Kroc Edward, Olvera Astivia Oscar L
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Jun;82(3):517-538. doi: 10.1177/00131644211023569. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
Setting cutoff scores is one of the most common practices when using scales to aid in classification purposes. This process is usually done univariately where each optimal cutoff value is decided sequentially, subscale by subscale. While it is widely known that this process necessarily reduces the probability of "passing" such a test, what is not properly recognized is that such a test loses power to meaningfully discriminate between target groups with each new subscale that is introduced. We quantify and describe this property via an analytical exposition highlighting the counterintuitive geometry implied by marginal threshold-setting in multiple dimensions. Recommendations are presented that encourage applied researchers to think jointly, rather than marginally, when setting cutoff scores to ensure an informative test.
设定临界分数是使用量表辅助分类时最常见的做法之一。这个过程通常是单变量进行的,即每个最优临界值是按顺序逐个分量表确定的。虽然众所周知,这个过程必然会降低通过此类测试的概率,但未得到充分认识的是,随着每个新引入的分量表,此类测试在有意义地区分目标群体方面的效力会丧失。我们通过分析阐述来量化和描述这一特性,突出多维边际阈值设定所隐含的反直觉几何关系。本文提出了一些建议,鼓励应用研究人员在设定临界分数时进行综合而非边际思考,以确保测试具有信息量。