Gonzalez Anthony, Escobar Ernesto, Romero Rey, Walker Gail, Mejias Jacqueline, Gallas Michelle, Dickens Eugene, Johnson Christopher J, Rabaza Jorge, Kudsi Omar Yusef
Department of General and Bariatric Surgery, Baptist Health South Florida, 7800 SW 87th Ave. Suite B210, Miami, FL, 33173, USA.
Population Health and Outcomes Research, Center for Research and Grants, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1342-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5118-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
The open approach continues to be widely performed for ventral hernia repair, while the minimally invasive laparoscopic approach has grown adoption over the last decade. Recently, robotic operation was described as a new modality due to the ease for performing intracorporeal closure of the hernia defect. This study is one of the first multi-institutional case series evaluating robotic-assisted laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs, with the goal of describing robotic-assisted surgical techniques for ventral and incisional hernia repair and the outcomes in teaching and community hospital settings.
Medical records of consecutive patients (including surgeon's learning curve cases) who underwent ventral or incisional hernia repair utilizing the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale CA) were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included preoperative history and perioperative outcomes.
Data for a total of 368 patients from four institutions involving five surgeons were analyzed. They were predominantly females (60.3 %), and the mean age was 51 years. The majority of the patients were obese or morbidly obese (47.8 and 20.9 %), and 83.2 % of the patients had a history of prior abdominal operation. Conversion rate was 0.8 %, and mean length of stay was 1 day. Total postoperative complications rate up to 30 days was 8.4 %, of which incidence of paralytic ileus was 2.4 %.
This large case series of 368 patients demonstrates reproducibility of safety and performance associated with robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs performed by five surgeons at four institutions. In addition, the results of short term perioperative outcomes for surgeons during their early experience for robotic-assisted cases are in the range of what is reported in the existing published data on laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Further comparative evidence initiatives are being pursued to determine the benefits of robotic-assisted technique and technology for long-term and patient-reported outcomes.
开放手术仍然广泛应用于腹疝修补,而微创腹腔镜手术在过去十年中得到了更多的采用。最近,机器人手术因其便于进行疝缺损的体内闭合而被视为一种新的手术方式。本研究是首批多机构病例系列研究之一,旨在评估机器人辅助腹腔镜腹疝修补术,目的是描述用于腹疝和切口疝修补的机器人辅助手术技术以及在教学医院和社区医院环境中的手术结果。
对连续接受使用达芬奇手术系统(直观外科公司,加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔)进行腹疝或切口疝修补的患者(包括外科医生学习曲线病例)的病历进行回顾性分析。收集的数据包括术前病史和围手术期结果。
分析了来自四个机构的五名外科医生的总共368例患者的数据。患者以女性为主(60.3%),平均年龄为51岁。大多数患者为肥胖或病态肥胖(分别为47.8%和20.9%),83.2%的患者有腹部手术史。中转率为(0.8%),平均住院时间为1天。术后30天内的总并发症发生率为(8.4%),其中麻痹性肠梗阻的发生率为(2.4%)。
这个368例患者的大型病例系列证明了由四个机构的五名外科医生进行的机器人辅助腹疝修补术在安全性和手术效果方面具有可重复性。此外,外科医生在机器人辅助手术早期经验中的短期围手术期结果与现有已发表的腹腔镜和开放腹疝修补术数据报告的范围相符。正在开展进一步的比较性证据研究,以确定机器人辅助技术对长期和患者报告结果的益处。