• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using the Multidimensional Model of Acceptance to Investigate How Different Facets of Acceptance are Related to Quality of Life Following Spinal Cord Injury.采用多维接受模型调查在脊髓损伤后,不同接受维度与生活质量的关系。
J Rehabil Med. 2022 May 11;54:jrm00285. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.1055.
2
Structure and conceptualization of acceptance: a split-sample exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis approach to investigate the multidimensionality of acceptance of spinal cord injury.接受的结构和概念化:一种分割样本的探索性和验证性因子分析方法,用于研究脊髓损伤接受的多维性。
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Oct 7;53(10 (October)):jrm00232. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2876.
3
The associations of acceptance with quality of life and mental health following spinal cord injury: a systematic review.接受度与脊髓损伤后生活质量和心理健康的关联:系统评价。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Feb;58(2):130-148. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0379-9. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Internal consistency and convergent validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set at discharge from first rehabilitation.首次康复出院时国际脊髓损伤生活质量基本数据集的内部一致性和收敛效度。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Mar;60(3):261-267. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00696-4. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
5
Psychological impact and sexual dysfunction in men with and without spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤男性与非脊髓损伤男性的心理影响及性功能障碍
J Sex Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):436-44. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12741. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
6
The Effect of Health Service Use, Unmet Need, and Service Obstacles on Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being in the First Year After Discharge From Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.脊髓损伤康复出院后第一年的卫生服务利用、未满足需求和服务障碍对生活质量和心理幸福感的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;101(7):1162-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
[Quality of life of adults with spinal cord injury: a study using the WHOQOL-bref].[脊髓损伤成年人的生活质量:一项使用世界卫生组织生活质量简表的研究]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011 Dec;45(6):1364-71. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342011000600013.
8
Quality of life and its predictors in people with traumatic spinal cord injury in mainland China.中国大陆创伤性脊髓损伤患者的生活质量及其预测因素。
Spinal Cord. 2019 Sep;57(9):739-746. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0279-z. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
Differences in quality of life outcomes among depressed spinal cord injury trial participants.脊髓损伤抑郁试验参与者生活质量结果的差异。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Feb;96(2):340-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.036. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
10
Determining priorities in functional rehabilitation related to quality of life one-year following a traumatic spinal cord injury.确定创伤性脊髓损伤后一年与生活质量相关的功能康复重点。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Mar;43(2):241-246. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1517138. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators to alleviate loneliness and social isolation as identified by individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders: A qualitative study.脊髓损伤和疾病患者识别的缓解孤独和社会隔离的促进因素:一项定性研究。
Rehabil Psychol. 2024 Aug;69(3):264-274. doi: 10.1037/rep0000540. Epub 2024 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Structure and conceptualization of acceptance: a split-sample exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis approach to investigate the multidimensionality of acceptance of spinal cord injury.接受的结构和概念化:一种分割样本的探索性和验证性因子分析方法,用于研究脊髓损伤接受的多维性。
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Oct 7;53(10 (October)):jrm00232. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2876.
2
Perceived environmental barriers for people with spinal cord injury in Germany and their influence on quality of life.德国脊髓损伤患者感知到的环境障碍及其对生活质量的影响。
J Rehabil Med. 2020 Aug 24;52(8):jrm00090. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2717.
3
The associations of acceptance with quality of life and mental health following spinal cord injury: a systematic review.接受度与脊髓损伤后生活质量和心理健康的关联:系统评价。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Feb;58(2):130-148. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0379-9. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Relational Frame Theory, and the Third Wave of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies - Republished Article.接纳与承诺疗法、关系框架理论以及行为与认知疗法的第三次浪潮——再版文章
Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):869-885. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
Psychometric analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire in Danish patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (The DEFIB-WOMEN study).丹麦植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的患者健康问卷的心理测量分析(DEFIB-WOMEN研究)
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Nov;90:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
6
The foundational principles as psychological lodestars: Theoretical inspiration and empirical direction in rehabilitation psychology.作为心理导向之星的基本原则:康复心理学中的理论灵感与实证方向
Rehabil Psychol. 2016 Feb;61(1):1-6. doi: 10.1037/rep0000082.
7
Good validity of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set.国际脊髓损伤生活质量基本数据集具有良好的效度。
Spinal Cord. 2016 Apr;54(4):314-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.99. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
8
Psychological factors and mental health in persons with spinal cord injury: An exploration of change or stability.脊髓损伤患者的心理因素与心理健康:变化或稳定性的探索
J Rehabil Med. 2015 Jun;47(6):531-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1953.
9
What does the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure?接纳与行动问卷(AAQ-II)究竟测量的是什么?
Behav Ther. 2014 Nov;45(6):831-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
10
Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Spinal Cord Lesion-related Coping Strategies Questionnaire (SCL CSQ-S).脊髓损伤相关应对策略问卷西班牙语版(SCL CSQ-S)的改编与验证
Spinal Cord. 2014 Nov;52(11):842-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.44. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

