Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience and Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience and Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Cell Rep. 2022 Apr 19;39(3):110708. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110708.
Understanding the complexities of behavior is necessary to interpret neurophysiological data and establish animal models of neuropsychiatric disease. This understanding requires knowledge of the underlying information-processing structure-something often hidden from direct observation. Commonly, one assumes that behavior is solely governed by the experimenter-controlled rules that determine tasks. For example, differences in tasks that require memory of past actions are often interpreted as exclusively resulting from differences in memory. However, such assumptions are seldom tested. Here, we provide a comprehensive examination of multiple processes that contribute to behavior in a prevalent experimental paradigm. Using a combination of behavioral automation, hypothesis-driven trial design, and reinforcement learning modeling, we show that rats learn a spatial alternation task consistent with their drawing upon spatial preferences in addition to memory. Our approach also distinguishes learning based on established preferences from generalization of task structure, providing further insights into learning dynamics.
理解行为的复杂性对于解释神经生理数据和建立神经精神疾病的动物模型是必要的。这种理解需要了解潜在的信息处理结构——这通常是无法直接观察到的。通常,人们认为行为仅由决定任务的实验者控制的规则所支配。例如,需要记忆过去行为的任务差异通常被解释为仅归因于记忆的差异。然而,这种假设很少被检验。在这里,我们全面检查了在一个普遍的实验范式中导致行为的多个过程。使用行为自动化、假设驱动的试验设计和强化学习建模的组合,我们表明大鼠学习空间交替任务,这与它们在记忆之外还利用空间偏好一致。我们的方法还区分了基于既定偏好的学习和任务结构的泛化,为学习动态提供了更深入的见解。