Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California; Queen Sirikit Heart Center of the Northeast, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Cardiology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 15;141:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
Limited data exist on optimal medical therapy post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for late cardiovascular events prevention. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of beta-blocker (BB), renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi), and their combination on outcomes following successful TAVI. In a consecutive cohort of 1,684 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI, the status of BB and RASi treatment at discharge was collected, and patients were classified into 4 groups: no-treatment, BB alone, RASi alone, and combination groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure (HHF) at 2-year. There were 415 (25%), 462 (27%), 349 (21%), and 458 (27%) patients in no-treatment, BB alone, RASi alone, and combination groups, respectively. The primary outcome was lower in RASi alone (21%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 0.81) and combination (22%; HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.72) groups than in no-treatment group (34%) but no significant difference between RASi alone and combination groups (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.62). The primary outcome results were maintained in a sensitivity analysis of patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function. Furthermore, RASi treatment was an independent predictor of 2-year all-cause mortality (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.90), while that was not observed in BB therapy (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.25). In conclusion, post-TAVI treatment with RASi, but not with BB, was associated with lower all-cause mortality and HHF at 2-year. The combination of RASi and BB did not add an incremental reduction in the primary outcome over RASi alone.
对于经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后预防晚期心血管事件,目前仅有有限的数据支持最佳的药物治疗方案。我们旨在评估β受体阻滞剂(BB)、肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)及其联合治疗对成功行 TAVI 后患者结局的影响。在一项连续纳入的 1684 例重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者队列中,收集了出院时 BB 和 RASi 治疗的情况,并将患者分为 4 组:无治疗、BB 单药、RASi 单药和联合治疗组。主要结局是全因死亡率和心力衰竭(HF)再住院的复合终点,随访时间为 2 年。无治疗、BB 单药、RASi 单药和联合治疗组患者分别为 415 例(25%)、462 例(27%)、349 例(21%)和 458 例(27%)。RASi 单药(21%;调整后 HR:0.58;95%CI:0.42 至 0.81)和联合治疗组(22%;HR:0.53;95%CI:0.39 至 0.72)的主要结局发生率低于无治疗组(34%),但 RASi 单药和联合治疗组之间无显著差异(HR:1.14;95%CI:0.80 至 1.62)。在左心室收缩功能降低的患者中进行敏感性分析后,主要结局结果仍然成立。此外,RASi 治疗是 2 年全因死亡率的独立预测因子(HR:0.68;95%CI:0.51 至 0.90),而 BB 治疗则不然(HR:0.94;95%CI:0.71 至 1.25)。总之,TAVI 后 RASi 治疗,而非 BB 治疗,与 2 年时的全因死亡率和 HF 再住院率降低相关。与 RASi 单药治疗相比,RASi 和 BB 联合治疗并不能进一步降低主要结局事件发生率。