• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西绝经后激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者应用 CDK4/6 抑制剂的成本-效用分析

Cost-Utility of the CDK 4/6 Inhibitors for Postmenopausal Women With Luminal Advanced Breast Cancer in Brazil.

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, NATS, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.

出版信息

Value Health Reg Issues. 2022 Sep;31:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2022.02.006
PMID:35429767
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Several trials have demonstrated the benefit of the CDK 4/6 inhibitors for postmenopausal women with luminal advanced breast cancer. This research aims to compare the cost-utility of the CDK 4/6 inhibitors in patients with no history of resistance to endocrine therapy.

METHODS

A Markov model was constructed to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of treatments from the Brazilian public health system perspective over a lifetime horizon (30 years) with 5% annual discount rate for both benefits and costs. Efficacy parameters were extracted from the pivotal studies. Costs were based on open data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The utilities were calculated according to the overall population preferences from a British study. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

The most cost-effective drug was ribociclib (US$50 748/QALY), followed by abemaciclib (US$64 052/QALY) and palbociclib (US$65 289/QALY). The univariate analysis showed that the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was mainly sensitive to the overall survival hazard ratio. The one thousand-probabilistic simulation showed that all ICUR values were above classical thresholds such as 1 to 3 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though there is no established willingness to pay threshold in Brazil, the estimated ICUR for CDK 4/6 inhibitors is >6 times the Brazilian GDP per capita (GDP per capita = US$5694.73), which might be a barrier to their inclusion in the Brazilian public health system.

摘要

目的

多项试验已证明 CDK4/6 抑制剂对激素受体阳性、绝经后晚期乳腺癌患者有益。本研究旨在比较 CDK4/6 抑制剂在无内分泌治疗耐药史患者中的成本效用。

方法

构建马尔可夫模型,从巴西公共卫生系统的角度,在 30 年的时间范围内(终生),采用 5%的年贴现率对治疗方案进行成本效用分析,贴现率分别用于计算效益和成本。从关键性研究中提取疗效参数。成本基于巴西卫生部的公开数据。效用值根据来自英国的一项研究中的总体人群偏好进行计算。确定性和概率敏感性分析评估了结果的稳健性。

结果

最具成本效益的药物是瑞博西利(每 QALY 50748 美元),其次是阿贝西利(每 QALY 64052 美元)和哌柏西利(每 QALY 65289 美元)。单变量分析表明,增量成本效用比(ICUR)主要对总生存风险比敏感。1000 次概率模拟表明,所有 ICUR 值均高于经典阈值,如每 QALY 1 至 3 个国内生产总值(GDP)。

结论

尽管巴西尚未确定支付意愿的阈值,但 CDK4/6 抑制剂的估计 ICUR 是巴西人均 GDP 的 6 倍以上(人均 GDP=5694.73 美元),这可能成为其纳入巴西公共卫生系统的障碍。

相似文献

1
Cost-Utility of the CDK 4/6 Inhibitors for Postmenopausal Women With Luminal Advanced Breast Cancer in Brazil.巴西绝经后激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者应用 CDK4/6 抑制剂的成本-效用分析
Value Health Reg Issues. 2022 Sep;31:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
2
Cost-effectiveness of ribociclib for premenopausal or perimenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a Brazilian public health care system perspective.从巴西公共卫生保健系统角度看,瑞博西尼用于绝经前或围绝经期HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌女性的成本效益
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Jun 20;14:17588359221100865. doi: 10.1177/17588359221100865. eCollection 2022.
3
Is Palbociclib a cost-effective strategy in the second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Iran?在伊朗,哌柏西利用于转移性乳腺癌二线治疗是否具有成本效益?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(10):1201-1210. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2263167. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Cost-effectiveness of Osimertinib vs Docetaxel-bevacizumab in Third-line Treatment in EGFR T790M Resistance Mutation Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China.奥希替尼对比多西他赛联合贝伐珠单抗三线治疗表皮生长因子受体 T790M 耐药突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌在中国的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2020 Nov;42(11):2159-2170.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.08.018. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
5
Economic Modelling of Screen-and-Treat Strategies for Brazilian Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.巴西遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险女性的筛查和治疗策略的经济模型
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):97-109. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00599-0.
6
Cost Effectiveness of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Pre-/Perimenopausal, HR+ and HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer: A Canadian Healthcare Perspective.来曲唑联合非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂治疗绝经前/围绝经期激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性的晚期乳腺癌的成本效果分析:加拿大医疗保健视角。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Jul;39(7):853-867. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01028-3. Epub 2021 May 18.
7
Cost Effectiveness of Ribociclib and Palbociclib in the Second-Line Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer in Post-Menopausal Indian Women.来曲唑与哌柏西利二线治疗绝经后激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性转移性乳腺癌的成本效果分析:来自真实世界印度人群数据
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jul;20(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00731-2. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Degarelix vs. leuprorelin for the treatment of prostate cancer in China: A cost-utility analysis.地加瑞克与亮丙瑞林治疗中国前列腺癌的成本效用分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 18;10:942800. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.942800. eCollection 2022.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in the Second-Line Treatment of Women With HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A US Payer Perspective.阿贝西利联合氟维司群用于HR+/HER2-晚期或转移性乳腺癌二线治疗的成本效益分析:美国医保支付方视角
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 2;8:658747. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.658747. eCollection 2021.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of palbociclib or ribociclib in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.帕博西尼或瑞博西尼治疗晚期激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性乳腺癌的成本效果分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jun;175(3):775-779. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05190-3. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: a Markov's model-based evaluation.CDK4/6抑制剂一线治疗激素受体阳性且人表皮生长因子受体2阴性晚期乳腺癌的成本效益比较分析:基于马尔可夫模型的评估
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 24;14:1413676. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1413676. eCollection 2024.
2
Brazilian breast cancer patient-reported outcomes: What really matters for these women.巴西乳腺癌患者报告的结局:这些女性真正关心的是什么。
Front Med Technol. 2022 Nov 21;4:809222. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.809222. eCollection 2022.