采用多维接受模型调查在脊髓损伤后,不同接受维度与生活质量的关系。

Using the Multidimensional Model of Acceptance to Investigate How Different Facets of Acceptance are Related to Quality of Life Following Spinal Cord Injury.

机构信息

Specialized Hospital for Polio and Accident Victims, Odense; InCoRE, Department of Psychology.

Specialized Hospital for Polio and Accident Victims, Odense; InCoRE, Department of Psychology; ThRIVE, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2022 May 11;54:jrm00285. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.1055.

DOI:10.2340/jrm.v54.1055
PMID:35441695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9131195/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine how different facets of acceptance are related to quality of life (QoL) following spinal cord injury, after controlling for sociodemographic factors, injury-related variables, depression, and anxiety.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with spinal cord injury.

METHODS

Questionnaires were completed via research electronic data capture (REDCap). Three separate hierarchical multivariate linear regression analyses were performed, with physical QoL, psychological QoL, and global QoL as outcomes. Sex, age, time since injury, depression, anxiety, and 4 facets of acceptance (i.e. "accepting reality", "valuechange", "letting go of control" and "behavioural engagement") were independent variables.

RESULTS

Of the 686 eligible participants, 453 responded (66.0%). The sample included 303 men (66.9%), mean (standard deviation; SD) age 56.6 (15.0) years and mean (standard deviation) time since injury 14.6 (11.4) years. The final regression models (n = 376) explained 46% of global QoL, 47% of psychological QoL and 31% of physical QoL. The 4 facets of acceptance significantly increased the amount of variance explained by 6% for psychological QoL, 8% for physical QoL and 14% for global QoL. The facets "value-change" and "behavioural engagement" made significant contributions to all domains of QoL, while "letting go of control" only contributed to global QoL, and "accepting reality" only contributed to psychological QoL.

CONCLUSION

Acceptance may support higher QoL in more ways than simply reducing psychological distress, and could be an important process to facilitate in rehabilitation after spinal cord injury.

摘要

目的

在控制社会人口因素、损伤相关变量、抑郁和焦虑后,确定不同接受层面与脊髓损伤后的生活质量(QoL)之间的关系。

参与者

脊髓损伤的成年人。

方法

通过研究电子数据捕获(REDCap)完成问卷。进行了三次单独的分层多元线性回归分析,以身体 QoL、心理 QoL 和总体 QoL 为结果。性别、年龄、损伤后时间、抑郁、焦虑和接受的 4 个方面(即“接受现实”、“价值观改变”、“放弃控制”和“行为参与”)为自变量。

结果

在 686 名符合条件的参与者中,有 453 名(66.0%)做出了回应。样本包括 303 名男性(66.9%),平均(标准差;SD)年龄为 56.6(15.0)岁,平均(标准差)损伤后时间为 14.6(11.4)年。最终的回归模型(n=376)解释了全球 QoL 的 46%、心理 QoL 的 47%和身体 QoL 的 31%。接受的 4 个方面显著增加了心理 QoL 的可解释方差 6%、身体 QoL 的 8%和全球 QoL 的 14%。“价值观改变”和“行为参与”两个方面对 QoL 的所有领域都有重要贡献,而“放弃控制”仅对全球 QoL 有贡献,“接受现实”仅对心理 QoL 有贡献。

结论

接受可能以比仅仅减轻心理困扰更能支持更高的 QoL,并且可能是脊髓损伤后康复中促进的一个重要过程。