School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; Center for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; Center for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Clin Ther. 2020 Nov;42(11):2159-2170.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.08.018. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of osimertinib vs docetaxel and bevacizumab in third-line treatment in EGFR T790M resistance mutation advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China from the perspective of the health care system.
To explore modeling uncertainty, 2 different model methods (a Markov model and a partitioned survival [PS] model) were developed to simulate costs and health outcomes during a lifetime. Both models consisted of 3 health states: progression-free survival, postprogression survival, and death. Efficacy and safety data of osimertinib vs docetaxel and bevacizumab in patients who had acquired EGFR T790M resistance mutation were derived from a key head-to-head clinical trial. Cost and utility values were derived from local charges, the literature, the China Drug Bidding Database, and patients' health care documents. Two scenario analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the robustness of the results.
In the Markov model, compared with docetaxel and bevacizumab, osimertinib yielded 0.69 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an additional cost (in US dollars) of $17,311 for an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of $25,463 per QALY. In the PS model, osimertinib yielded an additional 0.69 QALYs with an incremental cost of $17,827 for an ICUR of $25,951 per QALY. From the Markov model, the ICUR was $29,416 per QALY in scenario 1 and $25,543 per QALY in scenario 2. From the PS model, the ICUR was $30,264 per QALY and $25,947 per QALY for scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, osimertinib treatment had a 21%-63% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $9777 to $29,330 per QALY (1-3 times the gross domestic product per capita).
The findings from the present analysis suggest that osimertinib could be cost-effective vs docetaxel and bevacizumab in third-line treatment in EGFR T790M resistance mutation advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China.
本研究旨在评估奥希替尼对比多西他赛联合贝伐珠单抗在 EGFR T790M 耐药突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌三线治疗中的成本效果,从卫生保健系统的角度出发。
为了探究模型不确定性,我们分别建立了两种不同的模型方法(Markov 模型和分割生存[PS]模型),以模拟整个生命周期的成本和健康结果。两种模型均包含 3 种健康状态:无进展生存期、进展后生存期和死亡。奥希替尼对比多西他赛联合贝伐珠单抗在获得 EGFR T790M 耐药突变的患者中的疗效和安全性数据来自一项关键性头对头临床试验。成本和效用值则源自当地费用、文献、中国药品招标数据库和患者的医疗保健文件。我们进行了两种情景分析和敏感性分析,以探究结果的稳健性。
在 Markov 模型中,与多西他赛联合贝伐珠单抗相比,奥希替尼在额外成本(以美元计)为 17311 美元的情况下,额外获得了 0.69 个质量调整生命年(QALY),增量成本效用比(ICUR)为每 QALY 25463 美元。在 PS 模型中,奥希替尼额外获得了 0.69 个 QALY,增量成本为 17827 美元,ICUR 为每 QALY 25951 美元。在 Markov 模型中,情景 1 的 ICUR 为每 QALY 29416 美元,情景 2 的 ICUR 为每 QALY 25543 美元。在 PS 模型中,情景 1 和情景 2 的 ICUR 分别为每 QALY 30264 美元和每 QALY 25947 美元。在概率敏感性分析中,奥希替尼治疗在支付意愿阈值为每 QALY9777 美元至 29330 美元(是人均国内生产总值的 1 至 3 倍)时,有 21%至 63%的概率具有成本效果。
本分析结果表明,奥希替尼在 EGFR T790M 耐药突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌三线治疗中可能具有成本效果,优于多西他赛联合贝伐珠单抗。