• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Null-free False Discovery Rate Control Using Decoy Permutations.使用诱饵排列的无空值错误发现率控制
Acta Math Appl Sin. 2022;38(2):235-253. doi: 10.1007/s10255-022-1077-5. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
2
Local false discovery rate estimation with competition-based procedures for variable selection.基于竞争的变量选择方法的局部错误发现率估计。
Stat Med. 2024 Jan 15;43(1):61-88. doi: 10.1002/sim.9942. Epub 2023 Nov 5.
3
Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.通用诱饵分布简化了鸟枪法蛋白质组学中的错误发现率估计
J Proteome Res. 2022 Feb 4;21(2):339-348. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00600. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
4
A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.一种新的蛋白质水平假发现率估计方法。
BMC Genomics. 2018 Aug 13;19(Suppl 6):567. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4923-3.
5
Modeling Lower-Order Statistics to Enable Decoy-Free FDR Estimation in Proteomics.对低阶统计量进行建模以实现蛋白质组学中无诱饵的错误发现率估计。
J Proteome Res. 2023 Apr 7;22(4):1159-1171. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00604. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
6
Computationally efficient permutation-based confidence interval estimation for tail-area FDR.基于置换的尾部 FDR 置信区间的计算效率估计。
Front Genet. 2013 Sep 17;4:179. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00179. eCollection 2013.
7
Challenging Targets or Describing Mismatches? A Comment on Common Decoy Distribution by Madej et al.有挑战性的目标还是描述不匹配?对 Madej 等人常见诱饵分布的评论
J Proteome Res. 2022 Dec 2;21(12):2840-2845. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00279. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
8
Decoy-free protein-level false discovery rate estimation.无诱饵的蛋白质水平假发现率估计。
Bioinformatics. 2014 Mar 1;30(5):675-81. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt431. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.用于评估鸟枪法蛋白质组学中假阳性和错误发现率的诱饵方法。
Anal Chem. 2009 Jan 1;81(1):146-59. doi: 10.1021/ac801664q.
10
Group-walk: a rigorous approach to group-wise false discovery rate analysis by target-decoy competition.组步行:一种通过目标诱饵竞争进行组-wise 假发现率分析的严格方法。
Bioinformatics. 2022 Sep 16;38(Suppl_2):ii82-ii88. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac471.

引用本文的文献

1
Discovery of sparse, reliable omic biomarkers with Stabl.利用 Stabl 发现稀疏、可靠的组学生物标志物
Nat Biotechnol. 2024 Oct;42(10):1581-1593. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-02033-x. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
Stabl: sparse and reliable biomarker discovery in predictive modeling of high-dimensional omic data.Stabl:在高维组学数据的预测建模中进行稀疏且可靠的生物标志物发现。
Res Sq. 2023 Feb 28:rs.3.rs-2609859. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2609859/v1.
3
Clipper: p-value-free FDR control on high-throughput data from two conditions.Clipper:针对两种条件下高通量数据的 p 值自由 FDR 控制。
Genome Biol. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02506-9.

本文引用的文献

1
IPAD: Stable Interpretable Forecasting with Knockoffs Inference.IPAD:基于仿冒品推断的稳定可解释预测
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(532):1822-1834. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1654878. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
2
Beyond Target-Decoy Competition: Stable Validation of Peptide and Protein Identifications in Mass Spectrometry-Based Discovery Proteomics.超越靶标-诱饵竞争:基于质谱的发现蛋白质组学中肽和蛋白质鉴定的稳定验证。
Anal Chem. 2020 Nov 17;92(22):14898-14906. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00328. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
RANK: Large-Scale Inference with Graphical Nonlinear Knockoffs.RANK:基于图形非线性仿样的大规模推断
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(529):362-379. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1546589. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Proteomic and Metabolomic Characterization of COVID-19 Patient Sera.COVID-19 患者血清的蛋白质组学和代谢组学特征。
Cell. 2020 Jul 9;182(1):59-72.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Weighted False Discovery Rate Control in Large-Scale Multiple Testing.大规模多重检验中的加权错误发现率控制
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(523):1172-1183. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1336443. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Bias in False Discovery Rate Estimation in Mass-Spectrometry-Based Peptide Identification.基于质谱的肽鉴定中错误发现率估计的偏差。
J Proteome Res. 2019 May 3;18(5):2354-2358. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00991. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
7
Averaging Strategy To Reduce Variability in Target-Decoy Estimates of False Discovery Rate.平均策略可减少目标-诱饵估计假发现率的变异性。
J Proteome Res. 2019 Feb 1;18(2):585-593. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00802. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
8
A parametric model to estimate the proportion from true null using a distribution for p-values.一种使用p值分布从真零假设估计比例的参数模型。
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2017 Oct;114:105-118. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
9
Unbiased False Discovery Rate Estimation for Shotgun Proteomics Based on the Target-Decoy Approach.基于目标-诱饵法的鸟枪法蛋白质组学无偏错误发现率估计
J Proteome Res. 2017 Feb 3;16(2):393-397. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00144. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
10
A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.一种用于准确估计差异表达基因识别中错误发现率的通用方法。
Bioinformatics. 2014 Jul 15;30(14):2018-25. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu124. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

使用诱饵排列的无空值错误发现率控制

Null-free False Discovery Rate Control Using Decoy Permutations.

作者信息

He Kun, Li Meng-Jie, Fu Yan, Gong Fu-Zhou, Sun Xiao-Ming

机构信息

Iinstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190 China.

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049 China.

出版信息

Acta Math Appl Sin. 2022;38(2):235-253. doi: 10.1007/s10255-022-1077-5. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10255-022-1077-5
PMID:35431377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8994022/
Abstract

The traditional approaches to false discovery rate (FDR) control in multiple hypothesis testing are usually based on the null distribution of a test statistic. However, all types of null distributions, including the theoretical, permutation-based and empirical ones, have some inherent drawbacks. For example, the theoretical null might fail because of improper assumptions on the sample distribution. Here, we propose a null distribution-free approach to FDR control for multiple hypothesis testing in the case-control study. This approach, named , simply builds on the ordering of tests by some statistic or score, the null distribution of which is not required to be known. Competitive decoy tests are constructed from permutations of original samples and are used to estimate the false target discoveries. We prove that this approach controls the FDR when the score function is symmetric and the scores are independent between different tests. Simulation demonstrates that it is more stable and powerful than two popular traditional approaches, even in the existence of dependency. Evaluation is also made on two real datasets, including an arabidopsis genomics dataset and a COVID-19 proteomics dataset.

摘要

在多重假设检验中,传统的错误发现率(FDR)控制方法通常基于检验统计量的零分布。然而,所有类型的零分布,包括理论型、基于排列型和经验型的,都有一些固有缺陷。例如,理论零假设可能会因为对样本分布的假设不当而失效。在此,我们提出一种在病例对照研究中用于多重假设检验的FDR控制的无零分布方法。这种方法,名为 ,简单地基于某个统计量或分数对检验进行排序构建,其零分布无需已知。竞争性诱饵检验由原始样本的排列构建而成,并用于估计错误的目标发现。我们证明,当分数函数对称且不同检验之间的分数相互独立时,该方法可控制FDR。模拟表明,即使存在依赖性,它也比两种流行的传统方法更稳定、更强大。我们还对两个真实数据集进行了评估,包括一个拟南芥基因组学数据集和一个COVID - 19蛋白质组学数据集。