• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现役军人创伤后应激障碍团体或个体认知加工疗法治疗结果的预测因素

Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Group or Individual Cognitive Processing Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Active Duty Military.

作者信息

Resick Patricia A, LoSavio Stefanie T, Wachen Jennifer Schuster, Dillon Kirsten H, Nason Erica E, Dondanville Katherine A, Young-McCaughan Stacey, Peterson Alan L, Yarvis Jeffrey S, Mintz Jim

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 1121 West Chapel Hill Street, Durham, NC 27707, USA.

Women's Health Sciences Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Cognit Ther Res. 2020 Feb 27;44(3):611-620. doi: 10.1007/s10608-020-10085-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10608-020-10085-5
PMID:35431370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9009298/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine demographic, psychological, military, and deployment variables that might predict posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom improvement in a sample of active duty service members who received either group or individual cognitive processing therapy (CPT).

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 165 active duty service members with pre- and posttreatment data participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing group with individual CPT. Pretreatment variables were examined as predictors of change in PTSD severity from baseline to posttreatment, assessed using the PTSD Symptom Scale-Interview Version (PSS-I). Predictors of PSS-I change were first evaluated using Pearson correlations, followed by partial and multiple correlations to clarify which associations remained when effects of other predictors were controlled. Multiple regression analyses were used to test for interactions between pretreatment variables and treatment format.

RESULTS

Only age was a significant predictor of PTSD symptom change after controlling for other variables and statisitically correcting for testing multiple variables. There was also an interaction between age and treatment format.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger participants had greater symptom improvement, particularly if they received individual treatment. Other pretreatment variables did not predict outcome. CPT appears to be robust across most pretreatment variables, such that comorbid disorders, baseline symptom severity, and suicidal ideation do not interfere with application of CPT. However, individual CPT may be a better option particularly for younger service members.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨人口统计学、心理学、军事及部署相关变量,这些变量可能预测接受团体或个体认知加工疗法(CPT)的现役军人样本中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的改善情况。

方法

对165名有治疗前和治疗后数据的现役军人的数据进行分析,这些军人参与了一项将团体CPT与个体CPT进行比较的随机对照试验。将治疗前变量作为从基线到治疗后PTSD严重程度变化的预测因素进行检验,使用创伤后应激障碍症状量表访谈版(PSS-I)进行评估。首先使用Pearson相关性评估PSS-I变化的预测因素,随后进行偏相关和多重相关分析,以明确在控制其他预测因素的影响后哪些关联仍然存在。使用多元回归分析来检验治疗前变量与治疗形式之间的相互作用。

