Suppr超能文献

比较以性别为参数的评分系统与传统评分系统在预测阑尾炎方面的差异。

Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis.

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

Faculty of Medicine, General Surgery Department, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01272-y. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

Abstract

Although acute appendicitis remains the most common cause of acute abdomen in General Surgery practice, negative appendectomy rates are still high in particularly female patients. Appendicitis scoring systems considering gender can help the clinician to reduce negative appendectomy rates in females. This present study aims to compare the Lintula, Ripasa, Fenyo-Lindberg scoring systems, which use gender as a variable, with the Alvarado, Karaman, scoring systems to evaluate which CSS is more successful in the differential diagnosis of appendicitis in females. We analyzed the records of the patients operated on with a prediagnosis of acute appendicitis in our clinic between 2020 and 2021, retrospectively. Alvarado, adult appendicitis score (AAS), appendicitis inflammatory response score (AIRS), Ripasa, Karaman, Lintula, and Fenyo Lindberg scores were calculated for each patient. The patients were divided into two groups as male and female, according to gender. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the best cut-off value and assess the performance of the test score for appendicitis. Three hundred and sixty-three patients were included in the study. One hundred seventy-two (47.4%) of the patients were male, and 191 (52.6%) were female. Alvarado and AAS were the most valuable score in female (AUC: 0.805, sensitivity: 0.63, specificity: 0.83; and area under curve (AUC): 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity: 0.76, respectively), male group (AUC: 0.828, Sensitivity: 0.71, Specificity: 0.83; and AUC: 0.834, Sensitivity 0.74, Specificity: 0.77, respectively), and when patients were not categorized by gender (AUC: 0.818, Sensitivity: 0.67 Specificity: 0.83; and AUC: 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity: 0.76, respectively). Although the Alvarado scoring system is the first defined appendicitis scoring system, it seems as superior to the many scoring systems defined after it in predicting appendicitis, even in female patients.

摘要

尽管急性阑尾炎仍然是普通外科实践中最常见的急性腹痛原因,但在女性患者中,阴性阑尾切除率仍然很高。考虑到性别的阑尾炎评分系统可以帮助临床医生降低女性的阴性阑尾切除率。本研究旨在比较 Lintula、Ripasa、Fenyo-Lindberg 评分系统,这些系统将性别作为一个变量,与 Alvarado、Karaman 评分系统进行比较,以评估哪种 CSS 更能成功地对女性阑尾炎进行鉴别诊断。我们回顾性分析了 2020 年至 2021 年在我院行术前诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者的病历。为每位患者计算了 Alvarado、成人阑尾炎评分(AAS)、阑尾炎炎症反应评分(AIRS)、Ripasa、Karaman、Lintula 和 Fenyo Lindberg 评分。根据性别将患者分为男性和女性两组。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定最佳截断值,并评估测试评分对阑尾炎的性能。研究共纳入 363 例患者。172 例(47.4%)为男性,191 例(52.6%)为女性。Alvarado 和 AAS 是女性最有价值的评分(AUC:0.805,敏感性:0.63,特异性:0.83;AUC:0.794,敏感性 0.71,特异性:0.76),男性组(AUC:0.828,敏感性:0.71,特异性:0.83;AUC:0.834,敏感性 0.74,特异性:0.77),当患者不分性别时(AUC:0.818,敏感性:0.67,特异性:0.83;AUC:0.794,敏感性 0.71,特异性:0.76)。尽管 Alvarado 评分系统是第一个定义的阑尾炎评分系统,但它似乎比之后定义的许多评分系统更能预测阑尾炎,即使是在女性患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bb/9022019/b56f2ef102da/13304_2022_1272_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验