Suppr超能文献

不同年龄分层组阑尾炎评分系统的诊断准确率

Diagnostic Accuracy Rates of Appendicitis Scoring Systems for the Stratified Age Groups.

作者信息

Gonullu Emre, Bayhan Zulfu, Capoglu Recayi, Mantoglu Barış, Kamburoglu Burak, Harmantepe Tarık, Altıntoprak Fatih, Erkorkmaz Unal

机构信息

Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.

出版信息

Emerg Med Int. 2022 Oct 31;2022:2505977. doi: 10.1155/2022/2505977. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many scoring systems have been developed for acute appendicitis, which is the most common emergent disorder in surgical practice. Considering the physiological changes and chronic diseases occurring with advancing age, an applied scoring system may not produce the same score in similar patients in all age groups.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the predictive values of scoring systems in different age groups.

METHODS

In this prospective study, the patients operated on in our clinic with a prediagnosis of acute appendicitis between March 2020 and March 2021 were included. We divided them into three age groups as 18-45 years (group 1), 46-65 years (group 2), and >65 years (group 3). We compared the scores of the nine acute appendicitis scoring systems most commonly used in the literature for these age groups.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients were included in our study. The Alvarado scoring system yielded the most accurate results for group 1, whereas the Fenyo-Linberg scoring system was the most accurate system for group 2 and the Eskelinen scoring system for group 3.

CONCLUSION

Age should be considered as a major parameter during the selection of the scoring system to be applied for patients with prediagnosis of acute appendicitis. Our study revealed the Alvarado and the Fenyo-Lindberg scoring systems as the most accurate systems for the differential diagnosis of appendicitis in the 18-45 and 46-65 years age groups, respectively. Although we found the Eskelinen scoring system as the most accurate one in the >65 years age group, the confidence intervals indicated that it may not be appropriate for use alone in this group.

摘要

背景

针对急性阑尾炎已开发出多种评分系统,急性阑尾炎是外科手术中最常见的急症。考虑到随着年龄增长出现的生理变化和慢性疾病,应用的评分系统在所有年龄组的相似患者中可能不会得出相同的分数。

目的

我们旨在比较不同年龄组中评分系统的预测价值。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了2020年3月至2021年3月期间在我们诊所接受手术且预诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者。我们将他们分为三个年龄组:18 - 45岁(第1组)、46 - 65岁(第2组)和>65岁(第3组)。我们比较了文献中最常用的九种急性阑尾炎评分系统在这些年龄组中的分数。

结果

我们的研究共纳入203例患者。阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在第1组中产生的结果最准确,而芬约 - 林伯格评分系统在第2组中是最准确的系统,埃斯凯林评分系统在第3组中最准确。

结论

在为预诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者选择应用的评分系统时,应将年龄视为一个主要参数。我们的研究表明,阿尔瓦拉多和芬约 - 林伯格评分系统分别是18 - 45岁和46 - 65岁年龄组中阑尾炎鉴别诊断最准确的系统。尽管我们发现埃斯凯林评分系统在>65岁年龄组中最准确,但置信区间表明它可能不适用于该组单独使用。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy Rates of Appendicitis Scoring Systems for the Stratified Age Groups.
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Oct 31;2022:2505977. doi: 10.1155/2022/2505977. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis.
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01272-y. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
The Value of Scoring Systems for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis.
Pol Przegl Chir. 2015 Feb;87(2):65-70. doi: 10.1515/pjs-2015-0021.
7
A comparative study on the diagnostic validity of three scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in emergency centres.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;10(3):132-135. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
A Comparative Study of RIPASA Score and ALVARADO Score in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Nov;8(11):NC03-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9055.5170. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Evaluation of modified Alvarado scoring system and RIPASA scoring system as diagnostic tools of acute appendicitis.
World J Emerg Med. 2017;8(4):276-280. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.04.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Appendicitis Score and Ultrasound in children with Acute Appendicitis: An Observational Study.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2025 Feb;63(282):109-113. doi: 10.31729/jnma.8889. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis.
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01272-y. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 lockdown: never waste a crisis!
Br J Surg. 2021 Jan 27;108(1):e31-e32. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa073.
3
RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Sep 24;59:138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.029. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
7
Acute appendicitis may no longer be a predominant disease of the young population.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(4):283-288. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.87332.
9
The Karaman score: A new diagnostic score for acute appendicitis.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Nov;24(6):545-551. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2018.62436.
10
The RIPASA score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A comparison with the modified Alvarado score.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed). 2018 Apr-Jun;83(2):112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2017.06.002. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验