• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桡动脉远端入路优化:一项针对解剖鼻烟壶区超声引导下桡动脉特征分析的前瞻性试验。

Distal Transradial Access Optimization: A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Characterization for the Anatomical Snuffbox.

作者信息

Koziński Łukasz, Orzałkiewicz Zbigniew, Zagożdżon Paweł, Dąbrowska-Kugacka Alicja

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Chojnice Specialist Hospital, Lesna 10, 89-600 Chojnice, Poland.

Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;14(18):2081. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182081.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14182081
PMID:39335760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11431388/
Abstract

The distal transradial approach (dTRA) is increasingly used in interventional cardiology. Doppler Ultrasound (DUS) effectively assesses radial artery (RA) characteristics. This study aims to identify specific RA DUS characteristics in patients undergoing coronary procedures via dTRA. : Participants from the ANTARES trial who completed the intervention per-protocol and retained RA patency were included. DUS was performed at baseline, 1 day, and 60 days post-procedure. : Among 400 participants, 348 had either dTRA (n = 169) or conventional transradial access (cTRA) (n = 179). Distal RA lumen diameter was 12% smaller than that of the proximal RA ( < 0.001). Men had a 14% larger distal RA diameter than women (2.33 ± 0.31 mm vs. 2.04 ± 0.27 mm, < 0.0001), similar to the proximal RA relationship. Peak flow velocities were similar between the sexes. Univariate linear regression showed that height, weight, body mass index, and body surface area (BSA) predicted arterial size, with BSA remaining significant in multivariate analysis (beta coefficient 0.62; confidence interval 0.49-0.75; < 0.0001). Distal RA diameter correlated positively with palpable pulse at the snuffbox and wrist. The dTRA resulted in an immediate 14% and 11% increase in distal and proximal RA diameter, respectively (both < 0.05). Sixty days after dTRA, the distal RA remained slightly dilated ( < 0.05), while the proximal RA returned to baseline. : Distal RA diameter is significantly associated with sex, measuring smaller than the forearm segment. A strong palpable pulse correlates with larger distal RA size. The dTRA induces RA lumen expansion. A thorough understanding of distal RA anatomy is essential for optimizing patient selection and refining techniques for transradial procedures.

摘要

远端桡动脉入路(dTRA)在介入心脏病学中的应用日益广泛。多普勒超声(DUS)可有效评估桡动脉(RA)特征。本研究旨在确定经dTRA行冠状动脉手术患者的特定RA DUS特征。:纳入ANTARES试验中按方案完成干预且保留RA通畅的参与者。在基线、术后1天和60天进行DUS检查。:在400名参与者中,348名采用了dTRA(n = 169)或传统桡动脉入路(cTRA)(n = 179)。远端RA管腔直径比近端RA小12%(<0.001)。男性的远端RA直径比女性大14%(2.33±0.31mm对2.04±0.27mm,<0.0001),与近端RA的情况相似。两性之间的峰值流速相似。单变量线性回归显示,身高、体重、体重指数和体表面积(BSA)可预测动脉大小,多变量分析中BSA仍具有显著性(β系数0.62;置信区间0.49 - 0.75;<0.0001)。远端RA直径与鼻烟壶处和腕部可触及脉搏呈正相关。dTRA导致远端和近端RA直径分别立即增加14%和11%(均<0.05)。dTRA术后60天,远端RA仍略有扩张(<0.05),而近端RA恢复至基线水平。:远端RA直径与性别显著相关,比前臂段小。强烈的可触及脉搏与较大的远端RA尺寸相关。dTRA可诱导RA管腔扩张。深入了解远端RA解剖结构对于优化经桡动脉手术的患者选择和改进技术至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/6be09732afd1/diagnostics-14-02081-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/12834e7066f4/diagnostics-14-02081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/b2b1f6344c84/diagnostics-14-02081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/d22ba199cdc7/diagnostics-14-02081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/5411e2e63cde/diagnostics-14-02081-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/7e9a1d7ba79e/diagnostics-14-02081-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/6be09732afd1/diagnostics-14-02081-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/12834e7066f4/diagnostics-14-02081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/b2b1f6344c84/diagnostics-14-02081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/d22ba199cdc7/diagnostics-14-02081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/5411e2e63cde/diagnostics-14-02081-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/7e9a1d7ba79e/diagnostics-14-02081-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/322f/11431388/6be09732afd1/diagnostics-14-02081-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Distal Transradial Access Optimization: A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Characterization for the Anatomical Snuffbox.桡动脉远端入路优化:一项针对解剖鼻烟壶区超声引导下桡动脉特征分析的前瞻性试验。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;14(18):2081. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182081.
2
Feasibility and Safety of the Routine Distal Transradial Approach in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Procedures: The ANTARES Randomized Trial.解剖学鼻烟壶区常规桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉介入手术的可行性与安全性:ANTARES随机试验
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 11;12(24):7608. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247608.
3
A Randomized Comparison of Radial Artery Intimal Hyperplasia Following Distal vs. Proximal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography: PRESERVE RADIAL Trial.冠状动脉造影远端与近端桡动脉入路后桡动脉内膜增生的随机对照比较:PRESERVE桡动脉试验
medRxiv. 2023 Jul 6:2023.07.05.23292274. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.05.23292274.
4
Distal radial access and postprocedural ultrasound evaluation of proximal and distal radial artery.经桡动脉远段入路及桡动脉近段和远段的超声术后评估。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Oct;37(4):710-716. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00857-z. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
5
A Randomized Comparison of Radial Artery Intimal Hyperplasia Following Distal Versus Proximal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography: PRESERVE RADIAL.冠状动脉造影远端与近端桡动脉入路后桡动脉内膜增生的随机对照比较:PRESERVE RADIAL研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e031504. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031504. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
6
Distal Transradial Access in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Interventional Coronary Procedures: Analysis of Access Site Pain and Complications.用于冠状动脉介入手术的解剖学鼻烟窝内的桡动脉远端入路:入路部位疼痛及并发症分析
Cureus. 2024 Feb 25;16(2):e54878. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54878. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Comparison of Distal Transradial Access in Anatomic Snuffbox Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography.经桡动脉解剖鼻烟窝入路与经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影的比较。
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Jun 12;23(4):E407-E410. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3041.
8
Distal Versus Conventional Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.经桡动脉入路(远段 vs. 常规)行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Oct;21(10):1209-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
9
Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese multicenter experience.桡动脉远心端入路在冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的有效性和安全性:一项日本多中心经验
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Apr;35(2):162-167. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00590-0. Epub 2019 May 24.
10
Outcomes of distal versus conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.经桡动脉远端与传统入路行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的结局比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;344:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural radial artery modifications following transradial access: Mechanisms, clinical implications, and preventive strategies.经桡动脉穿刺后桡动脉的结构改变:机制、临床意义及预防策略。
World J Cardiol. 2025 Jul 26;17(7):107772. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i7.107772.

