室法规应尽可能基于客观数据。

相似文献

1
Quality assurance in changing times: proposals for reform and research in the clinical laboratory field.变革时代的质量保证:临床检验领域的改革与研究建议
Clin Chem. 1987 Feb;33(2 Pt 1):328-36.
2
The Medicare and Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act of 1967 proficiency testing requirements and its relationship to the private sector.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):357-62.
3
Federal reimbursement to laboratories.联邦政府对实验室的报销。
Clin Chem. 1996 May;42(5):817-21.
4
The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Program: not your ordinary regulatory program.临床实验室改进计划:并非普通的监管计划。
Mil Med. 2000 Jul;165(7 Suppl 2):48-51.
5
Good laboratory practices for biochemical genetic testing and newborn screening for inherited metabolic disorders.遗传代谢病生化遗传检测和新生儿筛查的良好实验室规范。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Apr 6;61(RR-2):1-44.
6
CLIA program; simplifying CLIA regulations relating to accreditation, exemption of laboratories under a state licensure program, proficiency testing, and inspection--HCFA. Final rule.临床实验室改进修正案(CLIA)计划;简化与认证、州许可计划下实验室的豁免、能力验证和检查相关的CLIA法规——医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 1998 May 14;63(93):26722-38.
7
Government practices and the medical practitioner.政府行为与执业医师
Urology. 1980 Mar;15(3):325-8. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(80)90460-4.
8
Federal regulations: compliance and implications.联邦法规:合规性与影响
Clin Lab Sci. 1997 Nov-Dec;10(6):339-46.
9
Federal regulation of clinical laboratories. A prospective public policy analysis.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1988 Apr;112(4):363-7.
10
Has compliance with CLIA requirements really improved quality in US clinical laboratories?遵守临床实验室改进修正案(CLIA)的要求真的提高了美国临床实验室的质量吗?
Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Aug 2;346(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2003.12.033.

引用本文的文献

1
The good, the bad, and the unknown: quality of clinical laboratories in Kampala, Uganda.良莠不齐:乌干达坎帕拉临床实验室的质量状况。
PLoS One. 2013 May 30;8(5):e64661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064661. Print 2013.