《性别检测工具的性能：姓名到性别的推理服务的比较研究》（2021年；109(3):414 - 21）及《使用genderize.io推断名字的性别：如何提高推断的准确性》（2021年；109(4):609 - 12）的勘误
Erratum to "Performance of gender detection tools: a comparative study of name-to-gender inference services," 2021;109(3):414-21 and "Using genderize.io to infer the gender of first names: how to improve the accuracy of the inference," 2021;109(4):609-12.
作者信息
Sebo Paul
出版信息
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):E32. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1528.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1185.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1252.].
摘要
[本文更正文章DOI：10.5195/jmla.2021.1185。][本文更正文章DOI：10.5195/jmla.2021.1252。]
相似文献
1
Erratum to "Performance of gender detection tools: a comparative study of name-to-gender inference services," 2021;109(3):414-21 and "Using genderize.io to infer the gender of first names: how to improve the accuracy of the inference," 2021;109(4):609-12.《性别检测工具的性能：姓名到性别的推理服务的比较研究》（2021年；109(3):414 - 21）及《使用genderize.io推断名字的性别：如何提高推断的准确性》（2021年；109(4):609 - 12）的勘误
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):E32. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1528.
2
Using genderize.io to infer the gender of first names: how to improve the accuracy of the inference.使用 genderize.io 推断名字的性别：如何提高推断的准确性。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):609-612. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1252.
3
Performance of gender detection tools: a comparative study of name-to-gender inference services.性别检测工具的性能：姓名到性别推断服务的比较研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):414-421. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1185.
4
Erratum to "How accurate are gender detection tools in predicting the gender for Chinese names? A study with 20,000 given names in Pinyin format," 2022;110(2):205-11.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):E33. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1544.
5
Erratum to: Pionke JJ, Phillips K, Migdalski A, Smith EM. Advocacy is all of us: recommendations to enhance the Medical Library Association's advocacy initiatives. J Med Libr Assoc. 2022;110(1):5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1327.勘误：皮翁克JJ、菲利普斯K、米格达尔斯基A、史密斯EM。倡导是我们所有人的事：加强医学图书馆协会倡导倡议的建议。《医学图书馆协会杂志》。2022年；110(1):5 - 14。DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1327
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):E30. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1489.
6
Erratum to: Bloss JE, LePrevost CE, Cofie LE, Lee JGL. Creating information resources and trainings for farmworker-serving community health workers. J Med Libr Assoc. 2022;110(1):113-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1272.《Bloss JE、LePrevost CE、Cofie LE、Lee JGL. 为服务农场工人的社区卫生工作者创建信息资源和培训》的勘误说明。《医学图书馆协会杂志》。2022年；110(1):113 - 118。DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1272 。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):E31. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1497.
7
Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services.姓名到性别的推理服务的比较与基准测试
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2018 Jul 16;4:e156. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.156. eCollection 2018.
8
How accurate are gender detection tools in predicting the gender for Chinese names? A study with 20,000 given names in Pinyin format.性别检测工具在预测中文名字的性别方面有多准确？一项针对 20000 个拼音形式的名字的研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):205-211. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1289.
9
Errata for Issue 110 (3).第110卷第3期勘误表。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Oct 1;110(4):E34. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1671.
10
Erratum: Medicine, Volume 95, Issue 24: Erratum.勘误：《医学》，第95卷，第24期：勘误。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug 7;95(31):e5074. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000490009.39850.74. eCollection 2016 Aug.
Zotero 插件