结果

在控制其他变量并对多个变量进行统计校正后,只有年龄是PTSD症状变化的显著预测因素。年龄与治疗形式之间也存在相互作用。

结论

较年轻的参与者症状改善更大,尤其是如果他们接受个体治疗。其他治疗前变量不能预测结果。CPT在大多数治疗前变量中似乎都很有效,以至于共病障碍、基线症状严重程度和自杀意念都不会干扰CPT的应用。然而,个体CPT可能是更好的选择,特别是对于较年轻的军人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3344/9009298/3d201d2ca2d9/nihms-1786477-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3344/9009298/3d201d2ca2d9/nihms-1786477-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3344/9009298/3d201d2ca2d9/nihms-1786477-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Group or Individual Cognitive Processing Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Active Duty Military.现役军人创伤后应激障碍团体或个体认知加工疗法治疗结果的预测因素
Cognit Ther Res. 2020 Feb 27;44(3):611-620. doi: 10.1007/s10608-020-10085-5.
2
Effect of Group vs Individual Cognitive Processing Therapy in Active-Duty Military Seeking Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.团体与个体认知加工治疗对寻求创伤后应激障碍治疗的现役军人的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):28-36. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2729.
3
A randomized clinical trial of group cognitive processing therapy compared with group present-centered therapy for PTSD among active duty military personnel.一项针对现役军人创伤后应激障碍的随机临床试验:团体认知加工疗法与团体以当下为中心疗法的比较
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Dec;83(6):1058-1068. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000016. Epub 2015 May 4.
4
Variable-length Cognitive Processing Therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in active duty military: Outcomes and predictors.变长度认知加工疗法治疗现役军人创伤后应激障碍:结局和预测因素。
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Jun;141:103846. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103846. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
The Impact of Hazardous Drinking Among Active Duty Military With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Does Cognitive Processing Therapy Format Matter?现役 PTSD 患者危险饮酒行为的影响:认知加工疗法的形式是否重要?
J Trauma Stress. 2021 Feb;34(1):210-220. doi: 10.1002/jts.22609. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
6
EVALUATING POTENTIAL IATROGENIC SUICIDE RISK IN TRAUMA-FOCUSED GROUP COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PTSD IN ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY PERSONNEL.评估以创伤为焦点的团体认知行为疗法对现役军人创伤后应激障碍治疗中潜在的医源性自杀风险。
Depress Anxiety. 2016 Jun;33(6):549-57. doi: 10.1002/da.22456. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
7
Effect of Written Exposure Therapy vs Cognitive Processing Therapy on Increasing Treatment Efficiency Among Military Service Members With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.书面暴露疗法与认知加工疗法对提高创伤后应激障碍军人治疗效率的影响:一项随机非劣效性试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2140911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40911.
8
Comparison of Prolonged Exposure vs Cognitive Processing Therapy for Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among US Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较延长暴露疗法与认知加工疗法治疗美国退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2136921. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36921.
9
Qualitative examination of cognitive change during PTSD treatment for active duty service members.现役军人创伤后应激障碍治疗期间认知变化的定性研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Apr;79:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
10
Testing a variable-length Cognitive Processing Therapy intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder in active duty military: Design and methodology of a clinical trial.测试针对现役军人创伤后应激障碍的可变长度认知加工疗法干预措施:一项临床试验的设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 May 23;15:100381. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100381. eCollection 2019 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment-related beliefs and reactions among trauma-focused therapy completers and discontinuers: A qualitative examination.创伤聚焦疗法完成者和中断者中与治疗相关的信念和反应:一项定性研究。
Psychol Serv. 2024 Nov;21(4):859-870. doi: 10.1037/ser0000831. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
2
Pretreatment characteristics associated with symptom reduction during group cognitive processing therapy versus exposure therapy for PTSD: an exploratory study of Veterans.与 PTSD 的团体认知加工治疗与暴露治疗相比,症状减轻相关的预处理特征:对退伍军人的探索性研究。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2024 Jan;53(1):70-86. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2023.2268277. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Group vs Individual Cognitive Processing Therapy in Active-Duty Military Seeking Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.团体与个体认知加工治疗对寻求创伤后应激障碍治疗的现役军人的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):28-36. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2729.
2
Residual sleep disturbances following PTSD treatment in active duty military personnel.现役军人创伤后应激障碍治疗后的残余睡眠障碍。
Psychol Trauma. 2016 Nov;8(6):697-701. doi: 10.1037/tra0000150. Epub 2016 May 30.
3
Group-delivered cognitive/exposure therapy for PTSD in women veterans: A randomized controlled trial.
Leveraging observational data to identify in-session patient and therapist predictors of cognitive processing therapy response and completion.
利用观察数据识别认知加工治疗反应和完成的会话内患者和治疗师预测因素。
J Trauma Stress. 2023 Apr;36(2):397-408. doi: 10.1002/jts.22924. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
4
More is not always better: 2 weeks of intensive cognitive processing therapy-based treatment are noninferior to 3 weeks.多并不总是好:2 周密集型认知加工疗法治疗并不劣于 3 周。
Psychol Trauma. 2023 Jan;15(1):100-109. doi: 10.1037/tra0001257. Epub 2022 May 12.
5
A narrative review of the epigenetics of post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder treatment.创伤后应激障碍的表观遗传学及创伤后应激障碍治疗的叙述性综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 7;13:857087. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857087. eCollection 2022.
针对女性退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的团体认知/暴露疗法:一项随机对照试验。
Psychol Trauma. 2016 May;8(3):404-412. doi: 10.1037/tra0000111. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
4
Concurrent treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and alcohol dependence: Predictors and moderators of outcome.创伤后应激障碍与酒精依赖的联合治疗:结果的预测因素与调节因素
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jan;84(1):43-56. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000052. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
5
A randomized clinical trial of group cognitive processing therapy compared with group present-centered therapy for PTSD among active duty military personnel.一项针对现役军人创伤后应激障碍的随机临床试验:团体认知加工疗法与团体以当下为中心疗法的比较
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Dec;83(6):1058-1068. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000016. Epub 2015 May 4.
6
Prevalence of, risk factors for, and consequences of posttraumatic stress disorder and other mental health problems in military populations deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.部署到伊拉克和阿富汗的军人中创伤后应激障碍和其他心理健康问题的流行率、风险因素和后果。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 May;17(5):37. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0575-z.
7
Comorbidity in the prediction of Cognitive Processing Therapy treatment outcomes for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder.共病对战斗相关创伤后应激障碍认知加工疗法治疗效果的预测。
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Mar;28(2):237-40. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
8
Manualized therapy for PTSD: flexing the structure of cognitive processing therapy.创伤后应激障碍的心理治疗手册:灵活运用认知加工疗法的结构。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Dec;80(6):968-81. doi: 10.1037/a0030600. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
9
Unit cohesion and PTSD symptom severity in Air Force medical personnel.空军医务人员的单位凝聚力与创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度
Mil Med. 2010 Jul;175(7):482-6. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00178.
10
Impact of race on early treatment termination and outcomes in posttraumatic stress disorder treatment.种族对创伤后应激障碍治疗中早期治疗终止和结局的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Aug;78(4):480-9. doi: 10.1037/a0019551.