Suppr超能文献

经桡动脉远段入路及桡动脉近段和远段的超声术后评估。

Distal radial access and postprocedural ultrasound evaluation of proximal and distal radial artery.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Oct;37(4):710-716. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00857-z. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the patency of the proximal and distal radial artery after coronary procedures performed via the distal radial artery (DRA). Ultrasound (US) as the most reliable method was used to diagnose radial artery occlusions (RAO). We evaluated 115 patients who underwent catheterization via distal radial access (dTRA). Following the procedure and after successful hemostasis (80 ± 36 min), arterial patency and diameter at conventional transradial access (cTRA) and distal puncture sites (either in the anatomical snuffbox or the dorsal distal RA) were assessed. No RAO were found in the proximal or distal RA and there were no significant other complications. The mean diameter of the radial artery at conventional puncture site was 2.86 ± 0.49 mm and at distal puncture site 2.31 ± 0.47 mm (p < 0.001). Postprocedural compression time of dTRA was very short. In conclusion distal radial access was associated with the absence of early arterial occlusion, significant local bleeding and other relevant complications.

摘要

本研究旨在评估经远端桡动脉(DRA)行冠状动脉介入治疗后桡动脉近段和远段的通畅性。超声(US)是诊断桡动脉闭塞(RAO)最可靠的方法。我们评估了 115 例经远端桡动脉入路(dTRA)进行导管插入术的患者。在成功止血(80±36 分钟)后,评估常规经桡动脉入路(cTRA)和远端穿刺部位(解剖鼻烟窝或桡动脉远段背侧)的动脉通畅性和直径。桡动脉近段和远段均未发现 RAO,也无其他明显并发症。常规穿刺部位桡动脉的平均直径为 2.86±0.49mm,远端穿刺部位为 2.31±0.47mm(p<0.001)。dTRA 的术后压迫时间非常短。总之,远端桡动脉入路与早期动脉闭塞、明显的局部出血和其他相关并发症无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验