本文引用的文献

1
A Randomized Comparison of Radial Artery Intimal Hyperplasia Following Distal Versus Proximal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography: PRESERVE RADIAL.冠状动脉造影远端与近端桡动脉入路后桡动脉内膜增生的随机对照比较:PRESERVE RADIAL研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e031504. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031504. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
2
Feasibility and Safety of the Routine Distal Transradial Approach in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Procedures: The ANTARES Randomized Trial.解剖学鼻烟壶区常规桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉介入手术的可行性与安全性:ANTARES随机试验
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 11;12(24):7608. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247608.
3
Distal Radial Approach in Coronary Angiography Using a Transdermal Nitroglycerin Patch: Double-Blinded Randomized Trial.
经皮硝酸甘油贴剂辅助下经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影术的研究:随机双盲对照试验
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 15;203:325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.068. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
The Role of Ultrasound in Accessing the Distal Radial Artery at the Anatomical Snuffbox for Cardiovascular Interventions.超声在心血管介入中经解剖学鼻烟窝处穿刺桡动脉远心端的作用。
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):25. doi: 10.3390/life13010025.
5
Application of ultrasound in cardiovascular intervention the distal radial artery approach: New wine in old bottles?超声在心血管介入中的应用——桡动脉远端入路:旧瓶装新酒?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 15;9:1019053. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1019053. eCollection 2022.
6
Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and/or Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和/或介入治疗的比较:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov 28;15(22):2297-2311. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.09.006.
7
A Meta-Analysis of Traditional Radial Access and Distal Radial Access in Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.经桡动脉途径进行经皮冠状动脉介入手术时传统桡动脉入路与桡动脉远端入路的Meta分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jan;46:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
8
Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization.评估和比较解剖学鼻烟窝与常规桡动脉在冠状动脉造影前的远端桡动脉直径。
Indian Heart J. 2022 Jul-Aug;74(4):322-326. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
9
Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial.远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路在冠状动脉造影和介入治疗中的比较:DISCO RADIAL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1191-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032. Epub 2022 May 17.
10
Distal radial access and postprocedural ultrasound evaluation of proximal and distal radial artery.经桡动脉远段入路及桡动脉近段和远段的超声术后评估。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Oct;37(4):710-716. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00857-z. Epub 2022 Apr 16.