BC Cancer Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Blood Adv. 2022 Sep 27;6(18):5285-5294. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007371.
The objective of this study was to explore differences in outcomes between first-line rituximab plus bendamustine (R-B) and R-CHOP/R-DHAP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin) in transplant-eligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). A population-based cohort of 97 patients aged 18 to 65 years with stage II-IV MCL, consecutively treated with R-B was retrospectively identified at BC Cancer. Baseline characteristics, response rates, and outcomes were compared with the cohort of 232 patients with MCL randomized to the R-CHOP/R-DHAP arm of the MCL Younger trial. The primary endpoint was the hazard ratio (HR) of the progression-free survival (PFS) comparison between both groups, adjusted for MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI), Ki67 index, and blastoid/ pleomorphic morphology. Ann Arbor stage, lactate dehydrogenase, MIPI, blastoid morphology, and MCL35 assignments were similar between both groups. The overall response rate (ORR) to R-B was 90% (54% complete response [CR]); 77% of patients proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 78% received maintenance rituximab (MR). The ORR to R-CHOP/R-DHAP was 94% (54% CR); 78% proceeded to ASCT and 2% received MR. There were no differences in PFS in unadjusted (HR, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.41; P = .56) or adjusted (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.45-1.37; P = .40) comparisons. There were no clear differences in secondary endpoints in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. This retrospective adjusted comparison of 2 independent cohorts of younger patients with MCL suggests that R-B with ASCT and maintenance rituximab is a feasible and effective first-line treatment, with outcomes comparable to R-CHOP/R-DHAP with ASCT.
这项研究的目的是探讨在适合移植的套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)患者中,一线利妥昔单抗联合苯达莫司汀(R-B)与 R-CHOP/R-DHAP(利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松、地塞米松、阿糖胞苷、顺铂)之间的结局差异。在不列颠哥伦比亚癌症中心,回顾性地确定了一个由 97 名年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间、患有 II-IV 期 MCL 的患者组成的人群,他们连续接受了 R-B 治疗。将这些患者的基线特征、缓解率和结局与 232 名接受 MCL 年轻患者试验 R-CHOP/R-DHAP 手臂随机分组的 MCL 患者队列进行比较。主要终点是两组之间无进展生存期(PFS)比较的风险比(HR),调整了 MCL 国际预后指数(MIPI)、Ki67 指数和母细胞样/多形性形态。两组之间的 Ann Arbor 分期、乳酸脱氢酶、MIPI、母细胞样形态和 MCL35 分配相似。R-B 的总缓解率(ORR)为 90%(54%完全缓解[CR]);77%的患者进行了自体干细胞移植(ASCT),78%的患者接受了维持性利妥昔单抗(MR)。R-CHOP/R-DHAP 的 ORR 为 94%(54%CR);78%的患者进行了 ASCT,2%的患者接受了 MR。在未调整(HR,0.87;95%置信区间[CI],0.53-1.41;P=0.56)或调整(HR,0.79;95%CI,0.45-1.37;P=0.40)比较中,PFS 均无差异。在未调整或调整分析中,次要终点均无明显差异。这项针对年轻 MCL 患者的 2 个独立队列的回顾性调整比较表明,R-B 联合 ASCT 和维持性利妥昔单抗是一种可行且有效的一线治疗方法,其结局与 R-CHOP/R-DHAP 联合 ASCT 相当。