Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart Center, Benekestr. 2-8, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff Heart Center, Benekestr. 2-8, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Dec 2;8(8):815-824. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac027.
The objective of the study was to determine the effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) on the survival of subgroups of patients with aortic stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to assess the impact of types and dosages of RASI on outcomes.
This single-centre, retrospective analysis included 2862 patients (n = 2227 with RASI and n = 635 without RASI) after successful TAVI. Propensity score matching established comparable patient populations (n = 625 per group). Survival was analysed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression and was corrected for baseline, procedural, and medical parameters. Self-reported adherence to RASI therapy 3 months after hospital discharge was 94%. Three-year all-cause mortality rates were 12.3% and 20.2% for patients with or without RASI, respectively (log-rank <0.001). In the matched study populations, mortality rates were 14.2% vs. 20.0% (log-rank <0.03). RASI was particularly beneficial in patients with ejection fraction <40% [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval 0.50 (0.29-0.87)], EuroScore II ≥4% [HR 0.47 (0.35-0.65)], or low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis [HR 0.53 (0.31-0.93)] who were also on beta-blockers and statins. An association between discharge dosage and survival was observed, with HR 0.75 (0.58-0.96) and 0.57 (0.44-0.72) for patients on <50% and ≥50% target dose, respectively. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) reduced mortality rates similarly (13.9% vs. 9.8%, log-rank 0.103).
The beneficial association between RASI after TAVI and improved survival during follow-up is particularly evident in high-risk patients and may be dose dependent. No superiority was noted in the effectiveness of ACEI or ARB.
本研究旨在探讨肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASI)对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后主动脉瓣狭窄患者亚组生存的影响,并评估 RASI 类型和剂量对结局的影响。
本单中心回顾性分析纳入了 2862 例成功接受 TAVI 治疗的患者(n=2227 例使用 RASI,n=635 例未使用 RASI)。通过倾向评分匹配建立可比的患者人群(每组 n=625 例)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 回归分析生存情况,并校正基线、手术和医疗参数。出院后 3 个月时,RASI 治疗的自我报告依从率为 94%。有或无 RASI 的患者 3 年全因死亡率分别为 12.3%和 20.2%(log-rank<0.001)。在匹配的研究人群中,死亡率分别为 14.2%和 20.0%(log-rank<0.03)。RASI 对射血分数<40%[校正危险比(HR)和 95%置信区间为 0.50(0.29-0.87)]、EuroScore II≥4%[HR 0.47(0.35-0.65)]或低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄[HR 0.53(0.31-0.93)]且使用β受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物的患者特别有益。出院时剂量与生存之间存在关联,接受<50%和≥50%目标剂量的患者 HR 分别为 0.75(0.58-0.96)和 0.57(0.44-0.72)。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)降低死亡率的效果相似(13.9%vs.9.8%,log-rank 0.103)。
TAVI 后 RASI 与随访期间生存改善之间的有益关联在高危患者中尤为明显,且可能与剂量有关。ACEI 和 ARB 的有效性无显著差异。