Suppr超能文献

伊布替尼联合免疫化疗联合或不联合自体造血干细胞移植与免疫化疗和自体造血干细胞移植治疗未经治疗的套细胞淋巴瘤患者(TRIANGLE):欧洲套细胞淋巴瘤网络的一项三臂、随机、开放标签、III 期优效性试验。

Ibrutinib combined with immunochemotherapy with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation versus immunochemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in previously untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (TRIANGLE): a three-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network.

机构信息

Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.

Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet. 2024 May 25;403(10441):2293-2306. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00184-3. Epub 2024 May 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adding ibrutinib to standard immunochemotherapy might improve outcomes and challenge autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in younger (aged 65 years or younger) mantle cell lymphoma patients. This trial aimed to investigate whether the addition of ibrutinib results in a superior clinical outcome compared with the pre-trial immunochemotherapy standard with ASCT or an ibrutinib-containing treatment without ASCT. We also investigated whether standard treatment with ASCT is superior to a treatment adding ibrutinib but without ASCT.

METHODS

The open-label, randomised, three-arm, parallel-group, superiority TRIANGLE trial was performed in 165 secondary or tertiary clinical centres in 13 European countries and Israel. Patients with previously untreated, stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma, aged 18-65 years and suitable for ASCT were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to control group A or experimental groups A+I or I, stratified by study group and mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index risk groups. Treatment in group A consisted of six alternating cycles of R-CHOP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m on day 0 or 1, intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m on day 1, intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m on day 1, intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m on day 1, and oral prednisone 100 mg on days 1-5) and R-DHAP (or R-DHAOx, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m on day 0 or 1, intravenous or oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, intravenous cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m for 3 h every 12 h on day 2, and intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m over 24 h on day 1 or alternatively intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m on day 1) followed by ASCT. In group A+I, ibrutinib (560 mg orally each day) was added on days 1-19 of R-CHOP cycles and as fixed-duration maintenance (560 mg orally each day for 2 years) after ASCT. In group I, ibrutinib was given the same way as in group A+I, but ASCT was omitted. Three pairwise one-sided log-rank tests for the primary outcome of failure-free survival were statistically monitored. The primary analysis was done by intention-to-treat. Adverse events were evaluated by treatment period among patients who started the respective treatment. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858258.

FINDINGS

Between July 29, 2016 and Dec 28, 2020, 870 patients (662 men, 208 women) were randomly assigned to group A (n=288), group A+I (n=292), and group I (n=290). After 31 months median follow-up, group A+I was superior to group A with 3-year failure-free survival of 88% (95% CI 84-92) versus 72% (67-79; hazard ratio 0·52 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-0·86]; one-sided p=0·0008). Superiority of group A over group I was not shown with 3-year failure-free survival 72% (67-79) versus 86% (82-91; hazard ratio 1·77 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-3·76]; one-sided p=0·9979). The comparison of group A+I versus group I is ongoing. There were no relevant differences in grade 3-5 adverse events during induction or ASCT between patients treated with R-CHOP/R-DHAP or ibrutinib combined with R-CHOP/R-DHAP. During maintenance or follow-up, substantially more grade 3-5 haematological adverse events and infections were reported after ASCT plus ibrutinib (group A+I; haematological: 114 [50%] of 231 patients; infections: 58 [25%] of 231; fatal infections: two [1%] of 231) compared with ibrutinib only (group I; haematological: 74 [28%] of 269; infections: 52 [19%] of 269; fatal infections: two [1%] of 269) or after ASCT (group A; haematological: 51 [21%] of 238; infections: 32 [13%] of 238; fatal infections: three [1%] of 238).

INTERPRETATION

Adding ibrutinib to first-line treatment resulted in superior efficacy in younger mantle cell lymphoma patients with increased toxicity when given after ASCT. Adding ibrutinib during induction and as maintenance should be part of first-line treatment of younger mantle cell lymphoma patients. Whether ASCT adds to an ibrutinib-containing regimen is not yet determined.

FUNDING

Janssen and Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.

