认知行为疗法联合经颅直流电刺激治疗抑郁症的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Efficacy of Augmentation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
机构信息
Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Psychiatry, Campus Benjamin Franklin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
出版信息
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):528-537. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0696.
IMPORTANCE
Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects approximately 10% of the population globally. Approximately 20% to 30% of patients with MDD do not sufficiently respond to standard treatment. Therefore, there is a need to develop more effective treatment strategies.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for the treatment of MDD can be enhanced by concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial PsychotherapyPlus was conducted at 6 university hospitals across Germany. Enrollment took place between June 2, 2016, and March 10, 2020; follow-up was completed August 27, 2020. Adults aged 20 to 65 years with a single or recurrent depressive episode were eligible. They were either not receiving medication or were receiving a stable regimen of antidepressant medication (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and/or mirtazapine). A total of 148 women and men underwent randomization: 53 individuals were assigned to CBT alone (group 0), 48 to CBT plus tDCS (group 1), and 47 to CBT plus sham-tDCS (group 2).
INTERVENTIONS
Participants attended a 6-week group intervention comprising 12 sessions of CBT. If assigned, tDCS was applied simultaneously. Active tDCS included stimulation with an intensity of 2 mA for 30 minutes (anode over F3, cathode over F4).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to posttreatment in the intention-to-treat sample. Scores of 0 to 6 indicate no depression; 7 to 19, mild depression; 20 to 34, moderate depression; and 34 and higher, severe depression.
RESULTS
A total of 148 patients (89 women, 59 men; mean [SD] age, 41.1 [13.7] years; MADRS score at baseline, 23.0 [6.4]) were randomized. Of these, 126 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.5 [14.0] years; MADRS score at baseline, 23.0 [6.3]) completed the study. In each of the intervention groups, intervention was able to reduce MADRS scores by a mean of 6.5 points (95% CI, 3.82-9.14 points). The Cohen d value was -0.90 (95% CI, -1.43 to -0.50), indicating a significant effect over time. However, there was no significant effect of group and no significant interaction of group × time, indicating the estimated additive effects were not statistically significant. There were no severe adverse events throughout the whole trial, and there were no significant differences of self-reported adverse effects during and after stimulation between groups 1 and 2.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Based on MADRS score changes, this trial did not indicate superior efficacy of tDCS-enhanced CBT compared with 2 CBT control conditions. The study confirmed that concurrent group CBT and tDCS is safe and feasible. However, additional research on mechanisms of neuromodulation to complement CBT and other behavioral interventions is needed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02633449.
重要性
重度抑郁症(MDD)影响了全球约 10%的人口。大约 20%至 30%的 MDD 患者对标准治疗反应不足。因此,需要开发更有效的治疗策略。
目的
研究认知行为疗法(CBT)联合经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是否能增强治疗 MDD 的疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验 PsychotherapyPlus 在德国的 6 所大学医院进行。招募于 2016 年 6 月 2 日至 2020 年 3 月 10 日进行;随访于 2020 年 8 月 27 日完成。年龄在 20 至 65 岁之间、有单次或复发性抑郁发作的成年人符合条件。他们要么不接受药物治疗,要么正在接受稳定的抗抑郁药物治疗(选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和/或米氮平)。共有 148 名女性和男性接受了随机分组:53 人被分配到 CBT 组(0 组),48 人被分配到 CBT+tDCS 组(1 组),47 人被分配到 CBT+假 tDCS 组(2 组)。
干预措施
参与者参加了为期 6 周的小组干预,包括 12 次 CBT 课程。如果分配到,同时进行 tDCS 治疗。主动 tDCS 包括以 2 mA 的强度刺激 30 分钟(阳极置于 F3,阴极置于 F4)。
主要结果和测量指标
主要结局是意向治疗样本中从基线到治疗后的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分的变化。得分 0 至 6 表示无抑郁;7 至 19 表示轻度抑郁;20 至 34 表示中度抑郁;34 及以上表示重度抑郁。
结果
共有 148 名患者(89 名女性,59 名男性;平均[SD]年龄,41.1[13.7]岁;基线 MADRS 评分,23.0[6.4])被随机分组。其中,126 名患者(平均[SD]年龄,41.5[14.0]岁;基线 MADRS 评分,23.0[6.3])完成了研究。在每个干预组中,干预都能使 MADRS 评分平均降低 6.5 分(95%CI,3.82-9.14 分)。Cohen d 值为-0.90(95%CI,-1.43 至-0.50),表明随着时间的推移有显著的效果。然而,组间无显著效果,组间和时间的交互作用也无显著意义,表明估计的附加效应在统计学上无显著意义。整个试验过程中没有严重的不良事件,1 组和 2 组在刺激期间和之后报告的不良反应也没有显著差异。
结论和相关性
根据 MADRS 评分的变化,本试验没有表明 tDCS 增强的 CBT 比 2 种 CBT 对照条件具有更好的疗效。该研究证实了同期的 CBT 和 tDCS 是安全可行的。然而,需要对神经调节机制进行更多的研究,以补充 CBT 和其他行为干预措施。
试验注册
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02633449。