De Galan Cara, Truyens Marie, Peeters Harald, Mesonero Gismero Francisco, Elorza Ainara, Torres Paola, Vandermeulen Liv, Amezaga Aranzazu Jauregui, Ferreiro-Iglesias Rocio, Holvoet Tom, Zabana Yamile, Reverter Laia Peries, Gonzales Gerard Bryan, Geldof Jeroen, Varkas Gaëlle, De Vos Martine, Lobatón Triana
Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
VIB Center for Inflammation Research (IRC), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1676-1686. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac058.
Extra-intestinal manifestations are frequently reported in inflammatory bowel diseases. However, data comparing the effect of vedolizumab and ustekinumab on articular extra-intestinal manifestations are limited. The aim here was to evaluate differences in new-onset and the evolution of pre-existing joint extra-intestinal manifestations during both treatments.
An international multicentre retrospective study was performed on inflammatory bowel disease patients who started vedolizumab or ustekinumab between May 2010 and December 2020. Extra-intestinal manifestations were assessed at baseline and joint extra-intestinal manifestations were evaluated throughout the 2-year follow-up. Arthropathy was defined by joint inflammation [arthritis/sacroiliitis], diagnosed by a rheumatologist, and arthralgia as articular pain without confirmed inflammation. Additionally, skin, ocular and hepatic extra-intestinal manifestations were assessed at baseline. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed.
In total, 911 patients [vedolizumab: 584; ustekinumab: 327] were included. Deterioration of pre-existing arthropathy and rate of new-onset arthropathy were not significantly associated with vedolizumab over ustekinumab. Arthropathy was used as reason to stop treatment in six vedolizumab and two ustekinumab patients. The odds of developing new arthralgia within 6 months was higher in patients who took vedolizumab compared to ustekinumab (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.28 [1.01-5.15], p = 0.047). However, this effect was not sustained during the 2-year follow-up (aOR: 1.35 [0.80-2.29], p = 0.259). Deterioration of pre-existing arthralgia was comparable between ustekinumab and vedolizumab-treated patients. In two vedolizumab-treated patients arthralgia was given as the reason to stop treatment.
Vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be used safely in patients with articular extra-intestinal manifestations. Only a temporary increased risk for developing arthralgia has been observed under vedolizumab.
肠外表现常见于炎症性肠病。然而,比较维多珠单抗和优特克单抗对关节型肠外表现疗效的数据有限。本研究旨在评估两种治疗过程中关节型肠外表现新发情况及原有表现的演变差异。
对2010年5月至2020年12月期间开始使用维多珠单抗或优特克单抗的炎症性肠病患者进行一项国际多中心回顾性研究。在基线时评估肠外表现,并在2年随访期间评估关节型肠外表现。关节炎由风湿病学家诊断的关节炎症(关节炎/骶髂关节炎)定义,关节痛为无确诊炎症的关节疼痛。此外,在基线时评估皮肤、眼部和肝脏肠外表现。进行单因素和多因素分析。
共纳入911例患者(维多珠单抗组584例;优特克单抗组327例)。与优特克单抗相比,维多珠单抗治疗组原有关节病恶化及新发关节病发生率无显著差异。有6例维多珠单抗治疗患者和2例优特克单抗治疗患者因关节病而停药。与优特克单抗治疗患者相比,使用维多珠单抗治疗的患者在6个月内出现新关节痛的几率更高(调整后比值比[aOR]:2.28[1.01 - 5.15],p = 0.047)。然而,在2年随访期间这种效应未持续存在(aOR:1.35[0.80 - 2.29],p = 0.259)。优特克单抗组和维多珠单抗组原有关节痛恶化情况相当。有2例维多珠单抗治疗患者因关节痛而停药。
维多珠单抗和优特克单抗可安全用于有关节型肠外表现的患者。仅观察到维多珠单抗治疗下出现关节痛的风险暂时增加。