Earlier functional recovery and discharge from hospital for THA patients operated on via direct superior compared to standard posterior approach: a retrospective frequency-matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND

The direct superior hip approach (DSA) has been less researched than other approaches in the literature. We retrospectively compared the early postoperative and functional outcomes of patients with hip osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via DSA with a matched control group using a standard posterior approach (SPA).

METHODS

The DSA group comprised 100 THAs performed via DSA by a senior surgeon between January 2018 and May 2019. Patients with primary osteoarthritis and ASA score ⩽3 who were eligible for surgery were included. The DSA group was compared to a matched cohort of 100 patients operated on with a SPA in the same period by another chief surgeon. Patients were matched for age, sex, and ASA score. All patients received the same postoperative chemoprophylaxis, pain management and physiotherapy. 2 independent attending arthroplasty surgeons assessed the incision length, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications. VAS, HHS, and HOOS scores were also evaluated for a year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean incision length and hospital stay were significantly lower in the DSA group. DSA patients had non-significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, transfusion needs, and postoperative pain than SPA patients. Mean operation time and complication rate did not differ between groups. The DSA group demonstrated significantly greater functional scores than the SPA group at the first postoperative month. No differences in scores were recorded following the third month.

CONCLUSIONS

The DSA approach may provide earlier functional recovery and hospital discharge for THA patients compared with SPA. DSA was equivalent to SPA concerning pain and blood loss, showing minimal complication rates.