Dental faculty, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Bernardo OHiggins, Santiago, Chile.
P R Health Sci J. 2022 Mar 17;41(1):22-28.
The objective of this study was to determine cut-off points that can be used to differentiate measures of empathy, which would then be classified as high, medium, or low. To do so, we used data from students from 7 medical schools in Colombia, El Salvador, and the Dominican Republic, after determining the psychometric properties of the 3-dimensional model of empathy in the Jefferson Scale of Empathy, S-version (for medical students).
This non-experimental descriptive study had a sample that consisted of 6291 students. The structure and factor invariance were analyzed by country and sex. A hierarchical cluster analysis and a bifactorial analysis of variance were applied.
The measure of empathy was reliable on the global scale (α = .82; ω = .88). A confirmatory factor analysis showed that the original model was replicable and adjusted to the data (comparative fit index [CFI] = .90; goodness of fit index = .94), while the multigroup analysis allowed to assume an invariant factor structure by country and gender (ΔCFI < .01). Tables were constructed with cut off points for empathy and its dimensions.
Our study solves the problem of comparing the scores and the levels of empathy observed in the medical students at different schools of medicine, making said comparisons within and between countries and between genders. The instrument used has adequate psychometric properties and the cut-off values obtained allow the classifying of people with lower or higher levels of empathy.
本研究旨在确定可用于区分同理心测量的临界点,然后将其分为高、中、低。为此,我们使用了来自哥伦比亚、萨尔瓦多和多米尼加共和国 7 所医学院的学生的数据,在确定了 Jefferson 同理心量表 S 版(医学生版)的 3 维同理心模型的心理测量特性后。
本非实验性描述性研究的样本由 6291 名学生组成。对国家和性别进行了结构和因子不变性分析。应用了层次聚类分析和双因素方差分析。
整体同理心测量具有可靠性(α=.82;ω=.88)。验证性因子分析表明,原始模型可复制并适用于数据(比较拟合指数 [CFI] =.90;拟合优度指数 =.94),而多组分析允许假设国家和性别之间的因子结构不变(ΔCFI <.01)。构建了同理心及其维度的临界点表格。
我们的研究解决了在不同医学院校的医学生中比较观察到的同理心得分和水平的问题,实现了国家和性别内和之间的比较。所使用的工具具有足够的心理测量特性,获得的临界点值允许对具有较低或较高同理心水平的人进行分类。