• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测量医学生同理心的多伦多同理心问卷韩文版的验证研究。

A validation study of the Korean version of the Toronto empathy questionnaire for the measurement of medical students' empathy.

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.

Department of Medical Education, Dongguk University School of Medicine, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10326, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02561-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-021-02561-7
PMID:33607995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7893770/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) and to determine its suitability for the measurement of empathy in medical students.

METHODS

The study sample was Year 1 and 2 medical students at two medical schools on six-year undergraduate medical programs in South Korea. The study participants completed the Korean TEQ, which has a single factor structure and consists of 16 items; responses are scored using a 5-point Likert scale, giving a maximum possible score of 64. Psychometric validation of the questionnaire was performed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and the goodness of fit test. Average variance extracted was calculated to establish convergent validity, and associations between factors and construct reliability were analyzed to establish discriminant validity. Cronbach's alpha values were utilized for reliability analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 279 students completed and returned the questionnaire (a 96.2% response rate). Participant empathy scores ranged from 20 to 60 (M = 44.6, SD = 7.36). Empathy scores were higher for females than males (p < .05). The cumulative variance of the Korean TEQ was 32%, indicating that its explanatory power was rather weak. Consequently, goodness-of-fit testing was performed on four hypothetical models, among which a three-factorial structure consisting of 14 items demonstrated satisfactory fit indices and explained 55% of the variance. Reliability estimates of the three subscales were also satisfactory (Cronbach's α = .71-.81). This three-factorial model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis and demonstrated adequate convergent and discriminant validity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated psychometric validation of the Korean TEQ for measuring medical students' empathy. We suggest a modified 14-item model with a three-factorial structure, which demonstrated better psychometric properties than the original scale.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在验证多伦多同理心问卷(TEQ)的韩文版本,并确定其在测量医学生同理心方面的适用性。

方法

研究样本为韩国两所六年制本科医学项目的一年级和二年级医学生。研究参与者完成了韩国 TEQ,该问卷具有单一因素结构,由 16 个项目组成;使用 5 点 Likert 量表评分,最高可得 64 分。通过探索性和验证性因子分析以及拟合优度检验对问卷进行心理测量学验证。平均方差提取用于建立收敛效度,分析因素之间和结构可靠性之间的关联以建立判别效度。采用 Cronbach's alpha 值进行可靠性分析。

结果

共有 279 名学生完成并返回问卷(应答率为 96.2%)。参与者的同理心得分范围为 20 至 60(M=44.6,SD=7.36)。女性的同理心得分高于男性(p<0.05)。韩国 TEQ 的累积方差为 32%,表明其解释力较弱。因此,对四个假设模型进行了拟合优度检验,其中由 14 个项目组成的三因素结构表现出令人满意的拟合指数,解释了 55%的方差。三个子量表的可靠性估计也令人满意(Cronbach's α=0.71-0.81)。通过验证性因子分析验证了三因素模型,证明具有足够的收敛和判别效度。

