School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022;42(6):615-634. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2022.2064203. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the available literature and identify gaps regarding the acceptability of telerehabilitation interventions provided by pediatric physical therapists and occupational therapists.
We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR) framework to guide this scoping review. We systematically searched eight scholarly databases (CINAHL, Medline, SPORTDiscus, AMED, APA PsychInfo, SCOPUS, PEDro, OTseeker), five gray literature databases (MedlinePlus, Gray Literature Report, OpenGrey, National Institute for Health, ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global [PQDT]), conducted a manual search of selected references and contacted international experts. We included articles published between 2000 and 2021. Acceptability was defined in accordance with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability of Sekhon et al.
From a total of 1567 unique references, 123 were deemed eligible for full-text review. Eighteen studies published between 2011 and 2021 were included in this review. Even though every aspect of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was assessed from a variety of angles, a complete appreciation of the concept is still lacking for pediatric telerehabilitation.
This review highlights important gaps in our knowledge regarding the acceptability of pediatric telerehabilitation interventions and supports the need for further research focusing on the subject.
本次范围综述的目的是探索现有的文献，并确定儿科物理治疗师和职业治疗师提供的远程康复干预措施的可接受性方面的差距。
我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA-ScR）框架来指导本次范围综述。我们系统地搜索了八个学术数据库（CINAHL、Medline、SPORTDiscus、AMED、APA PsychInfo、SCOPUS、PEDro、OTseeker）、五个灰色文献数据库（MedlinePlus、灰色文献报告、OpenGrey、国家卫生研究院、ProQuest 论文与论文全球 [PQDT]）、对选定的参考文献进行了手动搜索，并联系了国际专家。我们纳入了 2000 年至 2021 年期间发表的文章。可接受性是根据 Sekhon 等人的可接受性理论框架定义的。
从总共 1567 条独特的参考文献中，有 123 条被认为符合全文审查标准。本综述纳入了 18 项发表于 2011 年至 2021 年期间的研究。尽管从各种角度评估了可接受性理论框架的各个方面，但对于儿科远程康复，仍缺乏对该概念的完整理解。
本次综述突出了我们在儿科远程康复干预措施的可接受性方面知识的重要差距，并支持需要进一步研究该主题。
