• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改变常规:采用患者主动随访以改进外科门诊。

Changing the routine: a move to patient initiated follow up to improve surgical outpatient clinic.

机构信息

The Department of General Surgery, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jun;92(6):1394-1400. doi: 10.1111/ans.17676. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1111/ans.17676
PMID:35429226
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9324913/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient initiated follow up (PIFU) allows patients to initiate a hospital follow up appointment on an 'as required' basis in contrast to the traditional physician-initiated model. We present a clinical pathway for patients referred with rectal bleeding at a large tertiary public hospital in South Auckland, New Zealand and demonstrate the utility of PIFU and its impact on reducing follow up appointments.

METHOD

The purpose of the pathway was to allow standardized care by the clinicians and allow for PIFU. Two separate protocols were developed - 'Painful PR bleeding' and 'Painless PR bleeding'. A new clinic (NC) was started following these protocols, and this was compared to historical controls (HC). The primary outcome was the rate of follow up appointments.

RESULTS

There were 133 patients in the NC and 135 in the HC, with significantly less follow ups in the NC (6% versus 45%, p < 0.0001). A small percentage of patients in the NC group were directly discharged (10%) whilst 70% of patients were discharged with a PIFU card. Thirty phone calls were made using PIFU, with 10 patients returning to clinic and 20 requiring advice and reassurance only. At 5 year follow up, there was a single colorectal malignancy found in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Initiating a protocol that includes patient initiated follow up vastly reduces the need for routine return to clinic for the majority of patients, without sacrificing patient care. A protocolised approach to clinic for other areas in general surgery should be considered.

摘要

简介

患者发起的随访(PIFU)允许患者根据需要发起医院随访预约,与传统的医生发起的模式形成对比。我们在新西兰南奥克兰的一家大型公立医院展示了一种针对直肠出血患者的临床路径,并展示了 PIFU 的实用性及其对减少随访预约的影响。

方法

该路径的目的是允许临床医生进行标准化护理,并允许 PIFU。制定了两个单独的方案 - “有疼痛的 PR 出血”和“无痛的 PR 出血”。根据这些方案开设了一个新的诊所(NC),并将其与历史对照(HC)进行比较。主要结果是随访预约的比率。

结果

NC 组有 133 名患者,HC 组有 135 名患者,NC 组的随访明显较少(6%对 45%,p<0.0001)。NC 组中有一小部分患者直接出院(10%),而 70%的患者出院时带有 PIFU 卡。使用 PIFU 进行了 30 次电话随访,其中 10 名患者返回诊所,20 名患者仅需要建议和安抚。在 5 年随访时,两组都发现了一例结直肠恶性肿瘤。

结论

实施包括患者发起的随访的方案极大地减少了大多数患者常规返回诊所的需求,而不会牺牲患者的护理。应该考虑在普外科的其他领域采用方案化的诊所方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042f/9324913/1e749d927fff/ANS-92-1394-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042f/9324913/e7cd0565921d/ANS-92-1394-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042f/9324913/1e749d927fff/ANS-92-1394-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042f/9324913/e7cd0565921d/ANS-92-1394-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042f/9324913/1e749d927fff/ANS-92-1394-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Changing the routine: a move to patient initiated follow up to improve surgical outpatient clinic.改变常规:采用患者主动随访以改进外科门诊。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jun;92(6):1394-1400. doi: 10.1111/ans.17676. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
2
Efficacy of patient-initiated follow-up clinics in secondary care: a systematic review.二级医疗中患者发起的随访诊所的疗效:一项系统评价。
Intern Med J. 2014 Dec;44(12a):1156-60. doi: 10.1111/imj.12533.
3
Patient initiated follow up in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: A systematic review.患者主导的妇产科随访:系统评价。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 May;272:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.181. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
4
'Paper Clinics'- a model for improving delivery of outpatient colorectal services.“纸质诊所”——改善门诊结直肠服务提供的一种模式。
Colorectal Dis. 2004 Jul;6(4):268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00640.x.
5
Patient-initiated follow up as a means of reducing pressures in secondary care.患者主导的随访作为减轻二级保健压力的一种手段。
Intern Med J. 2022 Apr;52(4):683-685. doi: 10.1111/imj.15741.
6
Reducing surgical outpatient waiting is not the solution to meeting the 2005 colorectal cancer target.减少外科门诊等待时间并非实现2005年结直肠癌目标的解决办法。
Colorectal Dis. 2006 Feb;8(2):135-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00900.x.
7
Patient-initiated follow-up in gynaecology: Patient and clinician views.患者主导的妇科随访:患者和临床医生的观点。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Jul;298:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.04.032. Epub 2024 May 2.
8
Clinicians' Views of Patient-initiated Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: a Qualitative Study to Inform the PETNECK2 Trial.临床医生对头颈癌患者主动随访的看法:一项定性研究,为 PETNECK2 试验提供信息。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022 Apr;34(4):230-240. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
9
Patient initiated follow-up in cancer patients: A systematic review.癌症患者的患者自主随访:一项系统综述。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 13;12:954854. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.954854. eCollection 2022.
10
Specific timely appointments for triage to reduce wait times in a medical outpatient clinic: protocol of a pre-post study with process evaluation.特定时间的分诊预约以减少医疗门诊的等待时间:一项前后研究的方案,包括过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4660-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of patient-initiated follow-up clinics in secondary care: a systematic review.二级医疗中患者发起的随访诊所的疗效:一项系统评价。
Intern Med J. 2014 Dec;44(12a):1156-60. doi: 10.1111/imj.12533.
2
Clinical pathways: unique contribution of family medicine.临床路径:家庭医学的独特贡献。
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Jun;59(6):705.
3
Extracolonic findings (ECF) on CT colonography (CTC) in patients presenting with colorectal symptoms.有结直肠症状患者的CT结肠成像(CTC)检查中的结肠外表现(ECF)。
Acta Radiol. 2013 Oct;54(8):851-62. doi: 10.1177/0284185113486371. Epub 2013 May 12.
4
Complacency or ignorance about rectal bleeding?对直肠出血的自满或忽视?
Colorectal Dis. 1999 Nov;1(6):332-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.1999.00088.x.
5
Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.计算机断层结肠成像与结肠镜检查用于疑似结直肠癌症状患者的检查(SIGGAR):一项多中心随机试验。
Lancet. 2013 Apr 6;381(9873):1194-202. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62186-2. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
6
The quality of the evidence base for clinical pathway effectiveness: room for improvement in the design of evaluation trials.临床路径有效性证据基础的质量:评估试验设计有改进的空间。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 18;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-80.
7
Most bowel cancer symptoms do not indicate colorectal cancer and polyps: a systematic review.大多数肠癌症状并不表示患有结直肠癌和息肉:系统评价。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 May 30;11:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-65.
8
The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: a systematic review.初级保健中症状对结直肠癌的诊断价值:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 May;61(586):e231-43. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X572427.
9
The effects of clinical pathways on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay, and hospital costs: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.临床路径对专业实践、患者结局、住院时间和医院成本的影响:Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eval Health Prof. 2012 Mar;35(1):3-27. doi: 10.1177/0163278711407313. Epub 2011 May 24.
10
Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠癌:CT 结肠成像和结肠镜检查的检测——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):393-405. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101887. Epub 2011 Mar 17.