结论

本研究表明,韩国 TEQ 具有测量医学生同理心的心理测量学验证。我们建议使用具有三因素结构的改良 14 项模型,其心理测量学特性优于原始量表。

相似文献

1
A validation study of the Korean version of the Toronto empathy questionnaire for the measurement of medical students' empathy.用于测量医学生同理心的多伦多同理心问卷韩文版的验证研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02561-7.
2
Validation of the Romanian Version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) among Undergraduate Medical Students.验证多伦多同理心问卷(TEQ)罗马尼亚语版本在医科大学生中的适用性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;18(24):12871. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412871.
3
Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation.一种用于测量医学生对评估环境认知的工具的开发:初步验证
Med Educ Online. 2015 Oct 27;20:28612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28612. eCollection 2015.
4
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: making sense of the total score through a second order confirmatory factor analysis.《杰斐逊同理心量表》西班牙语版的心理测量特性:通过二阶验证性因素分析理解总分
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 19;16(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0763-5.
5
Measuring empathy in a group of South African undergraduate medical students using the student version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.使用杰斐逊共情量表学生版对一组南非本科医学生的共情能力进行测量。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2019 May 27;11(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1956.
6
Development and Validation of a Chinese Version of a School-to-Work Transition Anxiety Scale for Healthcare Students.开发和验证中文版医学生从学校到工作过渡焦虑量表。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 19;18(14):7658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147658.
7
Psychometric properties of a French version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.《杰斐逊同理心量表法》法译本的心理计量学特性。
Int J Med Educ. 2022 Jul 29;13:205-214. doi: 10.5116/ijme.62d2.8497.
8
Validation of a Modified Version of Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Medical Students Using Rasch Analysis.运用 Rasch 分析对医学生人际反应指数进行修正版本的验证。
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jun-Jul;35(3):346-355. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2042815. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
[The Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (K-WLEIS)].[韩文版王和劳氏情商量表(K-WLEIS)的信效度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020 Aug;50(4):611-620. doi: 10.4040/jkan.20109.
10
Validity and reliability of a Korean version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.《咨询和关系共情(CARE)量表韩文版的有效性和信度》。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 26;22(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03478-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental anxiety and empathy among undergraduate oral health students in Norway, South Africa and Namibia.挪威、南非和纳米比亚口腔健康专业本科学生的牙科焦虑与同理心。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2025 Apr 9;84:174-181. doi: 10.2340/aos.v84.43424.
2
Understanding empathy and theory of mind in Romanian dental students for improved educational strategies.了解罗马尼亚牙科学生的同理心和心理理论以改进教育策略。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 31;15(1):3880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88264-1.
3
The impact of empathy on medical students: an integrative review.同理心对医学生的影响:综合述评。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05448-5.
4
Empathy Levels in Medical Students: A Single Center Study.医学生的共情水平:一项单中心研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 3;15(5):e38487. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38487. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Physician empathy in Korean clinical contexts: developing a conceptual framework and exploring influencing factors.韩国临床情境下的医师同理心:概念框架的构建与影响因素的探讨。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Mar;35(1):9-20. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.245. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
6
Empathy levels in Australian chiropractic students.澳大利亚整脊学生的同理心水平。
J Chiropr Educ. 2022 Oct 1;36(2):110-116. doi: 10.7899/JCE-21-16.
7
Validation of the Romanian Version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) among Undergraduate Medical Students.验证多伦多同理心问卷(TEQ)罗马尼亚语版本在医科大学生中的适用性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;18(24):12871. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412871.
8
Distance education perception scale for medical students: a validity and reliability study.医学生远程教育认知量表:效度与信度研究
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jul 26;21(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02839-w.
9
Psychometric Analysis of the Czech Version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire.《多伦多同理心问卷捷克语版的心理计量分析》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 17;18(10):5343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105343.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) Among Medical Students in China: Analyses Using Three Psychometric Methods.多伦多共情问卷(TEQ)在中国医学生中的效度验证:采用三种心理测量方法的分析
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 28;11:810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00810. eCollection 2020.
2
Measuring Medical Students' Empathy: Exploring the Underlying Constructs of and Associations Between Two Widely Used Self-Report Instruments in Five Countries.测量医学生的同理心:探索五个国家中两种广泛使用的自我报告工具的潜在结构及两者之间的关联。
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):860-867. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001449.
3
What Matters More About the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the Jefferson Scale of Empathy? Their Underlying Constructs or Their Relationships With Pertinent Measures of Clinical Competence and Patient Outcomes?关于人际反应指数和杰斐逊共情量表,更重要的是什么?是它们的潜在结构,还是它们与临床能力和患者结局相关指标的关系?
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):743-745. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001424.
4
Empathy in medicine: Neuroscience, education and challenges.医学中的同理心:神经科学、教育与挑战
Med Teach. 2017 Feb;39(2):164-173. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1248925. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
Undergraduate medical students' empathy: current perspectives.本科医学生的同理心:当前观点。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Aug 2;7:443-55. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S76800. eCollection 2016.
6
Clarifying changes in student empathy throughout medical school: a scoping review.阐明医学院校学生同理心的变化:一项范围综述
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Dec;22(5):1293-1313. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9704-7. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
7
Underlying construct of empathy, optimism, and burnout in medical students.医学生共情、乐观与职业倦怠的潜在结构。
Int J Med Educ. 2015 Jan 29;6:12-6. doi: 10.5116/ijme.54c3.60cd.
8
Standardized patient assessment of medical student empathy: ethnicity and gender effects in a multi-institutional study.医学生同理心的标准化患者评估:多机构研究中的种族和性别影响。
Acad Med. 2015 Jan;90(1):105-11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000529.
9
An exploration of changes in cognitive and emotional empathy among medical students in the Caribbean.对加勒比地区医学生认知共情和情感共情变化的探索。
Int J Med Educ. 2014 Sep 24;5:185-92. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5412.e641.
10
Empathy in Korean medical students: Findings from a nationwide survey.韩国医学生的同理心:一项全国性调查的结果。
Med Teach. 2015;37(10):943-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.956058. Epub 2014 Sep 3.