Department of Operative Dentistry, University of São Paulo, School of Dentistry, São Paulo-SP/Brazil, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes, 2227, São Paulo, SP - 05508-000, Brazil.
Optical Coherence Tomography Laboratory, University of São Paulo, Institute for Energy and Nuclear Research (IPEN/CNEN), São Paulo-SP/Brazil, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2242, São Paulo/SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 Jul;131:105232. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105232. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
To evaluate biocorrosion and eccentric occlusal loading interplay in marginal quality of cervical restorations.
Cervical wedge-shaped cavities were prepared in extracted premolars and restored with a composite. Premolars underwent either an erosive challenge (E: 1% citric acid/10 min), eccentric occlusal loading (EOL: 150 N/2.5 Hz/10 cycles), E before EOL (E + EOL), E intermediate to EOL (EOL/E/EOL), E after EOL (EOL + E), or no E or EOL (C: control). Marginal quality was analyzed based on a series of Optical Coherence Tomography images. Each of the margins was assigned a gap score (0, 1, 2, or 3) and measurement (μm). For each margin, scores data were analyzed with Kruskall Wallis and Dunn tests, and μm data, with Kruskall Wallis. Overall and for each group, the different margins were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the correlation between scores and μm, Spearman's correlation coefficient (α = 0.05).
E and EOL, even if associated, did not influence enamel marginal quality. EOL/E/EOL impaired dentin/cementum marginal quality only in the case of scores and compared to E. E + EOL, EOL + E or EOL and even C, without differences between each other, did not influence results differently from E or EOL/E/EOL. Margins in dentin/cementum always showed lengthier gaps. Except for C, E and EOL + E cervical margin, there was a strong positive correlation between scores and μm.
Eccentric occlusal loading and/or biocorrosion cannot be assumed as causes of marginal failure of cervical restorations in wedge-shaped cavities. A relevant concern may still be the establishment of adhesive interfaces in dentin/cementum.
Although non-carious cervical lesions are strongly being recognized multifactorial and their respective restorations not always behave as expected, biocorrosion and eccentric occlusal loading interplay cannot serve as an explanation for marginal gaps they often present.
评估生物腐蚀性和边缘质量不良的偏侧咬合负载在颈修复体中的相互作用。
在离体前磨牙上制备楔形颈壁缺损并用复合树脂修复。前磨牙接受以下处理之一:侵蚀挑战(E:1%柠檬酸/10 分钟)、偏侧咬合负载(EOL:150N/2.5Hz/10 次循环)、E 前 EOL(E+EOL)、E 中至 EOL(EOL/E/EOL)、E 后 EOL(EOL+E)或无 E 或 EOL(C:对照)。根据一系列光相干断层扫描图像分析边缘质量。每个边缘都分配一个间隙评分(0、1、2 或 3)和测量值(μm)。对于每个边缘,评分数据采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Dunn 检验进行分析,μm 数据采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行分析。对于总体和每个组,使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较不同的边缘,使用 Spearman 相关系数(α=0.05)比较评分和μm 之间的相关性。
E 和 EOL 即使相关,也不会影响牙釉质边缘质量。EOL/E/EOL 仅在评分方面损害牙本质/牙骨质边缘质量,与 E 相比。E+EOL、EOL+E 或 EOL 甚至 C 之间没有差异,彼此之间的影响与 E 或 EOL/E/EOL 不同。牙本质/牙骨质的边缘总是显示更长的间隙。除了 C、E 和 EOL+E 颈缘外,评分和μm 之间存在很强的正相关。
不能将偏侧咬合负载和/或生物腐蚀性视为楔形腔颈修复体边缘失败的原因。一个相关的关注点可能仍然是牙本质/牙骨质中粘结界面的建立。
尽管非龋性颈病变被强烈认为是多因素的,它们各自的修复体并不总是表现出预期的效果,但生物腐蚀性和偏侧咬合负载的相互作用不能解释它们经常出现的边缘间隙。