Suppr超能文献

精神病超高风险参与者的识别与预测分析:三种心理测量诊断访谈的比较

Identification and predictive analysis for participants at ultra-high risk of psychosis: A comparison of three psychometric diagnostic interviews.

作者信息

Wang Peng, Yan Chuan-Dong, Dong Xiao-Jie, Geng Lei, Xu Chao, Nie Yun, Zhang Sheng

机构信息

Department of Psychological Rehabilitation, the Affiliated Wuhan Mental Health Center, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2022 Mar 16;10(8):2420-2428. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2420.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An accurate identification of individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) based on psychometric tools to prospectively identify psychosis as early as possible is required for indicated preventive intervention. The diagnostic comparability of several psychometric tools, including the comprehensive assessment of at risk mental state (CAARMS), the structured interview for psychosis-risk syndrome (SIPS) and the bonn scale for the assessment of basic symptoms (BSABS), is unknown.

AIM

To address the psychometric comparability of CAARMS, SIPS and BSABS for subjects who are close relatives of patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

In total, 189 participants aged 18-58 years who were lineal relative by blood and collateral relatives by blood up to the third degree of kinship of patients with schizophrenia were interviewed in the period of May 2017 to January 2019. Relatives of the participants diagnosed schizophrenia were excluded. All the participants were assessed for a UHR state by three psychometric tools (CAARMS, SIPS and BSABS). The psychometric diagnosis results included at risk of psychosis (UHR+), not at risk of psychosis (UHR-) and psychosis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were also measured. The inter-rater agreement was assessed for evaluation of the coherence of the three scales. Transition rates for UHR+ subjects to psychosis within 2 years were also recorded.

RESULTS

The overall agreement percentages were 93.12%, 92.06% and 93.65% of CAARMS and SIPS, SIPS and BSABS and CAARMS and BSABS, respectively. The overall agreement percentage of the relative functional impairment of the three groups (UHR+, not at risk of psychosis and psychosis) were 89.24%, 86.36% and 88.12%, respectively. The inter-rater reliability of the CAARMS, SIPS and BSABS total score was 0.90, 0.89 and 0.85. The inter-rater reliability was very good to excellent for all the subscales of these three instruments. For CAARMS, SIPS and BSABS, the kappa coefficient about UHR criteria agreement was 0.87, 0.84 and 0.82, respectively ( < 0.001). The transition rates of UHR+ to psychosis within 2 years were 16.7% (CAARMS), 10.0% (SIPS) and 17.7% (BSABS).

CONCLUSION

There is good diagnostic agreement between the CAARMS, SIPS and BSABS towards identification of UHR participants who are close relatives of patients with schizophrenia.

摘要

背景

为了进行有针对性的预防性干预,需要基于心理测量工具准确识别超高风险(UHR)个体,以便尽早前瞻性地识别精神病。包括高危精神状态综合评估(CAARMS)、精神病风险综合征结构化访谈(SIPS)和基本症状评估波恩量表(BSABS)在内的几种心理测量工具的诊断可比性尚不清楚。

目的

探讨CAARMS、SIPS和BSABS在精神分裂症患者近亲中的心理测量可比性。

方法

2017年5月至2019年1月期间,共对189名年龄在18 - 58岁之间的参与者进行了访谈,这些参与者是精神分裂症患者的直系血亲及三代以内旁系血亲。排除已诊断为精神分裂症的参与者的亲属。所有参与者均通过三种心理测量工具(CAARMS、SIPS和BSABS)评估UHR状态。心理测量诊断结果包括有精神病风险(UHR +)、无精神病风险(UHR -)和精神病。还测量了人口统计学和临床特征。评估评分者间一致性以评价这三种量表的一致性。还记录了UHR +受试者在2年内发展为精神病的转化率。

结果

CAARMS与SIPS、SIPS与BSABS、CAARMS与BSABS的总体一致率分别为93.12%、92.06%和93.65%。三组(UHR +、无精神病风险和精神病)相对功能损害的总体一致率分别为89.24%、86.36%和88.12%。CAARMS、SIPS和BSABS总分评分者间信度分别为0.90、0.89和0.85。这三种工具所有子量表的评分者间信度都非常好到极好。对于CAARMS、SIPS和BSABS,关于UHR标准一致性的kappa系数分别为0.87、0.84和0.82(<0.001)。UHR +在2年内发展为精神病的转化率分别为16.7%(CAARMS)、10.0%(SIPS)和17.7%(BSABS)。

结论

CAARMS、SIPS和BSABS在识别精神分裂症患者近亲中的UHR参与者方面具有良好的诊断一致性。

相似文献

10
[Prodromes of schizophrenia: consensus or confusion?].[精神分裂症的前驱症状:共识还是困惑?]
Encephale. 2013 May;39 Suppl 1:S1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.11.002. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

5
Screening tools for clinical high risk for psychosis.精神病临床高风险筛查工具。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;9(5):345-56. doi: 10.1111/eip.12193. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
7
Attenuated psychosis syndrome: ready for DSM-5.1?衰减型精神病综合征:为 DSM-5.1 做好准备了吗?
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:155-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153645. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
9
Genealogy of instruments for prodrome evaluation of psychosis.精神病前驱期评估仪器的发展历程。
Front Psychiatry. 2013 Apr 18;4:25. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00025. eCollection 2013.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验