Mori S
Prog Neurobiol. 1987;28(2):161-95. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(87)90010-4.
For the past 10 years, our group has been engaged in the study of posture and locomotion in decerebrate cats and in freely moving awake cats. Our initial objective was to analyse the neuronal mechanisms of locomotion from a viewpoint of "postural control". Therefore, in this review, I have focussed my attention on two major control aspects of the brain stem; one related to the interaction of posture and locomotion; and the other to initiation of locomotion. It is apparent that elucidation of the second aspect is feasible. In Fig. 15, I have summarized all the neuronal structures that have been functionally identified as being actively involved in the regulation of posture and locomotion. Obviously, contribution of the cerebello-cerebral pathways and the basal ganglia to both the postural and to the locomotor control cannot be elucidated in decerebrate preparations (Fig. 15A). These contributions can, to a certain degree, be elucidated in intact awake cats (Fig. 15B). Although it is difficult to directly compare the results obtained in the decerebrate cats with those obtained in intact cats, it has been encouraging that the selective activation of certain neuronal structures within the brain stem allowed us to evoke comparable postural and locomotor changes in both groups of preparations. It can be expected that the knowledge obtained from studies of the cerebello-cerebral pathways and of the basal ganglia, together with those that can be further obtained from studies of the brain stem, should result in the elucidation of the two major control aspects of the brain stem described above. In this sense, both the models of the decerebrate locomotor preparation and the freely moving, awake cat seem to provide an unique opportunity to study the nature and the sources of command signals that set the postural and the locomotor synergies into a single functional synergy, and even to approach elucidation of the intriguing question as to how and where volitional control signals for initiating and/or halting locomotion are organized. More than 70 years have passed since the pioneer studies by Sherrington (1906) and by Graham Brown (1911, 1914) on postural control and on locomotion, as exemplified by "decerebrate reflex standing, and stepping" and the "central rhythmic generator" relating to locomotion. Based on these discoveries, Shik, Severin and Orlovsky (1966) have made a splendid breakthrough in a wide area of investigation relating to locomotion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在过去的10年里,我们团队一直致力于研究去大脑猫和自由活动的清醒猫的姿势与运动。我们最初的目标是从“姿势控制”的角度分析运动的神经元机制。因此,在这篇综述中,我将重点关注脑干的两个主要控制方面;一个与姿势和运动的相互作用有关;另一个与运动的启动有关。显然,阐明第二个方面是可行的。在图15中,我总结了所有在功能上已被确定积极参与姿势和运动调节的神经元结构。显然,在去大脑标本中无法阐明小脑 - 大脑通路和基底神经节对姿势和运动控制的贡献(图15A)。在完整的清醒猫中,这些贡献在一定程度上是可以阐明的(图15B)。虽然很难直接比较去大脑猫和完整猫所获得的结果,但令人鼓舞的是,脑干内某些神经元结构的选择性激活使我们能够在两组标本中诱发可比的姿势和运动变化。可以预期,从小脑 - 大脑通路和基底神经节的研究中获得的知识,以及从脑干研究中可以进一步获得的知识,应该能够阐明上述脑干的两个主要控制方面。从这个意义上说,去大脑运动标本模型和自由活动的清醒猫似乎都提供了一个独特的机会,来研究将姿势和运动协同作用整合为单一功能协同作用的指令信号的性质和来源,甚至接近阐明关于如何以及在何处组织启动和/或停止运动的意志控制信号这个有趣的问题。自谢灵顿(1906年)和格雷厄姆·布朗(1911年、1914年)关于姿势控制和运动的开创性研究以来,已经过去了70多年,例如“去大脑反射站立和行走”以及与运动相关的“中枢节律发生器”。基于这些发现,希克、谢韦林和奥尔洛夫斯基(1966年)在与运动相关的广泛研究领域取得了辉煌的突破。(摘要截取自400字)