摘要

背景

在年轻(65 岁或以下)套细胞淋巴瘤患者中,将伊布替尼加入标准免疫化疗可能会改善预后并挑战自体干细胞移植(ASCT)。本试验旨在研究与预处理免疫化疗标准联合 ASCT 或不含 ASCT 的伊布替尼治疗相比,伊布替尼的加入是否会带来更好的临床结果。我们还研究了标准 ASCT 治疗是否优于添加伊布替尼但不进行 ASCT 的治疗。

方法

在 165 个二级或三级临床中心进行了开放标签、随机、三臂、平行组、优效性 TRIANGLE 试验,这些中心分布在 13 个欧洲国家和以色列。年龄在 18-65 岁之间,适合 ASCT 的未经治疗的 II-IV 期套细胞淋巴瘤患者,随机以 1:1:1 的比例分配至对照组 A 或实验组 A+I 或 I,按研究组和套细胞淋巴瘤国际预后指数风险组分层。组 A 的治疗方案包括 6 个周期的 R-CHOP(静脉注射利妥昔单抗 375mg/m2,第 0 天或第 1 天,静脉注射环磷酰胺 750mg/m2,第 1 天,静脉注射多柔比星 50mg/m2,第 1 天,静脉注射长春新碱 1.4mg/m2,第 1-5 天口服泼尼松 100mg)和 R-DHAP(或 R-DHAOx,静脉注射利妥昔单抗 375mg/m2,第 0 天或第 1 天,静脉或口服地塞米松 40mg,第 1-4 天,第 2 天每 12 小时静脉注射阿糖胞苷 2×2g/m,持续 3 小时,第 1 天或第 1 天静脉注射顺铂 100mg/m2,或第 1 天静脉注射奥沙利铂 130mg/m2),随后进行 ASCT。在组 A+I 中,在 R-CHOP 周期的第 1-19 天口服伊布替尼(每天 560mg),并在 ASCT 后进行为期 2 年的固定剂量维持治疗(每天口服伊布替尼 560mg)。在组 I 中,以与组 A+I 相同的方式给予伊布替尼,但省略了 ASCT。对无失败生存的主要结局进行了 3 次单侧对数秩检验,进行了统计学监测。主要分析按意向治疗进行。在开始各自治疗的患者中,根据治疗期评估不良事件。正在进行的试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT02858258。

结果

2016 年 7 月 29 日至 2020 年 12 月 28 日期间,共有 870 名患者(662 名男性,208 名女性)被随机分配至组 A(n=288)、组 A+I(n=292)和组 I(n=290)。中位随访 31 个月后,与组 A 相比,组 A+I 显示出 3 年无失败生存率的优势,分别为 88%(95%CI 84-92)和 72%(67-79;风险比 0.52[单侧 98.3%CI 0-0.86];单侧 p=0.0008)。组 A 优于组 I 的优势并未显示,3 年无失败生存率分别为 72%(67-79)和 86%(82-91;风险比 1.77[单侧 98.3%CI 0-3.76];单侧 p=0.9979)。组 A+I 与组 I 的比较仍在进行中。在接受 R-CHOP/R-DHAP 或伊布替尼联合 R-CHOP/R-DHAP 治疗的患者中,诱导或 ASCT 期间以及 ASCT 后,3-5 级不良事件的发生率无明显差异。在维持或随访期间,ASCT 加伊布替尼(组 A+I;3-5 级血液学不良事件:114[50%]例 231 例;感染:58[25%]例 231 例;致命感染:2[1%]例 231 例)与仅用伊布替尼(组 I;3-5 级血液学不良事件:74[28%]例 269 例;感染:52[19%]例 269 例;致命感染:2[1%]例 269 例)或仅接受 ASCT(组 A;3-5 级血液学不良事件:51[21%]例 238 例;感染:32[13%]例 238 例;致命感染:3[1%]例 238 例)相比,报告的 3-5 级血液学和感染不良事件明显更多。

解释

在年轻的套细胞淋巴瘤患者中,将伊布替尼加入一线治疗可提高疗效,但在 ASCT 后会增加毒性。在诱导和维持期间加入伊布替尼应成为年轻套细胞淋巴瘤患者一线治疗的一部分。ASCT 是否增加伊布替尼治疗方案的疗效仍不确定。

资金来源

杨森和白血病与淋巴瘤协会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验