• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迪拜的机器人手术实施:关注结果。

Implementation of robotic surgery in Dubai: a focus on outcomes.

机构信息

The Department of Surgery, American Hospital in Dubai, Oud Metha, Dubai, UAE.

Royal College of Surgeons Ireland - Bahrain, Muharraq, Bahrain.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01407-8. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-022-01407-8
PMID:35441253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9939485/
Abstract

The rapid acceptance of robotic surgery in gallbladder, inguinal, and ventral hernia surgery has led to the growth of robotic surgery programs around the world. As this is new technology, implementation of such programs needs to be done safely, with a focus on patient outcomes. We herein describe the implementation of a new robotic surgery program in a major hospital in the Middle East. A laparoendoscopic surgeon led the program after training and proctoring. Competency based credentialing were created and put in place. To confirm safety of the program, all laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy and hernia operations were followed, and perioperative data analyzed. Out of the 304 patients included in this study, 157 were performed using the robotic approach. In the cholecystectomy group (n = 103) the single site approach offered shorter operative times (P < 0.05). Both the single site robotic and the robotic assisted approaches resulted in less pain (P < 0.05). In the inguinal hernia group (n = 146) the laparoscopic approach offered shorter operative times (P < 0.05), but the robotic approach was associated with less pain (P < 0.05). In the ventral hernia group (n = 55), the open approach offered the best operative times, but the robotic approach was associated with the least amount of pain (P < 0.05). This is the first report of the implementation of a robotic program in the MENA region where the primary measure of success is outcomes. We show that monitoring cholecystectomy, inguinal or ventral hernia data can confirm the quality of the program before expansion and moving forward to more complex procedures.

摘要

机器人手术在胆囊、腹股沟和腹疝手术中的迅速接受,导致了全球机器人手术项目的增长。由于这是一项新技术,因此需要安全地实施这些项目,重点关注患者的结果。在此,我们描述了在中东一家大医院中实施新的机器人手术项目的情况。在培训和指导后,由腹腔镜外科医生领导该项目。创建并实施了基于能力的认证。为了确认该计划的安全性,我们对所有腹腔镜和机器人胆囊切除术和疝手术进行了随访,并分析了围手术期数据。在这项研究的 304 名患者中,有 157 名患者采用机器人方法进行治疗。在胆囊切除术组(n=103)中,单部位入路可缩短手术时间(P<0.05)。单部位机器人和机器人辅助方法都可减轻疼痛(P<0.05)。在腹股沟疝组(n=146)中,腹腔镜方法可缩短手术时间(P<0.05),但机器人方法与疼痛减轻有关(P<0.05)。在腹疝组(n=55)中,开放方法提供了最佳的手术时间,但机器人方法与疼痛程度最低有关(P<0.05)。这是在中东和北非地区实施机器人计划的第一份报告,该计划的主要成功指标是结果。我们表明,监测胆囊切除术、腹股沟或腹疝数据可以在扩展和推进到更复杂的手术之前确认该计划的质量。

相似文献

1
Implementation of robotic surgery in Dubai: a focus on outcomes.迪拜的机器人手术实施:关注结果。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01407-8. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery.机器人技术在微创外科时代的急诊普通外科手术中的应用。
JAMA Surg. 2024 May 1;159(5):493-499. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016.
3
Prospective, multicenter, pairwise analysis of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair with open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: early results from the Prospective Hernia Study.前瞻性、多中心、机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术与开放和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的配对分析:前瞻性疝研究的早期结果。
Hernia. 2020 Oct;24(5):1069-1081. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02224-4. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Robot-Assisted General Surgery Procedures at the Veterans Health Administration: A Comparison of Surgical Techniques.退伍军人事务部的机器人辅助普通外科手术:手术技术比较。
J Surg Res. 2022 Nov;279:330-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.032. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
6
Initial experience of a single surgeon for safety and feasibility of the Versius Robotic System in robot-assisted cholecystectomy and hernia repair.一名外科医生使用 Versius 机器人系统行机器人辅助胆囊切除术和疝修补术的初步经验:安全性和可行性。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 5;18(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01936-4.
7
Implementation of robotic hernia surgery using the Versius® system.使用 Versius® 系统实施机器人疝手术。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):565-569. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01451-4. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
8
Robotic inguinal hernia repair: Is it a new era in the management of inguinal hernia?机器人腹股沟疝修补术:是否开启了腹股沟疝治疗的新纪元?
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.03.015. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
9
Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic hernia repair: real-world evidence from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC).机器人辅助和腹腔镜疝修补术:来自美洲疝学会质量合作组织(AHSQC)的真实世界证据。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1331-1341. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07511-w. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
10
Economic assessment of starting robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a single-centre retrospective comparative study: the EASTER study.在单中心回顾性对照研究中开展机器人辅助腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的经济评估:EASTER 研究。
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa046.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Experience with Robotic Pancreatic Resections: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 20 Consecutive Cases.机器人胰腺切除术的早期经验:对连续20例病例的回顾性队列研究
Maedica (Bucur). 2025 Jun;20(2):151-159. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.151.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic inguinal hernia repair: Is it a new era in the management of inguinal hernia?机器人腹股沟疝修补术:是否开启了腹股沟疝治疗的新纪元?
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.03.015. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
2
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.
3
Clinical outcomes of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔机器人胆囊切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床效果比较。
Can J Surg. 2019 Feb 1;62(1):52-56. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000118.
4
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜单侧腹股沟疝修补术:全面的成本分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3436-3443. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
5
Incisional hernia after robotic single-site cholecystectomy: a pilot study.机器人单孔胆囊切除术后切口疝:一项初步研究。
Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):697-703. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1621-z. Epub 2017 May 9.
6
A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Single-Site Robotic and Multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.单孔机器人与多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术疗效的比较研究:来自三级医疗中心的经验
World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1246-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3799-0.
7
Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.达芬奇单孔胆囊切除术与多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的美容效果、患者满意度及生活质量:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验的短期结果
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3242-3250. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5353-4. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
8
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes.机器人辅助腹疝修补术:临床结局的多中心评估
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1342-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5118-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
9
Comparison study of clinical outcomes between single-site robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单部位机器人胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床疗效的对比研究。
Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):424-428. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 May 14.
10
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.