Urology Department, Clinical Laboratory, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Sichuan, China.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Apr;26(7):2501-2510. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202204_28486.
The study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy (URS) after failed shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) (Salvage URS) with those undergoing URS without any history of SWL (Primary URS).
PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to 10th January 2021 for studies comparing outcomes of salvage URS vs. primary URS. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for procedure success and complications. Operating time was summarized using mean difference (MD).
Seven retrospective studies were included. Meta-analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the success rates of URS between the salvage URS and primary URS groups (OR: 0.83 95% CI: 0.65, 1.06 I2=0% p=0.13). On subgroup analysis, the success rate was significantly reduced in the salvage URS group for renal stones (OR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.34, 0.91 I2=0% p=0.02) but with no difference for ureter stones OR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.67, 1.21 I2=0% p=0.49). Pooled analysis demonstrated a tendency of longer operating time in the salvage URS group as compared to the primary URS group, albeit with a statistically non-significant difference (MD: 8.91 95% CI: -0.56, 18.38 I2=98% p=0.07). Meta-analysis indicated significantly increased complications in the salvage URS group as compared to the primary URS group (OR: 1.83 95% CI: 1.34, 2.49 I2=0% p=0.0001).
Evidence from retrospective studies suggests that patients undergoing salvage URS for renal stones have significantly lower success rates which is not the case for ureteral stones. There is a non-significant tendency of increased operating times for salvage URS. Complication rates are significantly higher for salvage URS as compared to primary URS. Future studies with propensity-score matching are required to strengthen current conclusions.
本研究旨在比较行体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗失败后行输尿管镜碎石术(URS)(挽救性 URS)的患者与未行 SWL 治疗的患者行 URS 的结局。
检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 CENTRAL 数据库,截至 2021 年 1 月 10 日,纳入比较挽救性 URS 与原发性 URS 结局的研究。计算了手术成功率和并发症的比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。使用均数差值(MD)总结手术时间。
纳入了 7 项回顾性研究。Meta 分析结果表明,挽救性 URS 组与原发性 URS 组的 URS 成功率无统计学差异(OR:0.83,95%CI:0.65,1.06,I2=0%,p=0.13)。亚组分析显示,对于肾结石,挽救性 URS 组的成功率显著降低(OR:0.55,95%CI:0.34,0.91,I2=0%,p=0.02),但输尿管结石的成功率无差异(OR:0.90,95%CI:0.67,1.21,I2=0%,p=0.49)。汇总分析表明,与原发性 URS 组相比,挽救性 URS 组的手术时间有延长趋势,但差异无统计学意义(MD:8.91,95%CI:-0.56,18.38,I2=98%,p=0.07)。Meta 分析表明,与原发性 URS 组相比,挽救性 URS 组的并发症发生率显著增加(OR:1.83,95%CI:1.34,2.49,I2=0%,p=0.0001)。
来自回顾性研究的证据表明,对于肾结石患者,行挽救性 URS 的成功率显著降低,而对于输尿管结石则并非如此。挽救性 URS 有手术时间延长的趋势。与原发性 URS 相比,挽救性 URS 的并发症发生率显著增加。需要进行倾向评分匹配的未来研究来加强当前的结论。