• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会相关性调节多感官整合。

Social relevance modulates multisensory integration.

机构信息

School of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Sep;48(9):1022-1038. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001013. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0001013
PMID:35446086
Abstract

When interacting with the environment, humans exhibit robust biases toward information that pertains to themselves: Self-relevant information is processed faster and yields more accurate responses than information linked to others. Recent studies have shown that simple social associations can lead to the instant deployment of this benefit in the processing of abstract stimuli. However, how self-prioritization evolves across the processing hierarchy has been a subject of intense debate. Furthermore, there is little empirical evidence about the functional efficiency of social relevance in natural environments in which information is present across multiple senses. Across three experiments (each = 40), the present study shows that self-prioritization effects (a) can arise in simple audio-visual numerosity judgements, (b) can be efficiently deployed across the senses by funneling perception toward self-relevant information in the more reliable sensory modality, and (c) modulate the integration of auditory and visual information into a multisensory representation. Taken together, the present findings suggest that social relevance can influence multisensory processing at both perceptual and postperceptual stages via early attentional modulations of sensory integration and later, task-dependent attentional control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当与环境相互作用时,人类表现出强烈的偏向于与自身相关的信息的倾向:与自身相关的信息比与他人相关的信息处理得更快,产生更准确的反应。最近的研究表明,简单的社会关联可以导致在处理抽象刺激时即时部署这种优势。然而,自我优先化如何在处理层次结构中演变一直是激烈争论的主题。此外,关于在自然环境中信息存在于多种感官中的社会相关性的功能效率的经验证据很少。在三项实验(每项 = 40)中,本研究表明,自我优先化效应(a)可以在简单的视听数量判断中产生,(b)可以通过在更可靠的感觉模式中引导感知朝向与自身相关的信息,在感觉之间有效地部署,(c)调节听觉和视觉信息到多感觉表示中的整合。总之,目前的研究结果表明,社会相关性可以通过早期对感觉整合的注意力调节以及后来的任务依赖注意力控制,在感知和感知后阶段影响多感觉处理。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Social relevance modulates multisensory integration.社会相关性调节多感官整合。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Sep;48(9):1022-1038. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001013. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Distinct Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Attention and Expectation Guide Perceptual Inference in a Multisensory World.空间注意和期望的独特神经机制指导多感觉世界中的知觉推断。
J Neurosci. 2019 Mar 20;39(12):2301-2312. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2873-18.2019. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
3
Self as a prior: The malleability of Bayesian multisensory integration to social salience.自我为先:贝叶斯多感觉整合对社会显著性的可塑造性。
Br J Psychol. 2024 May;115(2):185-205. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12683. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
The impact of attentional demands on audiovisual integration depends on task-specific components.注意力需求对视听整合的影响取决于特定于任务的组件。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2023 Mar;77(1):3-19. doi: 10.1037/cep0000295. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
5
The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.多感官整合与内源性和外源性注意力的相互作用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Feb;61:208-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
6
Early attention modulates perceptual interpretation of multisensory stimuli.早期注意力调节多感官刺激的感知解释。
Neuroreport. 2011 Aug 24;22(12):586-91. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834901f3.
7
Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.视听运动知觉中的跨模态相互作用和多感觉整合——自由场研究。
Brain Res. 2012 Jul 23;1466:99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 May 14.
8
Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task.视听联合任务中的并行感知增强与层次相关性评估
Brain Res. 2008 Oct 21;1236:126-39. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.104. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
9
Self-prioritization with unisensory and multisensory stimuli in a matching task.在匹配任务中对单感觉和多感觉刺激进行自我优先化。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1666-1688. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02498-z. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
Visual, auditory and tactile stimuli compete for early sensory processing capacities within but not between senses.视觉、听觉和触觉刺激在感官内部竞争早期感觉加工能力,但不在感官之间竞争。
Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 15;97:224-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-prioritization in working memory gating.工作记忆门控中的自我优先级设定
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):399-414. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02869-8. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
2
Beyond peripersonal boundaries: insights from crossmodal interactions.超越近体边界:来自跨模态相互作用的启示。
Cogn Process. 2024 Feb;25(1):121-132. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01154-0. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
Self-referential and social saliency information influences memory following attention orienting.自我参照和社会显著性信息在注意定向后会影响记忆。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1092512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092512. eCollection 2023.